User talk:Kjscotte34

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Kjscotte34! I have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on or by typing helpme at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! AFriedman  (talk)  21:33, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article

Blogs
There is absolutely no universal Wikipedia rule that blogs are not reliable sources. It depends on where the blog is located and who is writing it. Blahblah32blahblah (talk) 18:52, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Hey, I'm with you. I want to get it right, just like you. But we still have to stick with what the team has officially put out. That's all. I'm willing to be next week he shows up and does wear #27. Kjscotte34 (talk) 18:55, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Blocked him for a year
Well, I warned him, but apparently, he didn't listen. I just blocked him for a year as promised. If you need to report a sock of this nincompoop again, just go to Administrator intervention against vandalism. Or, give me a call. :) --PMDrive1061 (talk) 16:29, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Common name/real name
As I said before your edit, I recognized that Vince McMahon is his common name. In fact, if you have time to look in the history, I changed his name from Vincent to Vince in the World Wrestling Entertainment article. But it is not the case in the List of WWE personnel article. The column is about real names. Theodore DiBiase common name is Ted DiBiase, but in that column is stated Theodore DiBiase instead because is his born name, so his real name. The same case occurs in Randy Orton. This is his common name. But in the real name column is stated Randal Orton because is his born name. The same with Tony Chimel/Anthony Chimel, Bill DeMott/William DeMott, Matt Martlaro/Matthew Martlaro, Steve Keirn/Stephen Keirn, Tom Prichard/Thomas Prichard, Jack Doan/John Doan, Mike Chioda/Michael Chioda and many others in the same article. Why would be different with Vince? Why could not be stated that his real name is Vincent? I hope you understand my point of view. I expect you comprehend that common name and real name in this case are two completely different things. Thanks for the attention. WWEJobber (talk) 09:22, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

An/I discussion; Bob's Burgers trivia sock
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. See ANI. KnownAlias   contact   07:07, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Sergio Mitre
I found the Mitre transaction on MLB's official website (MLB.com). Go to the players drop down bar on the home page, and there's a thing for transactions. You should find it there. Gibberish77 (talk) 22:05, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Re
That's probably the best place to stick it; the problem is that while it was a significant event in his career, he never outright said he did it (probably on the advice of his attorney). I'm not a BLP zealot by any stretch, but that's a pretty serious BLP issue, so I removed it. Thanks for giving your opinion; I always like feedback and ideas. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい ) 23:29, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Yankees
Looks like ESPN has been right with every number so far. We'll see later if they're all correct on ESPN. RevanFan (talk) 16:07, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, ESPN got every number right, just as I thought. Can we trust them now? RevanFan (talk) 21:43, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Sawk
Just to update, after more evidence was provided, the sockpuppet Nomelck and the sockmaster have been banned. Starship.paint (talk) 09:05, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The new evidence was simply their new contributions after the investigation was closed. They posted twice more to the same talk page agreeing with each other within half an hour. In light of this the closing admin decided there was enough evidence, as the investigation was already very suspicious. Starship.paint (talk) 13:19, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Roster numbers
Yeah, no problem. I was just thinking it was all legit. But not a big deal. Correct?-DANO- (talk) 02:02, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Twitter as a source
I knew I had read something about this matter before, and I just found this essay. It seems to suggest that a beat writer's reporting shouldn't use Twitter as a citation, but if Youkilis himself were to tweet his number, that would be okay. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:11, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Editing Restrictions
I am an autoconfirmed user. Earlier today, I attempted to make an edit to the Alex Rodriguez article, which is semi-protected. However, I was denied access. Kjscotte34 (talk) 18:45, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
 * As far as I can see, the logs show it is semi-protected against editing, but fully protected against moving...
 * Did you attempt to move it?
 * If editing - was it directly (i.e. wikitext) or with the new Visual Editor?
 * What message did the system give you?
 *  Ron h jones  (Talk) 18:52, 1 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Two additional questions: Have you tried whether the effect persists? Is this the only article affected, or are you denied access to all semi-protected articles? Huon (talk) 19:15, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Art and Feminism Event in Bennington March 5
Hey! I wanted to let you know about an upcoming Art+Feminism event, at Bennington College on March 5: from 2-6 in the afternoon. It would be great to see some more Wikipedia editors at the event! Sign up here to let us know you will be attending! Sadads (talk) 02:47, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

AN3
I thought I'd notify you since you were involved in the discussion on the talk page: Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring  Toddst1 (talk) 23:47, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

User:Vjmlhds
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. This concerns and solicits community resolution..  Acroterion   (talk)   01:37, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)