User talk:Kk2010123

Welcome!

Hello, Kk2010123, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Barclays Player of the Season, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Shadowjams (talk) 23:08, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Barclays Player of the Season


The article Barclays Player of the Season has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not sufficient content for a full article. Lacks context.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shadowjams (talk) 23:08, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Serbian Footballer of the Year


A tag has been placed on Serbian Footballer of the Year requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  Falcon8765  (T ALK ) 01:40, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Barclays Player of the Season


Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Barclays Player of the Season. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Premier League Player of the Month. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Premier League Player of the Month - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. DeVerm (talk) 03:28, 31 July 2011 (UTC)


 * I have reverted the speedy nomination after I found some references of this award. I still think that there's no actual award for this like there is for the Barclays player of the month, but I could not let the nomination stand --DeVerm (talk) 04:32, 31 July 2011 (UTC).

Nomination of Barclays Player of the Season for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Barclays Player of the Season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Barclays Player of the Season until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Shadowjams (talk) 06:33, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Template:National Footballer of the Year, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you.--Oleola (talk) 11:51, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Template:National Footballer of the Year shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. --Oleola (talk) 11:51, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The list of 33 best football players of the championship of Russia


The article The list of 33 best football players of the championship of Russia has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No evidence of notability (or existence) of this list/award.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pam D  09:23, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of In the list of 33 best football players of the championship of Russia


The article In the list of 33 best football players of the championship of Russia has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * '''No content other than the opening sentence

Links to Russian wiki where there are lists of players - can't check for copyvio of that unfortunately. Needs to be edited or deleted'''

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Antiqueight  confer 13:00, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of In the list of 33 best football players of the championship of Russia for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article In the list of 33 best football players of the championship of Russia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/In the list of 33 best football players of the championship of Russia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Antiqueight  confer 20:18, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of In the list of 33 best football players of the championship of Russia


A tag has been placed on In the list of 33 best football players of the championship of Russia, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. JMHamo (talk) 14:31, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

January 2014
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Do not insert your username into articles Bgwhite (talk) 06:54, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Yi Long


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Yi Long requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Snowstormer ( T • C) 16:00, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Yi Long


A tag has been placed on Yi Long, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dps04 (talk) 16:00, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kunlun Fight


A tag has been placed on Kunlun Fight, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DThomsen8 (talk) 12:45, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kunlun Fight


A tag has been placed on Kunlun Fight requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.), but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jbh (talk) 09:21, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Ways to improve KunLun fight
Hi, I'm Helenabella. Kk2010123, thanks for creating KunLun fight!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Hi there, your newly created article would benefit greatly from some references and from providing more insight into the reasons the subject is notable.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Helenabella  (Talk)  17:31, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dzianis Zuev


The article Dzianis Zuev has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Wgolf (talk) 00:05, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Kunlun Fight（China）
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Kunlun Fight（China）, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: KunLun fight. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:24, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Kunlun Fight（China）


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Kunlun Fight（China）. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – KunLun fight. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at KunLun fight – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. DanielRigal (talk) 23:27, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Kunlun Fight（kickboxing）
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Kunlun Fight（kickboxing）, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.kunlunjue.com/kunlunfightaboutus.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 06:59, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Repost of Kunlun Fight（kickboxing）
A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. Peter Rehse (talk) 09:26, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

June 2015
This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:08, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Repeatedly recreating deleted pages. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:09, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of Thu, 11 Jun 2015 23:32:56 GMT for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. DMacks (talk) 16:34, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Ways to improve Kunlun Jue（Kickboxing）
Hi, I'm Smileverse. Kk2010123, thanks for creating Kunlun Jue（Kickboxing）!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please expand this article with more information about the subject with verifiable citations.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Mohith:) 10:00, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 22:27, 12 June 2015 (UTC) .

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistent disruptive editing. As you know, you have previously been blocked for repeatedly re-creating an article that was deleted as a result of a deletion discussion. You have repeatedly changed to different variations of the title of the article, as other versions have been protected to prevent you from re-creating them. Now, you have re-created the article yet again, but combined its contents with trivial content about one particular event organised by the company you are trying to publicise, apparently in an attempt to give the superficial impression that it is on a different subject, and thereby avoid deletion. When the article was, nevertheless, nominated for deletion, you moved it to another title, a tile which was totally inappropriate for the subject of the article. In the course of checking your editing history, I found that there is at least one other article which you have repeatedly created following deletion as a result of a deletion discussion, and that with that one too you have moved to different variations of its title, apparently in an attempt to avoid detection. At present, I have blocked you for just three months, but if I ever see that you have done anything like this again, I am likely to block you indefinitely. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:57, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

March 2017
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on List of European Cup and UEFA Champions League top scorers. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Qed237&#160;(talk) 11:00, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

List of European Cup and UEFA Champions League top scorers
Hi. Regarding your edits on List of European Cup and UEFA Champions League top scorers, please remember that it is not you that decides what is notable or not and we can not have "Other famous scorers" as it is WP:POV to have a list like that. Who decides which players are "famous scorers"?. In any way you must have a consensus when adding content like that, especially after being reverted. So please discuss at the article talkpage or you risk being reported to WP:ANEW. Qed237&#160;(talk) 11:08, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

August 2017
I suspected the is you, so give you yet level 3 warning on this page again for this edit. The source ESPN independent said 50m pound. If you keep revert to 50m euro, i will report you to admin. Here is the template message.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to List of most expensive association football transfers, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Matthew_hk  t  c  17:45, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Matthew_hk  t  c  07:18, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:List of European Cup and UEFA Champions League top scorers less 20 goals concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:List of European Cup and UEFA Champions League top scorers less 20 goals, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 21:12, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:List of European Cup and UEFA Champions League top scorers less 20 goals


Hello, Kk2010123. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of European Cup and UEFA Champions League top scorers less 20 goals".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 04:08, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Chinese Football Association Footballer of the Year moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Chinese Football Association Footballer of the Year, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. '''Engr. Smitty  Werben''' 19:45, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Chinese Football Association Footballer of the Year
Hello, Kk2010123. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chinese Football Association Footballer of the Year, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:14, 2 May 2023 (UTC)