User talk:Kkaitlyn0304/Resource room/Jaytrey02 Peer Review

Peer Review
Lead:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? No
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? I think you can address the purpose of a Resource room some more. What are some different types and how are they used differently.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? N/A
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? N/A
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Concise

Content


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topic? Yes, There is mention of resource rooms in different parts of the world

Tone and Balance


 * Is the content added neutral? I think you can add some information about how resource rooms may not be used properly to give it the other side of the claim.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? As it is currently written, I definitely feel the need to look into a resource room, however the wiki's are supposed to only provide information.

Sources and References


 * Are the sources current? Yes
 * Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? Yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work? The links all work

Organization

Guiding questions
 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes, It is concise and to the point, it is easy to read.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes, the page is broken down into sections.
 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes, the additions made the article easier to understand and provided a lot more information on the topic which had more details.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? I really enjoyed the examples of resource rooms in other countries. That provided some global context that was missing in the original post.
 * How can the content added be improved? Adding more of the counter side would make the page less biased. It is clear that you have a deep understanding of this topic and seem to be an advocate of resource rooms. It is important that you still keep a neutral tone. I struggle with that in my page as well. Perhaps you could list some of the cost benefit issues with having a resource room, maybe provide some examples where they weren't as effective and what potential downfalls might be.

Jaytrey02 (talk) 08:01, 26 March 2024 (UTC)