User talk:Kkb1982lc

helpme Thanks to my first editors. Anyone else have any ideas or corrections for me? I would be excited to post this page into Wiki but know that it should be edited by a few veteran wiki people first. Any advice on posting with out getting my work rejected I would appreciate as well.

Kkb1982lc (talk) 18:57, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, this certainly needs expansion, and I suggest using the sources found through this search and this search. I'd also expand each references for full attribution. For example for a web source you should be providing, access dates, date of the piece if relevant, author if available and publisher; for a book, title, author, year, isbn, publisher, location, URL and accessdate if online. These can be done much more easily using citation templates and I suggest going to your preferences → gadgets → Editing gadgets and turning on refTools (it's very useful). See Citation templates for more on this. The article has a mild promotional tone, thought not nearly so much as in some I see. I suggest, when you expand, showing he is a celebrated and honored architect by detailing his honors and awards and write ups, instead of saying he is (show, don't tell applies quite well to encyclopedia articles, though normally stated in relation to fiction writing). Also note that, based on my searches, this article, when moved (not cut and pasted) to the mainspace, should be at Peter Bohlin, not Peter Q. Bohlin, as the former appears to be his common name. By the way, this site is called Wikipedia, not wiki. A wiki is any website using wiki software; there are thousands of them. Cheers.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 20:09, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Nomination of Bohlin Cywinski Jackson for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bohlin Cywinski Jackson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bohlin Cywinski Jackson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 20:54, 11 March 2013 (UTC)