User talk:Kkm010/Archive 6

Leave me a message | Send me a mail.

June 2012
Please refrain from abusing warning or blocking templates, as you did to User talk:Tib42. Doing so is a violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 17:22, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
 * That's not abusing, that's warning who crossed his line time and again. Understand.--( talk→  Kkm010   ←track )  04:39, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The user did not even edit that page. Check history before hitting buttons blindly. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 06:12, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
 * yeah that I agree with you. That was my mistake.--( talk→  Kkm010   ←track )  10:38, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia Help Survey
Hi there, my name's Peter Coombe and I'm a Wikimedia Community Fellow working on a project to improve Wikipedia's help system. At the moment I'm trying to learn more about how people use and find the current help pages. If you could help by filling out this brief survey about your experiences, I'd be very grateful. It should take less than 10 minutes, and your responses will not be tied to your username in any way.

Thank you for your time,

the wub (talk) 18:14, 14 June 2012 (UTC) (Delivered using Global message delivery)

Anant Agarwal page
hi Kkm010! you removed the Infobox template from the biography page. Kindly follow the Biographies of living person guidelines. Deepon (talk) 08:20, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Panasonic and industry classifications from Forbes
I thought that you had stopped this tedious and disruptive behaviour but obviously not. Edit warring to change industry classifications to rigidly conform with the Forbes list is unacceptable. It is a single source and is frequently wrong. Panasonic is a clear case in point, consumer electronics are a small proportion of the company's activities and sales (read their annual report: ) and a large number of reliable third-party sources can be found which describe Panasonic as an electronics company rather than a "consumer electronics" company e.g..

Home appliances, semiconductors, medical equipment, air conditioners, solar panels, lighting, factory automation equipment and electronic components are not consumer electronics. Describing the company overall in the first sentence of the article as a 'consumer electronics' company is misleading and incorrect and edit warring to impose the change is simply beyond the pale.

You have been engaging in a similarly tedious and incorrect effort at Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, where you have been repeatedly adding that the company produces Heavy equipment, when it does not make construction equipment. Once again you have been inflexibly attempting to impose classifications from the Forbes list.

The Forbes list is a single source, often wrong, and holds no special status within WP.Rangoon11 (talk) 17:06, 18 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Well if you think Panasonic is an Electronics company then keep it. But I personally believe that Panasonic is a consumer electronics company rather than electronics.--( talk→  Kkm010   ←track )  04:30, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

National Institute of Technology, Warangal Article edit
You edited and removed important information like the Departments, Admission and Alumni from the National Institute of Technology, Warangal article. All major institutes have this info so I fail to understand why it should not be present on this page too. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiindiarocks (talk • contribs) 12:39, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Edit summary "ce" but adding new material.
In James Clerk Maxwell, you added a sentence, but your edit summary says "ce". To me, at least, "ce" means "copy edit", and I don't consider adding new material to be copy editing. May be me though. Nczempin (talk) 13:52, 21 June 2012 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry, it was a mistake. It wasn't copied from the source.-- ♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪  ߷  ♀ Contribs ♀ 04:26, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 28
Hi. When you recently edited Coimbatore Institute of Technology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NAAC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:27, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Delhi University
Hi kkm010. The wikipedia page for delhi university is grossly under represented,the information is outdated and not accurate and the layout is way out of order.I am in the process of editing it and I WILL PROVIDE THE REQUIRED REFERENCES.So until then, do not cancel or delete the contents that i have painstakingly edited.If you feel that my edits are biased or not objective enough flag,tag or challenge the edits.Do not undo the changes that i have made.If you have the time please do contribute by editing the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dell335 (talk • contribs) 06:37, 29 June 2012 (UTC)


 * OK, but tags are going to remain.-- ♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪  ߷  ♀ Contribs ♀ 09:14, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Discussion
I have protected the article N. R. Narayana Murthy again, and I am attempting to mediate a resolution on the talk page of the article. Since you have been involved in editing this article, I ask you to join the discussion so that a consensus can form. I'm sending this notice to all recent editors. Dennis Brown - 2&cent;    &copy;  23:55, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Power companies
Hi, Kkm010. In the case you did not notice, I posted a question concerning industry classification of the power generation companies at the Company infobox talk page. I would like also to mention that power generation is not a good/product—the product is electrical power. Also electrical power distribution and electrical power transmission are not goods but services. Thank you. Beagel (talk) 07:53, 2 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks Beagel! For for your advice.-- ♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪  ߷  ♀ Contribs ♀ 04:08, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Article Boson
WP:TT Vandalism of article as Boson can result in permanent ban — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nickni28 (talk • contribs) 09:16, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Indian-express.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Indian-express.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:22, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Boson
I suggest you take another look at WP:NOTVAND and refrain from calling good faith edits vandalism. Just a heads up. Thanks. -- Neil N   talk to me  13:47, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
 Neil N   talk to me  15:07, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Replied again. -- Neil N   talk to me  15:30, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Enrico Fermi
Hallo Kkm010,

I reverted twice your edits in the lead section of the article about Fermi. As I adviced you in the previous revert, if you want to change it, please use first the Talk page. In particular, don't change his origin without discussing, since there was a long querelle about it. Thanks, Alex2006 (talk) 15:30, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Looking at your talk page,I think that you did not realize yet that Wikipedia is a collaborative project. I signaled you to an administrator. Please stop modifying the lead of Enrico Fermi without consensus, otherwise you can be blocked. Alex2006 (talk) 06:37, 7 July 2012 (UTC)


 * You really do seem to have a problem with Wikipedia's policies regarding dispute resolution. Please don't revert the Fermi article again, or your editing privileges will be temporarily revoked. Favonian (talk) 10:10, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Warning: Removing referenced/verified sentences article Boson
Hello, You have to give better reasons than just using the word Vandalism. We have provided references for the information. I called in the admin NeilN its better you deal with him. Thanks, nickni28 (talk)

Boson
Your recent editing history at Boson shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.-- ♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪  ߷  ♀ Contribs ♀ 13:31, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Unsourced
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Richard Feynman. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 10:06, 7 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Note. Similar remarks for your edits at Ernest Rutherford and Pierre Curie. Please do not add such unsourced content to articles. Cheers and thanks. - DVdm (talk) 10:04, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Ernest Rutherford. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The statement about Faraday is not in the cited source. - DVdm (talk) 10:23, 7 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Calm down. Don't get so upset, I respect & understand you're concern.-- ♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪  ߷  ♀ Contribs ♀ 10:32, 7 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Calm and not in the least upset, thanks. Please do note however that the sources you provided to Feynman and Rutherford are now tertiary sources. It would be nice to have proper wp:secondary sources for that, but I will not undo the edits. Cheers. - DVdm (talk) 10:53, 7 July 2012 (UTC)


 * You know EB source is highly credible since some of brightest scholars edit those articles. Since you requested I would try to put another source for that matter. Thanks Enjoy editing-- ♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪  ߷  ♀ Contribs ♀ 10:59, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. —Favonian (talk) 13:20, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit-warring at Enrico Fermi. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. MastCell Talk 05:54, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

When this block expires, I hope you use the article's talk page to make your case. You do have some points, and I don't believe consensus was reached in the existing discussion, but edit warring is not the way to get what you want. -- Neil N   talk to me  15:17, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Aristotle's page
Hi,Sorry to bother you - I don't know if it was yourself or one of the other editors, though I suspect it was a man -

there is a line on Aristotle's page referring to his wife, who 'bore Him a daughter' - I think this is just an unnecessarily sexist (is it a religious phrase?) way of saying she gave birth to a daughter. She was not a machine....unless she was raped I assume she had a child for reasons including the fact SHE wanted one.....I assume she didn't just open up. The phrase is no longer in use, I believe? Thanks 92.41.251.196 (talk) 03:39, 11 July 2012 (UTC)