User talk:Kkm010/Archive 7

Repeated message?
I curious as to why you are leaving the same message (about a dead issue) in multiple places:


 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Materialscientist#Higgs_boson_2
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:FT2#Higgs_boson
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Woz2#Higgs_boson
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:TimothyRias#Higgs_boson_2
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Higgs_boson#Take_help

The issue was resolved here:


 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Higgs_boson#A_particle_behaving_like_Higgs

Cheers!

--Woz2 (talk) 13:27, 15 July 2012 (UTC)


 * At the talk page of higgs boson I saw that numerous editors are finding it difficult about the introduction of the article that's why, I thought may I should provided a good source which would ultimately them to resolve the problem.-- ♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪  ߷  ♀ Contribs ♀ 13:31, 15 July 2012 (UTC)


 * No problem. It is a difficult topic indeed, but the Britannica didn't really help. Woz2 (talk) 13:40, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

July 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from List of countries by GDP (nominal). When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_countries_by_GDP_(nominal)&action=history page history]. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ''Your unexplained removal of well sourced material is unhelpful. '' Fasttimes68 (talk) 11:59, 17 July 2012 (UTC)


 * I had reverted with edit summary why its not imp to put UN figures.-- ♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪  ߷  ♀ Contribs ♀ 13:29, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your explanation. Please refer to the talk page for the article for further discussion. Fasttimes68 (talk) 13:31, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
 Neil N   talk to me  12:34, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

What kind of cleanup does this wikipedia page need?
I did some formatting changes and verified the citations needed for the article on the Wipro Wikipedia page. I would love to know why that Wikipedia page need cleanup as suggested by you and what kind of cleanup we are looking at?

Thanks in advance. Lets make the world a better place. Nikhiltsa (talk) 04:16, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Some grammatical as well the spelling correction required with date fixation keep that some bot will resolve that problem, its a minor error. You did a great job by contributing substantially to the article. Thanks-- ♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪  ߷  ♀ Contribs ♀ 04:30, 20 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the suggestion and prompt reply. I rechecked the Wikipedia article for grammatical errors and which i was not able to find. It would be great if you can point out and help to get the article correct. Thanks

Nikhiltsa (talk) 05:05, 20 July 2012 (UTC)


 * As I am not able to find out any issues in the Wipro Wikipedia page so I would like to take down the cleanup warning. Let me know if you think otherwise.

Nikhiltsa (talk) 05:38, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Don't worry my dear friend some, bot would ultimately clean it up, its just a matter of time.-- ♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪  ߷  ♀ Contribs ♀ 09:05, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Indian Armed Forces
I reverted your change to Indian Armed Forces in GF as he hasn't sworn in yet.Sincerely,  TheStrike  Σagle   13:43, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I agree.-- ♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪  ߷  ♀ Contribs ♀ 13:45, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Do you have AWB browser?
Just being wondering, please reply. V ani s che numTalk 05:16, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm curious to know: why did you say you did it with AWB in this edit? Sorry if I am wrong, please clear me. I hope you have a great day. :) V ani s che numTalk 06:39, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Those are unsourced materials and that has to be removed.-- ♥ Kkm010 ♥  ♪ Talk ♪  ߷  ♀ Contribs ♀ 13:58, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Gina Rinehart
I partially reverted an edit re Rinehart's education, and left a note at the talk page. Feel free to jump in the discussion if you think i've got something wrong there. Cheers, hamiltonstone (talk) 06:10, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Edit summary
Your edit summary to this revision seems to be inappropriate. Please try to provide accurate edit summaries in future. Thanks. Salih ( talk ) 08:11, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

List of Presidents of India
Per WP:NFLISTS, the use of non-free images in lists such as this is not supported. Despite the comments placed in the code, you re-added File:Dr Zakir Hussain.jpg, File:Varahagiri Venkata Giri.jpg, and File:Dr fakhruddin ali ahmed.jpg, all of which are non-free images. Even if such use were permitted, the images do not comply with WP:NFCC #10c, in that no rationale has been provided on the image description page for use on this list. I will be removing the images again if you do not happen to do so yourself first. I implore you to please avoid such use in the future. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 12:38, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry for my stupid actions.-- ♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪  ߷  ♀ Contribs ♀ 13:12, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Not knowing something doesn't make you stupid. Now you know :) --Hammersoft (talk) 13:27, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Actually I pissed you off, sorry for that.-- ♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪  ߷  ♀ Contribs ♀ 13:34, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The first day I'm actually pissed off over something on Wikipedia is my last day on Wikipedia. --Hammersoft (talk) 13:38, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Star maja.PNG)
Thanks for uploading File:Star maja.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:18, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Singapore lead
I was hoping that this would be a substantial enough change. What in the current version do you feel is excessive detail? It's about the same length as the leads for India and the United Kingdom, and about half the length of the United States lead (comparisons done through rough approximation of their length on my monitor). CMD (talk) 04:42, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The changes you made are good and its far better now. I would still prefer a three para in the top most section, if you see India article (as you know its nominated as featured article), in Singapore lead in third para you have mentioned "The People's Action Party has won every election since self-government in 1959, and governs on the basis of a strong state and prioritising collective welfare over individual rights such as freedom of speech, an approach that has attracted criticism from organisations such as Freedom House", I would say that's redundant it must be mentioned in the political section of the article. Try to make a three para article as it has been done in featured article India.-- ♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪  ߷  ♀ Contribs ♀ 04:52, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
 * India's three paragraphs are 349 words long, Singapore's four paragraphs are 367 words long. This is hardly a substantial difference. Moreover, the WP:LEAD is meant to be redundant. It's against MOS for information to be only in the lead, so everything in the lead must come from the article. The PAP is extremely important for Singaporean politics, having continuous national dominance. Lastly, LEAD guidelines allow up to four paragraphs, so there's no reason to change a consensus agreed lead of an almost equal length to try and reformat it into three paragraphs. CMD (talk) 05:18, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I completely agree with you on this matter. Any political party can be dominant in any country and can win elections since its inception but politics should be mentioned in the political section not on top section of a country article don't you think so?. You can visit numerous other country articles to get a clear picture. If consensus has built on that issue could you please show me that "consensus page". I would like to say Singapore article shouldn't be no different from other good country related articles. Thanks-- ♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪  ߷  ♀ Contribs ♀ 05:29, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Talk:Singapore/2011 archive. The lead should summarise important points about the country. In Singapore's case, it has more or less functioned as a single party state for much of its history, albeit a democratically approved one. The lead would be sorely deficient without this, just as India's lead would be lacking if it didn't mention it was a multicultural federal state. CMD (talk) 07:07, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Ok keep that section and am removing the lead tag.-- ♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪  ߷  ♀ Contribs ♀ 04:14, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Genre of Outlook.com
Hello, Kkm010

I'd like to discuss the issue of type in Outlook.com article with you. You have added webmail, email and web application but these terms are mostly redundant and only confuse the reader.

First, email: Outlook.com is definitely not email; it can send email but it is not email itself. If you meant "email client", well "webmail" already say that.

Second, web application: Again, all webmails are web applications. (Yes, I know that webmail also means webmail provider, but again, a webmail provider without a webmail client is not webmail provider; it is an ordinary email provider.)

Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 08:23, 3 August 2012 (UTC)


 * I'm also confused could you please tell what is the basic difference between E-mail vs Webmail ? Secondly what about gmail, hotmail and yahoo mail some say they are e-mail other say they are webmail which one is true? basically e-mail or webmail is type of web applications that's for sure. I agree it does confuse other readers. Thanks-- ♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪  ߷  ♀ Contribs ♀ 09:09, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Hello. Kkm010


 * "Email" is a digital message that we send or receive; it is a method of exchanging information digitally. It comprises of text, pictures, video and digital attachments. "Webmail" is a type of web application used to send and receive "emails". It is short for "web-based email service". (You can study their articles if you want.) Gmail, Hotmail and Yahoo! Mail are webmails. Google, Microsoft and Yahoo! are "webmail providers". We also have traditional email providers. My ISP is one. It has no web interface; I use my Mail app on my cellphone or Mozilla Thunderbird on my PC to retrieve my emails.


 * You say "some say that..." Who are these "some"? But again, is what "some" say really important, i.e. does it have due weight? If you are referring to colloquial speech, you might be right (e.g. someone might say "this is an email" instead of "this is an email service") but we don't use colloquial speech in Wikipedia articles.


 * Best regards,
 * Codename Lisa (talk) 05:08, 4 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks, for that information now I would change Gmail, Hotmail and Yahoo! Mail as webmail rather mentioning them as web application.-- ♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪  ߷  ♀ Contribs ♀ 05:13, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Inappropriate accusation of vandalism in Volkswagen Group
Edits that are made in good faith, supported by citations and follow Wikipedia guidelines are never vandalism. Your statement that a user is vandalizing the Volkswagen Group article is inappropriate. To focus on just one area in which you are in error, your repeated reversions have re-introduced a number of violations of WP:ACCESS to the infobox. The relevant guideline was cited in the edit notes, yet you clearly did not take the time to familiarize yourself with it. Please do so. If you are going to cite bureaucratic baloney and make accusations and threats, it's a good idea to make sure you own house is in order. In this particular example, it definitely is not. 71.212.77.233 (talk) 05:12, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * If you continue to make bullshit edits they are going to be removed.-- ♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪  ߷  ♀ Contribs ♀ 05:14, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Hello, I'm 71.212.77.233. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Volkswagen Group, because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.212.77.233 (talk) 05:16, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Your edits violate at least one important guideline. If held to account, you will not be able to justify your actions. Please re-consider before you embarass yourself further.71.212.77.233 (talk) 05:20, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Your edits are unacceptable and they are going to reverted.-- ♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪  ߷  ♀ Contribs ♀ 05:21, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Despite being specifically referred to WP:ACCESS, you refuse to describe how your edits are justified. You are in clear violation of WP guidelines. You are failing to engage in constructive dialogue and are making edits that can not possibly be justified. This isn't looking good for you. Please stop before you embarrass yourself more than you already have.71.212.77.233 (talk) 05:26, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Volkswagen Group. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.
 * I have looked at both GM and Toyota as you suggested and both are full of WP:ACCESS errors and other mistakes. Those really aren't good examples of "proper" infoboxes for a company. Also, it's worth noting that auto manufacturers don't have special infobox guidelines; all companies follow the same, standard format. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.212.77.233 (talk) 05:57, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Volkswagen, you may be blocked from editing. Despite repeated requests for clarification, you have provided no feedback and no justification for your edits. Please re-consider your position. Your edits are unfair to those with less than perfect vision and do not align with the guideines laid out in the infobox company template.71.212.77.233 (talk) 06:01, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=|link=]] This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Volkswagen, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 71.212.77.233 (talk) 06:09, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Can someone explain what the problem is here? Which specific WP:ACCESS guidelines are being ignored here? I don't see why we have to give the company name in UPPER CASE - legal documents usually have their own peculiar editorial style, and I don't think we really need to follow it in a WP article. I'd use an annual report or similar source to determine how a company usually present their name. Regards, Letdorf (talk) 19:40, 17 August 2012 (UTC).
 * You will know everything once protection is over. That IP user putting bullshit stuff in the infobox and not co-operating at all.-- ♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪  ߷  ♀ Contribs ♀ 04:33, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.212.77.233 (talk) 06:29, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * For reference only, here's the link to the discussion. Here's another discussion, same subject, a little earlier. Swliv (talk) 23:00, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Your addition to the Dell article
Hi KKM010, I think that you were the one that place the comment about not addng External Links to the page on Dell, so I just want to let you know that because I don't think such a requirement is needed nor wanted I mentiod this on the Dell Talk page to start a discussion on it and see if we can reach concensus. As I don't know if you are actively following this page but do think that your motivation to add this to the page is important I send you this message. Once read you can just delete this section on your Talk page if you want. Cheers, Tonkie (talk) 14:47, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
 * If you want to remove that comment ok. Its not a big deal. But remember the business data should be there.-- ♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪  ߷  ♀ Contribs ♀ 04:10, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Accuracy of "Google" page
Hi Kkm010,

I don't have permission to edit the Google page as it's a semi-protected article, so I wanted to suggest an edit to you as you were the last person to modify the page.

In question is the following line: "In a talk at Stanford University, Marissa Mayer, Google's Vice President of Search Products and User Experience, showed that half of all new product launches at the time had originated from the Innovation Time Off.[198]"

Marissa Mayer is still labeled as working for Google, while she's now the CEO of Yahoo (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marissa_Mayer).

Hopefully you can take care of this.

Thanks!

Davidmetcalfe (talk) 18:25, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Need your input
You may want to comment here about contradiction between IMF and World Bank data pertaining to India's GDP (nominal) in 2011. Should you wish to respond, your feedback will be highly appreciated. Mrt 3366   (Talk page?)   11:54, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Removal of UN List
Why are you removing the UN list from List of countries by GDP (nominal), as you have done here, when no such consensus was achieved at the talk page to do so? Am i missing something? Thanks, and a talkback template would be appreciated on my talk page. Anir1uph | talk | contrib 14:11, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry for my actions.-- ♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪  ߷  ♀ Contribs ♀ 15:14, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

RGupta
I see you've found your way into the "list" discussion. I also see you've made no contribution to the Talk page on the subject. I've tended at length to agree with you but I'd also disagree with your Edit summary comment there's no consensus. I've been away from the article mostly for a while but my impression was that there were two, then three, editors, including myself in both cases, really regularly focusing on the article. The two and then the three did reach consensus, I think you'll find; one at least wanted the list and we agreed.

A lot of work's gone into the article. I hope you can join the dialogue on it if it's a major concern to you. I can't tell for sure what your read is, from your Aug. 18 Edit comment. If you go to the Talk, I'll go too, see how it all looks. Please let me know here if you're going there: I'll check back here for a response.

I will note that the underlying legal case is still on appeal. The article has ridden the legal and pre-legal rounds, one by one. Until the case is concluded, I've leaned toward allowing more to stay. I lost out on the calving off of the side-article but it's still there, just a step less accessible. It's a long process. I hope you can join in in that spirit. Thanks and cheers. Swliv (talk) 21:52, 4 September 2012 (UTC)


 * I'm not interested in this article. Previously I edited twice and twice my edit has been revered since another user is keen to put that list, whereas I find it as bullshit. If you can convince him then go ahead.-- ♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪  ߷  ♀ Contribs ♀ 04:54, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Edits to St. Stephen's College, Delhi
I have looked at your recent edits and find them peculiar. This diff perplexes me. You have changed a number of things in the article in a manner that seems to change it to be about another institution entirely, and not provided edit summaries. I am undoing them pending justification by you should you reinstate them. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 12:33, 5 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Your edit summary in this diff is highly misleading. I have taken your point about it being a college infobox, but the remainder of your edits, since they are unexplained, look like vandalism. I have reverted those on that basis. Please justify them properly if you reinstate them, or I will be forced to consider them as vandalism. St Sphene's College is not, surely, St Xavier's College. I see nothing in your edits to indicate that there is any reason for them, save only for the college element. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 12:23, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Kelly Services (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Consulting


 * Randstad India (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Dutch

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Carnival Corporation & plc (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Cruise


 * Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Cruise

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Manpower Logo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Manpower Logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:23, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * High tech (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Startups


 * Walmart (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Cash & carry

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:08, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hitachi Consulting, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Division (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

India Economy Section Images
There is a voting process going on for selection of Images for Economy section of the India article. Voting ends on 15th November 2012. -- Anbu121 ( talk me ) 22:19, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

OpenGL Infobox
You recently reverted the edits I made to the infobox of the OpenGL page. I provided a detailed rationale for both edits, and you've left no record of your reasons for reverting them. Could I get an explanation, please? 77.101.163.231 (talk) 15:16, 20 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Since it's been two days with no response, I'm going to go ahead and revert your reversions. I'll check this talkpage again in a couple of days, in case you want to discuss it further. 77.101.163.231 (talk) 15:18, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Essel Group, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Media (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:57, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Compass Group
When there is so much to do in WP it is exceptionally tedious to waste time edit warring on minor points. Can you please familiarise yourself with what Compass Group actually does: and  - it provides a wide range of services to businesses, including contract catering and other support services which have no connection with food.

How can this be described as a "hospitality" company? Rangoon11 (talk) 12:04, 4 November 2012 (UTC)


 * OK my dear friend I agree with you. Since "support services" term is bit vague that why I thought hospitality would be better as catering related activities do fall under hospitality, any way if you're happy with the term "support services" I have no problem. Cheers-- ♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪  ߷  ♀ Contribs ♀ 14:05, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

List of highest-grossing Bollywood films
I'm afraid that for copyright reasons, we cannot use the top five rankings by Box Office India. While the situation at this article is deplorable, there is nothing we can do about it until permission is provided by Box Office India to use more of the list or the higher numbers on the list. Permission was sought, but they declined. If you have questions, you're welcome to come by my talk page, or discuss them at the talk page of the list, but please do not revert again. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:56, 14 November 2012 (UTC)


 * If you see List of highest-grossing films they use "Box office mojo" as principal source and have no problem with it. why is "Box Office India" would have problem if something is taken from their source! strange.-- ♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪  ߷  ♀ Contribs ♀ 14:01, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Box Office Mojo is a factual compilation of sales figures. Box Office India uses guesswork. It's educated guesswork, but it's not fact. We consulted with the attorneys for the Wikimedia Foundation on this one, and the article was handled in accordance with their advice. Again, it's a deplorable situation, but we don't really have any choice until and unless BOI decides to allow us to use the numbers. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:05, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Actually I was bit surprised. Anyway, I have no problem with it whatever you guys think is correct and fair do it.-- ♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪  ߷  ♀ Contribs ♀ 14:11, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

correction about this picture
hi there, pakistan is the first country of the world who started the bio metric passport for general public. but your image shows that pakistan have no ability to print a bio metric passport while pakistan is the first country. kindly correct it.

thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tariqtns (talk • contribs) 14:00, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Foxconn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fortune (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:04, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

indian american
if u wish to include images of ur favourites persons, kindly include them in a new row, but do not undo images that indicate diverse communities, u cant put in ur POV by including pics of a certain community. Minihifi (talk) 19:22, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

About Parno Mittra edit
Greetings, about this edit, Mittra did not study in Calcutta University, she was a student of St. Xaviers College which is affiliated under Calcutta University. There are hundreds of more college which are governed by Calcutta University. Best, Tito Dutta (talk) 11:35, 18 November 2012 (UTC)


 * The source doesn't state that she studied in that college if you can find a suitable source, you are free to add.-- ♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪  ߷  ♀ Contribs ♀ 14:01, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Dainik Jagran cover 03-28-10.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Dainik Jagran cover 03-28-10.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 06:01, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Indian american
kindly stop adding ur favourite people, images of notable people from atleast one community must be added Lathyruss (talk) 08:25, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

american indian
what do u mean already there??? okay then i will replace it with other name which was already there instead of and will retain norah jones, stop POV pushing and vandalising the page ever again OKAY ??? Lathyruss (talk) 14:46, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Starbucks
You changed some figures from 2011 values to 2012 values - but you did not provide a new source. If you change the figures, you also need to update the citation to a source for those figures as well. Thank you. Yworo (talk) 20:41, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Indian american - stop ur non sense again and again
how many times i should tell u? kindly add three more pics in a separate row, that will solve the issue Lathyruss (talk) 09:23, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Hii
STOP YOUR NON SENSE AGAIN AND AGAIN, add ur Favorite person in a different row Lathyruss (talk) 10:15, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Azim Premji, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gujarati (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Economy of the United States
Why did you take back my updated figures for Economy of the United States when they were more recent? What is your reasoning for doing that? Can you tell me what possible reason you had? Thanks. --Katydidit (talk) 11:50, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Narayana Murthy
Your recent editing history at N. R. Narayana Murthy shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. ''You should be discussing your continuous changes to the infobox rather than stubbornly reinserting them. Edit-warring is not the answer to a content dispute.'' --- Tib42 (talk) 16:31, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Toshiba, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Elevators (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:21, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Narayana Murthy
So what if the top paragraph was there from the beginning? I am only improving the article. Please state exactly what you object to? Do you object to him being named an entrepreneur? (Rtat (talk) 06:07, 25 December 2012 (UTC))

Your recent editing history at N. R. Narayana Murthy shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. ''You should be discussing your continuous changes to the infobox rather than stubbornly reinserting them. Edit-warring is not the answer to a content dispute.'' (Rtat (talk) 06:08, 25 December 2012 (UTC))
 * My dear friend I appreciate the work you are doing why change the top para since it was there from the very beginning. Before you came to the party many editors tried to add bullshit materials about that person. You can see in his talk page. Several times this article had been damaged therefore please leave the top para. Please don't get me wrong I really appreciate for your tireless contributions.-- ♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪  ߷  ♀ Contribs ♀ 09:06, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
 * While I appreciate what you say, I do not follow why him being called an 'entrepreneur' is 'bullshit'. This is self-evident. As are some of his biographical details like chief mentor, for which I have inserted a reference. This is the first time this rank was used at a corporate level in India. You still have not clearly stated why you object to the specific changes made. So what if an article is contentious? It does not mean that you cannot make any more changes to it. I am suggesting very reasonable changes and if you wish to discuss WHY you object to them then do so. Else it is not appropriate for you to roll them back. You are editing an article on the Tata group, which is inherently contentious and yet you continue to make changes. Why is that ok whereas what I am suggesting not? (Rtat (talk) 13:23, 25 December 2012 (UTC))
 * I would appreciate if you fix the Tata Group article. That article is in mess and it has to be fixed. As far as Murthy is concern I think you can call him an entrepreneur if you wish.-- ♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪  ߷  ♀ Contribs ♀ 13:47, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:34, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

AN notification
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:14, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Network 18 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to MD


 * The Times Group (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to MD

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Degree pages
Do you have any reliable sources that indicate those various degrees you redirected together are, in fact, the same basic degree? If not, your saying that they are the same is original research. Qwyrxian (talk) 10:16, 6 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Hi, well actually both the degrees do have almost same course. The basic difference is there name. I have a BCA degree and this degree is common in India. Both the degrees are conducted by AICTE a recognized body of the Government of India. Different universities either have BCA or BSIT degree. Depending upon which student prefer what.-- ♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪  ߷  ♀ Contribs ♀ 14:25, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Oh, I believe you, but unless a reliable source actually says that they're the same, then you're doing original research to declare them the same. Wikipedians aren't allowed to look at two different subjects, analyze their components, and declare them to be the same thing. Unless you can substantiate that with refs, I think we need to revert those redirects. Qwyrxian (talk) 14:30, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Well you can check this source or or  still if have doubt then you can revert it. Thanks-- ♥ Kkm010 ♥  ♪ Talk ♪  ߷  ♀ Contribs ♀ 14:38, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Information technology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Devices (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Infosys BPO Limited, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Division (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Bharat Petroleum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Fortune


 * Hindustan Petroleum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Fortune


 * Sony (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Electronic

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 22 January 2013 (UTC)