User talk:Kkmk mani

Welcome!
Hello, Kkmk mani, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Michael Koutsilieris, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * How to write a great article
 * The perfect article

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 15:23, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Michael Koutsilieris


A tag has been placed on Draft:Michael Koutsilieris requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://physiology.med.uoa.gr/fileadmin/physiology.med.uoa.gr/uploads/CV/Koutsilieris.pdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa (talk) 15:23, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael N. Koutsilieris (December 13)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SL93 was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Michael N. Koutsilieris and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Michael N. Koutsilieris, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Michael_N._Koutsilieris Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SL93&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Michael_N._Koutsilieris reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SL93 (talk) 00:09, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

February 2021
Hello Kkmk mani. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Kkmk mani. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 16:20, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

I am most certainly not receiving or expect to receive any compesation for my edits. Since I am still new at this I guess I missed the part where i should provide the required disclosure. Pls provide further advise. Is there sth i should include in the artice ?? Kkmk mani (talk) 16:35, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
 * If you aren't paid, then you don't need to disclose that. Do you have an unpaid association with Dr. Koutsilieris? 331dot (talk) 16:39, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

I have attended some of his lectures but editing the article was my initiative.Kkmk mani (talk) 16:41, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Have you communicated with him about your draft? How are you aware that people request information on him? 331dot (talk) 16:44, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I recomended his lectures to friends and they tried to retrieve information on WP, should I try to contact him ?Kkmk mani (talk) 16:48, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
 * No; if you communicate with him about the draft it would be a conflict of interest. You are welcome to proceed, although I would think the doctor's employer would have biographical information on a website. Please review my post to you at the Teahouse. In short, we don't just want a text describing what he has done, but describing what others say about him. 331dot (talk) 16:51, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you very much. I have read your post and I will try to edit the article according to your suggestions. Accept my apologies for any trouble i caused you Kkmk mani (talk) 16:54, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Michael N. Koutsilieris
Hello, Kkmk mani. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Michael N. Koutsilieris, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:03, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Michael N. Koutsilieris


Hello, Kkmk mani. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Michael N. Koutsilieris".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:33, 27 August 2022 (UTC)