User talk:KkonradD

October 2017
Hello, I'm General Ization. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Rock 'n' Roll Is King have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  General Ization  Talk   18:54, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Edit warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 20:15, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * If I see you continuing to revert to restore disputed content without getting consensus for the changes you want to make, I will block your account. You are edit warring across multiple articles over a long period and it must stop.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 20:15, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
 * This is where you need to make your case regarding the polish charts, not in edit summaries.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 20:20, 13 December 2018 (UTC)