User talk:Kks26 keerthi

Reply
Hi, thanks for message. I deleted your article because
 * it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to an organisation or company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the organisation claims or interviewing its management. Most of your text was unreferenced, and the references you did give were not to independent third-party sources but to Facebook, wordpress and the like. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced or self-sourced claims presented as fact include: In this era of mediocrity, handmade items still reflects natural love. With the uniqueness in appearance handmade items helps us to save our environment too. Buying handmade is win-win situation : You enrich your life with beautiful handmade goods, and you enable an artist to continue following their creative dreams... The hand is natural and hard working. While the machine kills nature, jobs, the hand protects nature, generates work and generates welfare. While the machine makes wealth for a few, the hand distributes it... has a deep spiritual significance. We shall demand a better deal for the handmade. We shall change the production process.&mdash; fact-free spam, as is the rest of the article. Wikipedia is not free advertising.
 * the article was a copyright violation of various pages, including this. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial but there is no indication that the copied site allows free use. Text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient. But in any case the copyrighted text is far too promotional to be useful for Wikipedia's purposes, so there would not be any point in your jumping through all the hoops that are required.
 *  so that we can edit the page and work on &mdash; who is "we"? If you have a conflict of interest when editing this article, you must declare it. You have an obvious conflict of interest and you must declare it. If you work directly or indirectly for an organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, if you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:    . If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message.

We often restore deleted text on request, but for legal reasons we don't do so for copyright violations. In any case, there was little factual content in your draft, just spam so better to start from scratch.

The draft article isn't yet protected from creation, but before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article, it's clear that the editors of this article have just dumped copied text from elsewhere without any attempt to read, let alone follow, our guidelines.

I note that this account has made no edits other than to my talk page, and that most of the contributors have made few if any edits other than to that draft. Note that abusing multiple accounts can lead to a block, and so can joint editing on behalf of an organisation

You, and any other editors concerned. must reply to the COI request above, otherwise I'll take appropriate action.

Jimfbleak - talk to me?  07:13, 27 February 2018 (UTC)