User talk:Kku/Archive 2

Happy Earth day!
 Happy Earth Day!   Hello! Wishing you a Happy Earth day on the behalf of WikiProject Environment and ''WikiProject Ecology.

What is this?
 * Earth Day is an annual event celebrated around the world on April 22 to demonstrate support for environmental protection. First celebrated in 1970, it now includes events coordinated globally by the Earth Day Network in more than 193 countries.

What you can do!!
 * Actively participate in our Wikiprojects.
 * Promote an awareness of the natural environment and world.
 * Tag and assess articles under the scope of these projects.
 * Patrol articles related to environmental protection.
 * Maintain articles listed at List of controversial issues, WikiProject Environment/Popular pages, WikiProject Ecology, etc.
 * Participate in the delsort. and so on...

Newly nominated content
 * Energy in Turkey
 * Energy policy of Turkey
 * Electricity sector in Turkey

Similar events
 * Earth Hour
 * International Day of Forests
 * International Mother Earth Day
 * World Environment Day
 * World Soil Day
 * World Water Day



-- -- --- Discuss this newsletter

Unsubscribe (Ecology)

Unsubscribe (Environment) --- Sent by (talk) on behalf of WikiProject Environment and its related projects. © Copyleft 2020 Wikiproject Holidays

WikiProject Ecology

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:51, 22 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Thanks, same to you! I cannot but realize just how much Earth there is around me. -- Kku (talk) 08:17, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Plastic Pollution Coalition for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Plastic Pollution Coalition is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Plastic Pollution Coalition until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 14:22, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Barbara Casini for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Barbara Casini is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Barbara Casini until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vmavanti (talk) 22:29, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Vmavanti (talk) 19:09, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Do you know of any sources in English that talk about her?

Ruud Jacobs moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Ruud Jacobs, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 21:16, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
 * oh, wow. zealousness roams the wp again. -- Kku (talk) 21:36, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Südwestdeutsche Medien Holding moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Südwestdeutsche Medien Holding, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  DGG ( talk ) 23:35, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The patrolling workforce appears to have increased lately. Where are all the writers? What happened to them? I am very concerned. -- Kku (talk) 06:08, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Climate and energy for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Climate and energy, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Climate and energy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ruud Jacobs (January 16)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ruud Jacobs and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ruud Jacobs, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Ruud_Jacobs Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Theroadislong&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Ruud_Jacobs reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 22:41, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Information creation
Hi a few weeks ago you created Information creation as a disambiguation page. I’m a bit puzzled by it. First, we don’t have disambiguation pages with only two elements, and second it’s not clear to me why “information creation” could mean “information retrieval”. So I’m not really seeing the purpose of the page at all. Am I missing something? Thanks Mccapra (talk) 04:06, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I will try to be of help. Your first point is merely and entirely formal and I will not argue with that. If there exist two homonyms which are used in a markedly different sense, they must be disambiguated, however you do it. As to the second point: In general usage, and especially so in marketing blurb, "information retrieval" from hitherto untapped sources, especially in an automated way, is gladly confused with "creation of new information". Examples of this can also be found on WP prior to the article in question (see Informetrics). In other contexts, people talk about information creation in the sense "we are publishing new insights" (on a webpage, etc.). This is clearly a different thing, because somebody uses their creativity to produce sth. qualitatively new, i.e. new content. Of course, we are close to a twilight zone here, but a) I am not in a position to argue for or against conservation of information at this point and b) the problem already starts with the ubiquitous confusion between data (or content) and information. See e.g. DIKW pyramid. So at the level of "information production" we are already fighting against the consequences of unclear higher concepts. Hope my motivation becomes clearer now. -- Kku (talk) 08:11, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Südwestdeutsche Medien Holding


Hello, Kku. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Südwestdeutsche Medien Holding".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 00:06, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

May 2021
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Sound Attenuators. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Requests for history merge. Thank you. Polyamorph (talk) 16:22, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Seeking feedback
Hi! In the past, you commented on the Communication theory page, and now I've written a replacement article (discussion at Talk:communication_theory). I'm eager for feedback on the overhaul -- I put the new article in my sandbox.Kaylea Champion (talk) 22:20, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply; I like the idea of trying to "rehome" what's in the current article into either a new page or finding it a home in the info theory page. I'll give it a try; info theory isn't a specialty of mine but I've been meaning to learn it....! Kaylea Champion (talk) 16:13, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Ruud Jacobs
Hello, Kku. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ruud Jacobs, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ruud Jacobs (July 11)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ruud Jacobs and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ruud Jacobs, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Ruud_Jacobs Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Theroadislong&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Ruud_Jacobs reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 09:44, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Südwestdeutsche Medien Holding
Hello, Kku. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Südwestdeutsche Medien Holding, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

Indirect land use change impacts of biofuels
Indirect land use change impacts of biofuels has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Chidgk1 (talk) 15:35, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Merger discussion for stv.tv
An article that you have been involved in editing&mdash;stv.tv&mdash;has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. GMc (talk?) 13:29, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Plant resources moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Plant resources, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 13:08, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Many people variously refer to "plant resources" without specific scope. So this was obviously meant as sth. along the lines of Wikipedia outlines, indicating the levels of where plants are used and a rough hierarchy. These outlines do not very often contain references. In such cases, forcing additional content into the article for formal reasons alone does not always improve the usefulness of the contents. -- Kku (talk) 13:26, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
 * hi thanks for your message. I was a bit mystified by this article. I wondered if it was intended to be a disambiguation page or if it was just an initial sketch of something larger. I didn’t think of it being an outline but if there isn’t substantially more to it, I’m not sure an outline is needed. The relationship between the top level concept and the blue linked articles didn’t seem clear to me either, and without sources I’m afraid it looked like an odd piece of original research. Mccapra (talk) 23:08, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Orlandus Wilson


The article Orlandus Wilson has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Stub on non-notable person, and no reason or ability to expand. He's a member of the Golden Gate Quartet, which has a long article. He's not independently notable. The scant info in this article -- birth year, vocal range -- is in that article already, so no merge. And there's nothing about him in that article to bring over here and make a proper article. Anything new about him that comes to light can go into that article."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Herostratus (talk) 17:59, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Analytics vs analysis
Hi there,

Hopefully you are doing well!

A long time ago, in the article "Analytics," you wrote "Thus, analytics is not so much concerned with individual analyses or analysis steps, but with the entire methodology. There is a pronounced tendency to use the term analytics in business settings (e.g. text analytics vs. the more generic text mining), presumably to lay emphasis on the interdisciplinary and integrative aspect.": https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Analytics&oldid=500770361

Would you happen to have source for this info? Tommyren (talk) 18:00, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
 * I noticed that the original paragraph has been ref.ed and modified anyway. But, if you insist: https://www.bmc.com/blogs/data-analytics-vs-data-analysis/ and others found by: https://www.startpage.com/do/dsearch?query=data+analytics+vs.+analysis+&cat=web&pl=ext-ff&language=english&extVersion=1.3.0 . Besides, there was a lot of (painful) personal experience behind this insight. Just take a peek into the business intelligence business. The difference will jump into your face. -- Kku (talk) 09:11, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Fuel efficiency in aircraft
Hi, I noticed you were linking Fuel efficiency from many aircraft articles. Note there is a more specific article Fuel economy in aircraft if you want to link to instead. Bye!--Marc Lacoste (talk) 15:54, 30 January 2022 (UTC) thanks for pinging me if you reply as i don't follow your talk page
 * That's definitely something to watch and take into account! Thank you! -- Kku (talk) 19:12, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Südwestdeutsche Medien Holding


Hello, Kku. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Südwestdeutsche Medien Holding".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:50, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank's everybody for their great oversight to ensure that every single byte be saved for such relevance as the blisters on Beyonce's butt or something in this vein. Where would WP end if sparsity and efficiency didn't rule througout. I am eternally grateful to be part of a community that absolutely knows precious knowledge from waste and works 24/7 to ensure a constructive environment. -- Kku (talk) 08:49, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

"Pro-life" v "anti-abortion"
Please be aware we normally use "anti-abortion" rather than "pro-life", especially in links, as pro-life redirects to Anti-abortion movements. See the FAQ on the talk page there. Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 10:16, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I am well aware of this. The point is that the articles I just changed very often unabashedly and consciously(?) do use the euphemistic version. I did not bother to change that, since a change in wording would probably fuel more discussion than useful. I am very willing, however, to discuss ways to nudge WP towards a less biased phrasing style. -- Kku (talk) 10:53, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of NAPAW


A tag has been placed on NAPAW requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
 * disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
 * is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Fram (talk) 08:11, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
 * If admins were half as alert on tracking down advertisements, fandom, and outright bullshit, WP could be a better place indeed. -- Kku (talk) 08:14, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm not an admin, and I tag all kinds of pages for speedy deletion. So not clear what your point actually is, or how it is in any way a reason not to delete your article. Fram (talk) 11:13, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
 * While tagging articles for deletion might also be useful for keeping proliferation of nonsense articles, the page I have created to my mind is on a par with other red links - neither too useful, but certainly not harmful (until somebody proves that the NAPAW is indeed an irrelevant congregation, at any rate). In general, few of the WP recommendations should be taken as strict policies, just my 2 cents. -- Kku (talk) 11:31, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Plant resources
Hello, Kku. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Plant resources, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:00, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Automated edits in Spanish Wikipedia
Hola Kku, I have seen that you are maybe doing automated edits in the Spanish Wikipedia where you create internal links in pages related to the campain #WikiForHumanRights. How do you do it? Recently an article was created: Gleba (micología) and there are many articles about funga where it would be great that the word "gleba" in them is linked to this new article. Can you do it? Cheers, Cbrescia (talk) 17:26, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Hola Cbrescia, I am glad that you ask. In fact the tools that you ask for have become indispensable to me, faced with the sheer amount of text that sifting through manually would make the task virtually impossible. So, here we go. There is


 * 1) http://edwardbetts.com/find_link/ - a very fine tool that partially automates the task - available for all languages, although, mind you, not flaw-free for non-English ones (it appears there are at least some rules for stemming built in)
 * 2) my shell script adaptation of pywikibot with its ready made scripts/replace.py module that reduces the routine to automated search for patterns, automatic replacement of patterns and the user only clicking y or n on the command line for approval or dismissal of the suggested edits. Caution: the filtering is heavily dependent on the order and combination of filters you give and can slow down the process to unbearable. If you are interested, I can provide you with the list of filtering parameters I use that just so happens to work satisfatorily for body text pattern searches. -- Kku (talk) 06:53, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
 * On a side note: simple search replace for terms that have an ambiguity in them and need to be qualified further is a little trickier, as you might have suspected. I have experimented with it and couldn't find a solution that worked right all the time. It is probably best to pywikibot here, because it will allow arbitrary replacements, not just simple hyperlinking of the search term. -- Kku (talk) 06:58, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Hola Kku, thanks for the response! I undertand what you are saying but I think I have to deepen my knowledge in this type of automated edits in order to do them. But now I have an idea on how to tackle this. Best regards, Cbrescia (talk) 17:12, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
 * You are very welcome. If you are not conversant in scripting (on Linux, preferentially) then of course it's best to play around with "Find Link" first. When you feel like you have more specific questions, feel free to contact me again, I'll be glad to be of help. -- Kku (talk) 07:55, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Kku

Thank you for creating ChemIDplus.

User:Dr vulpes, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
 * Thanks for the flowers. You forgot the Trump era effects part. Just saying. -- Kku (talk) 06:55, 1 July 2022 (UTC)


 * You're more than welcome to add it back in if you like. I thought it would be better to be more conservative with the edit since it was being added to an article and community I wasn't super familiar with. I'm a psychologist not a chemist, I know where my expertise ends :-). I do feel that if there was going to be a mention of funding cuts to NIH/NLM (particularly political cuts) it might warrant its own section in the article because more things were but during that time then just the ChemIDplus database.  Dr vulpes  (💬 • 📝) 07:09, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Alright. I see your point. Maybe very cautiously in a more general paragraph. :) -- Kku (talk) 12:49, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

"Violence in movies" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Violence in movies and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 3 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. –LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄ ) 11:38, 3 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Information.svg Hello, I'm LaundryPizza03. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 3 that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza</b><b style="color:#b00">03</b> ( d  c̄ ) 05:02, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
 * One is not allowed to express amazement? Or provide specific arguments in favor of some content? I wasn't aware of this. Thank you for making your point. -- Kku (talk) 07:06, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
 * No, expressing amazement is allowed. However, I interpreted it as baselessly accusing someone of one-track deletionism, which could be a personal attack. –<b style="color:#77b">Laundry</b><b style="color:#fb0">Pizza</b><b style="color:#b00">03</b> ( d c̄ ) 07:48, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I am quite certain that you would immediately recognize one-track deletionism if it came your way. -- Kku (talk) 08:34, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of William Schiøpffe


The article William Schiøpffe has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Doesn't pas WP:GNG and only had one reference."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Dr vulpes  (💬 • 📝) 05:06, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of William Schiøpffe for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article William Schiøpffe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/William Schiøpffe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.  Dr vulpes  (💬 • 📝) 21:37, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Kku!
<div style="border: 3px solid #FFD700; background-color: #FFFAF0; padding:0.2em 0.4em; height:auto; min-height:173px; border-radius:1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);" class="plainlinks">

Happy New Year! Kku, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. See this for background context.

— Moops  ⋠ T ⋡ 18:22, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops  ⋠ T ⋡ 18:22, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of NantWorks for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NantWorks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/NantWorks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Rhadow (talk) 01:09, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

NOTAMS
Kennst Du vielleicht jemanden, der in dieses Thema etwas Licht bringen könnte? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:2023_Black_Sea_drone_incident#Airspace Die Frage ist, wo und wann hat Russland seine Erklärung zum "temporary airspace regime" über der Krim abgegeben und wie sieht dieses Gebiet aus? Entweder weiß jemand, wie man gezielt nach diesen Daten sucht, oder jemand kann die verfügbaren Datenhaufen mit einem Script so durchsuchen, dass man nicht Tage braucht, um den richtigen Datensatz zu finden.  Manorainjan  16:58, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Hyperlinks
Hello Kku,

Thank you for your comments on my Talk Page. You are most definitely correct - leaf litter is important to most rainforests and to a few species of Sarcochilus. However, it is most unlikely that a reader of either article would stop to read the article about leaf litter. Most (all?) readers know what leaf litter is. The purpose of a link is to aid understanding, not because the linked word or phrase is important.

The Manual of Style/Linking is worth a read, especially the sections on underlinking, overlinking and.

I'm happy to continue this discussion here, or on my Talk Page. Gderrin (talk) 21:37, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Note
is a problem but the real issue is that the original is explaining that "pileus" is the technical term for the Cap. Please stop looking for terms that might be changed in mass edits. That kind of editing requires bot approval as indicated above. Johnuniq (talk) 23:22, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
 * It's hard to believe, but that was absolute manual and accidental oversight. Thanks for drawing my attention to it. Of course the link would have been better placed on pileus instead of cap, but that's another matter. -- Kku (talk) 09:08, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Burnin Red Ivanhoe


The article Burnin Red Ivanhoe has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable band which fails WP:NBAND. Has lacked any references for months now and doesn't look like it would survive an AFD."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:35, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vladimir Kunin


The article Vladimir Kunin has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Entirely unsourced for nearly 8 years. Unclear claim to notability."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:46, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

0634352123 154.115.223.80 (talk) 01:39, 5 April 2024 (UTC)


 * +252-634352123 ? Kku (talk) 08:27, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hi Kku. Thank you for your work on Lantheus Holdings. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 14:09, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hi Kku. Thank you for your work on Burnin Red Ivanhoe. Another editor, Boleyn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Boleyn (talk) 19:40, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi Kku, thank you for your work on Guyana Sugar Corporation.

I work in the corporate affairs team at Tate & Lyle Sugars. We’d like to request a correction is made to this page - Guyana Sugar Corporation specifically, the line: “The company was formed in 1976, when the government of Guyana nationalised and merged the sugar estates operated by Booker Sugar Estates Limited, Tate and Lyle and Jessels Holdings to form the Guyana Sugar Corporation.” Tate & Lyle (in any guise/ownership) has never owned or invested in any plantation in Guyana. This is confirmed on the Guyana Sugar Corporation’s own website (https://guysuco.gy/our-company/) which states: “By 1967, there were eighteen (18) estates: serving eleven (11) factories, nine of which were owned and/or managed by Booker McConnell Limited, the other two, by the Demerara Company. In 1973, the ownership of the sugar industry was in the hands of two London-based companies – Jessels Securities which owned two factories and accounted for about fifteen percent (15%) of the total sugar production; five percent (5%) was produced by an independent Guyanese factory, owned by the Vieiras and eighty percent (80%) by Booker McConnell.” Once you and any other interested parties have reviewed our requested correction and the relevant sources, please could you remove any reference to Tate and Lyle on this page. Thank you. Sugarclc (talk) 10:18, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Sustainable production
Hello, Kku. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sustainable production, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:05, 20 June 2024 (UTC)