User talk:Kkvv

VK seems a worthy subject for an article, but if you would like the article to remain you must write it in the WP style, which includes:

looking like an encyclopedia article not a CV (use asterisks for lists, just as I did) saying in the first sentence something to demonstrate notability, like professor of X at, winner of the XYZ prize and N honorary doctorate (whatever applies). Use the exact word: "notable"; do not use "famous" not going into disproportionate personal details listing college degrees with university and year -- and putting the university names in double brackets listing important awards listing important memberships and offices held listing books published as formal references style: Author, title, Publisher, year ISBN if possible. listing some major published papers, say how many. and, most important, giving some 3rd party sources. A website at a university etc. can be one, but it cannot be the only one. Book reviews are fine, or a newspaper stories. Print or web is OK, but not from a list or a blog.

There is serious prejudice here against articles written by the subject or a member of his family, so it has to be a really solid article. See WP:AUTO and WP:COI These is unfortunately, prejudice against people from the academic world. Look at similar articles.

If you do not do this immediately, the article will probably be deleted in a day or two--though not by me. I apologize for not having the time to help personally. DGG 02:07, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Vlado Kotnik
I have nominated Vlado Kotnik, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Vlado Kotnik&. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TRAVELLINGCARI My storyTell me yours 22:39, 9 March 2008 (UTC)