User talk:Kkwiki1000

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Vantage Infrastructure


A tag has been placed on Draft:Vantage Infrastructure, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.  Whispering ( t ) 20:09, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Conflict of Interest
Hello, Kkwiki1000. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. – Athaenara ✉  03:13, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. – Athaenara ✉  03:13, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Please note that Wikipedia is not a place to merely tell about a company. This is an encyclopedia, where article subjects must be shown with significant coverage in independent reliable sources to meet the relevant notability guidelines, in this case those written at WP:ORG(please review). Wikipedia has no interest in what a company wants to say about itself. Not every company merits an article here, even within the same field. Other similar articles existing does not automatically mean yours gets to exist too, see Other Stuff Exists. Your company may be notable based on what you say, but there must be appropriate sources about it and you shouldn't be the one to write about it. In order for you to be successful at doing so, you essentially need to forget everything you know about your company and only write based on what independent sources state. This usually means that such articles are duller than a company representative might want them to be. It is possible for COI editors to do that, but it is rare. 331dot (talk) 13:53, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

That makes sense. I am still happy to contribute in other ways, including about infrastructure investment, finance and other topics I am knowledgable about - is it possible to remove the block for edits in other areas please. Kkwiki1000 (talk) 14:35, 19 January 2019 (UTC)


 * For fairness, someone else will review your block, but since your company is in the financial industry it is going to be difficult for you to be able to directly edit in that area due to your conflict of interest. You would probably be limited to edit requests on article talk pages. 331dot (talk) 15:07, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Could this block be re-reviewed. I a. A regular contributor as a guest, and am now unable to make changes to pages while logged in. Kkwiki1000 (talk) 01:20, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I certainly hope you aren't making edits while logged out. You are not permitted to do that, and doing so may lead to an indefinite ban (not just a block) from Wikipedia. --Yamla (talk) 12:12, 6 February 2019 (UTC)