User talk:Klanackle

Welcome!

Hello, Klanackle, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! 4twenty42o (talk) 03:40, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

July 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on the page Michael Cole worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing and its related help page for more information. Thank you. 4twenty42o (talk) 03:41, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

June 2015
Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I noticed that you recently removed some content from The Bella Twins with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. &mdash; MusikAnimal  talk  14:37, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

September 2016
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Pepe the Frog, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. RunnyAmiga ※  talk 20:23, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

July 2017
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections, you may be blocked from editing. - MrX 17:36, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I notice you also ignored the big shouty notice at the top of the edit window which said in caps "DO *NOT* REMOVE ANYTHING IN THE LEAD SECTION WITHOUT FIRST GAINING CONSENSUS ON THE TALK PAGE." You may be topic banned from post-1932 American politics if you make another edit like that. Please see the discretionary sanctions alert below. Bishonen &#124; talk 17:48, 3 July 2017 (UTC).

Discretionary sanctions for pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States
Bishonen &#124; talk 17:48, 3 July 2017 (UTC).
 * Bishonen, I'm making a request. Five out of Klanackle's last seven edits were clearly POV, destructive/vandalistic edits. They don't appear to be here to edit constructively. Since some of those edits were also on articles clearly marked with DS warnings, I believe they should be blocked for a suitable length of time. They need to decide whether they will leave their conspiracy theories at home when they edit and concede that RS dictate our content, or not. -- BullRangifer (talk) 04:58, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi, BullRangifer. I agree the user has made seriously problematic edits, but they haven't edited since MrX and I warned them above. (I'm not talking about the discretionary sanctions alert, which isn't very important in the context, but the actual warnings above that.) That means this is not the right time to block. But I'm trying to keep an eye out, and I'd also appreciate it if you'd alert me to any problems I may miss. Bishonen &#124; talk 12:19, 4 July 2017 (UTC).