User talk:Klaus2001

Feedback on your article
Hello Klaus2001, Thank you for writing your article in your sandbox! I have read the article and would like to give some feedback to improve your article to Wikipedia standards and customs. While your tutor will judge it content wise, I will look if it meets the quality standards we have on Wikipedia. I standard look for a series of subjects that need improvement or are okay. I hope you can implement this feedback to your sandbox article before your final version. Thanks! Romaine (talk) 13:11, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
 * (check)Intro sentence: okay, but why is the first sentence bold? Only the subject of the article should be bold.
 * (check) Links: In an article we link to subjects usually only once. Please remove the double links. When red links appear, please fix the link or remove the link.
 * (check)Headers: Too many! You use too many sub-headers: under each header normally are minimal three paragraphs, before can be thought about a sub-header.
 * (check)References: missing! Every paragraph and every two/three sentences should have a reference. You can use a reference more than once (use the re-use tab when adding a reference). Without references an article can't be published.
 * (check)Context/timeframe: missing! In this section I expect to read about what has led to the existence of the book and the timeframe in what the book was written.
 * (no info to be found) How was the book received: insufficient to give feedback on... In this section I expect to read about how the book was received, what people thought of it, how it was used, how the perspective of the book is different from modern views, etc.
 * Ready to publish: You should have been much further in writing your article!