User talk:Klaus ib

Orphaned non-free media (Image:KIJ.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:KIJ.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:27, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Moon-pain
A tag has been placed on Moon-pain requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Woland (talk) 23:12, 11 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Musical works are not eligible for speedy deletion, so the tag has been removed. But the article still requires third-party sources. Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 04:04, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Klaus Ib Jørgensen
Hi Klaus ib. I thought that the article you wrote ought not to be deleted so quickly, given the assertion of significance. Nonetheless, are you able to add any independent third-party sources (such as newspaper or magazine articles) that would help to establish the notability of this person as per the general notability guideline? If not, there is a good chance that this article will be deleted after five days—see the discussion at Articles for deletion/Klaus Ib Jørgensen. Thanks. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 04:02, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

What you need
What you need is reviews. Are there any? If not on line, quote them. Add them to the article, and say so at the AfD. Otherwise we'll have to assume there are not any. DGG (talk) 16:36, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

A lot is added, multiple references of different nature from many publicly available sources. Art music is generally not well represented in media, unlike plastic art or literature. If this means that is can also not be represented in Wikipedia, there will contribute to a self-increasing effect in the direction of demolishing art music from public life. I believe the references are valid and neutral. I am reluctant to cite reviews in that they tend to not be (positive nor negative), but have done so upon request. Thanx. Klaus ib (talk) 06:16, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Moon-pain
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Moon-pain, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 13:12, 22 September 2008 (UTC)