User talk:Klaushougesen

Welcome!

Hello, Klaushougesen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 16:17, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Your article on yourself
While I recognize that many people find the idea of having an article about themselves on Wikipedia appealing, you would need to meet our guidelines for inclusion for the article to stay (basically, you need to have been the subject of in depth coverage by third party reliable sources). I have proposed to have the article deleted, if nothing is done, it'll be deleted in a week. If you can add that type of in depth coverage mentioned in the link above to the article, feel free to remove the proposed deletion tags. Cheers, henrik  • talk  21:38, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Klaus Lynggaard Hougesen for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Klaus Lynggaard Hougesen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Klaus Lynggaard Hougesen until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GermanJoe (talk) 22:12, 22 June 2015 (UTC)