User talk:Klazmo

January 2010
Regarding the spelling of Chang Dae-hwan: per our manual of style, we use Revised Romanization of Korean unless there's evidence that another spelling is preferred. Most of the English-language media articles seem to be using "Dae-hwan". The New York University library has his thesis filed as "Tae-hwan". Do you have any reports or other evidence supporting the spelling "Dae-whan"? If you want to change the spelling, then provide evidence, and change it in the correct places. Don't just do a search-and-replace across the whole article; then you have incorrect romanisation in the infobox and the lead reads "Chang Dae-whan, also spelled Chang Dae-whan" which is clearly incorrect. Regards, cab (call) 06:41, 31 January 2011 (UTC)