User talk:Klc17

A kitten for you!
Thanks!

Abigailwise (talk) 00:45, 22 March 2017 (UTC) 

Rose Marcario
While there is information and sources, it's simply not the notability level we consider sufficient and the sources particularly are too focused as typical business announcements and notices about the business and, since notability cannot be inherited, we would need a wider focus in additional major independent news. SwisterTwister  talk  02:01, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes it would, and citing them like the other currently formatted sources is acceptable. There's no specific limit as long as it's still significant. SwisterTwister   talk  02:15, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Better but could still benefit from all additional major independent news coverage for the best enhancement. SwisterTwister   talk  03:20, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, any of those can work as long as they're not simply trivial coverage. SwisterTwister   talk  03:34, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Simply adding any of the additional good ones may help and balance the notability weighing. SwisterTwister   talk  04:04, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rose Marcario has been accepted
 Rose Marcario, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Megalibrarygirl (talk) 21:04, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Your draft article, Draft:Camber Outdoors


Hello, Klc17. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Camber Outdoors".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 07:25, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Rachel Pohl


Hello, Klc17. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rachel Pohl".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 08:57, 27 September 2017 (UTC)