User talk:Kleenex1337

JPCT
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of JPCT, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.jpct.net. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:04, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of JPCT
A tag has been placed on JPCT requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Shadowjams (talk) 10:08, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

July 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Lightweight Java Game Library do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Christopher Connor (talk) 10:54, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Microsoft vs. MikeRoweSoft. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ben Ben (talk) 14:01, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of JPCT


The article JPCT has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * no indication of WP:notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 14:01, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive comments. The next time you make a personal attack&#32;as you did at User talk:Mike Rosoft, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Ben Ben (talk) 14:04, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Block me i can live without contributing to wikipedia
I have no link to jPCT (i neither work for them, and i don't use it anymore). I do not try to promote it, just to show that it exists, it has some capabilities and such.. All i wanted to do is to contribute to wikipedia... Some admin trusted his bot and deleted the content from wikipedia as it was supposed to be copyrighted (but the added content wasn't copyrighted.. the admin didn't bother verifying that he was about to delete UNcopyrighted info) And btw, that admin called Mike Rosoft... his name is a trademark infringement but no one cares about that? Ill never contribute again, i promess.
 * As a matter of fact, anything that meets the "threshold of originality" is copyrighted; this includes most text found on web pages. (Contrary to popular opinion, text doesn't need to have a copyright notice in order to be protected by copyright.) The copyright policy of Wikipedia states that all articles have to be released under the Creative Commons "attribution share-alike" license; unless you are the author of the text, or unless whoever owns the copyright agrees to the licensing, you are in no position to submit it to Wikipedia under the license. (The fair use exception allows for brief quotations from third-party sources when necessary in an article.) The text you have posted in the jPCT article has been lifted verbatim from the project's website, so I have deleted it in accordance with the speedy deletion criteria. Even apart from that, the article had other problems: it only linked to the project's website and didn't contain any third-party references. (The primary notability criterion is: did the article's subject attract non-trivial coverage from third-party sources?) And for the record, I am neither Polish nor Russian, I am Czech. (And for the record, using the nickname "Mike Rosoft" isn't a trademark violation; on the other hand, had I sold some soft- or hardware under it, I'd be in trouble.) - Mike Rosoft (talk) 21:36, 24 July 2010 (UTC)


 * whatever man... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.201.164.2 (talk) 12:43, 25 July 2010 (UTC)