User talk:Klen11

Gonzalo leon
A tag has been placed on Gonzalo leon, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable (see the guidelines for notability here). If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please write  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, articles #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 08:12, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

The article Gonzalo Leon has been or soon will be deleted from Wikipedia. This happened because the article seems to be about a subject but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. You might also want to read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. --NMChico24 08:24, 14 November 2006 (UTC)


 * You have recently re-created the article Gonzalo Leon, which was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not re-create the article. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a deletion review. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 08:35, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Please stop. If you continue to repost deleted material, as you did with Gonzalo leon, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --NMChico24 08:49, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Gonzalo Leon and Gonzalo leon have now been deleted three times. Please stop recreating them unilaterally and consider our notability policies. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 08:52, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Gonzalo Leon sources
You may wish to note that just recreating deleted content is generally frowned upon, especially when it is still unsourced. If you'd like to show me what sources you can draw from, perhaps I can assist you in determining whether the subject is notable, and if so, writing the article so that it will be kept? (I've moved this discussion to your talk page, orphaned article talks are often deleted.)Seraphimblade 08:54, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Can you guys see my text?
Im not sure whether im replying or just changing the article. Can you read this?

Gonzalo Leon, Technology study. Google search


 * This is your talk page. I have it on watch and will see your responses here. I advise you hold off on recreation of the deleted article, as continual recreation of deleted material is generally regarded as vandalism or disruptive. If you'd like, however, I'll go over the subject and your sources with you? Seraphimblade 09:01, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

You know, Its crazy, Its amazingly hard to add anything about someone when im not even getting paid for it.

I have read a book about Gonzalo Leon that was made by him, So i made this account in his name, KNOWING that wikipedia makes it hard for users to submit NEW and UNKNOWN things. Aparently it didnt work.

Im only doing this for Gonz cause he helped me through something incredible and amazing.

Something no OTHER psychiatrist that money can buy would be able to do.

This person is amazing, and i only want to make him much more known, by telling people to come on wikipedia and reading what i know about him.


 * While your intentions are appreciated, Wikipedia isn't for promotion of anyone or anything, simply an effort to summarize reliably-sourced knowledge. While a book written by him would generally be considered a primary source, has he been mentioned in, for example, medical journals or other such publications? Seraphimblade 09:08, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

He has been mentioned in Webhealth.net. This site was made for psychiatrists. Its pretty hard to find anything about him, other than his book, which is called "Gonzalo Leon" by himself, but that alone is hard to find.

He isnt completely famous, but very well climbing. His book, i have in hand, was given to me by him, but IS the copy of the handwritten one. His other book isnt well known yet.

He has come out on discovery health for about 2 minutes.

I cant be sure if he has come out in magazines or any publications.

Am i to wait for him to be famous for this article to start?


 * I'm unable to resolve "webhealth.net" and "www.webhealth.net", was this perhaps a different website? As to the guidelines as to what's appropriate for a biography, you may wish to read WP:BIO. Seraphimblade 09:16, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

It is mentalhelp.net
This is where he is stated, the reason he isnt like any other research is that its a new study called "Self Mental Intentions" I believe the study will be called Psychoitry mainly known in China. Search google for Psychoitry.

It has to do with placing a person in different events, and passing them through tests that even they wont realize they are going through. Its a way of helping the person performing the practice on them to realize the DEEPER truth inside, unlike psychiatrists that rely on words and answers.

Its amazing that you have gone through so much to proove that what i am trying to state isnt correct under wikipedias terms, and i cant believe someone is so dedicated to this, but this is an exception, believe me. You of all people should know that, something new, such as a new study, Has to start somewhere right? Klen11 09:29, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

I dont think this will help you... It aparently doesnt show much about psychoitry.


 * I'm rather trying to help you here, but there's only so much sarcasm-attached-to-a-barnstar I'm going to brook before giving up on that. I had a look on mentalhelp.net for the man's name, but the search came up empty. Google shows a few things, but mostly self-published. Keep in mind that Wikipedia is not a first publisher of research, but rather a source which summarizes what's already been published. Seraphimblade 09:39, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Ok, Got you. Ill find somewhere else to place this article then. With reference to wikipedia, and definetly stating this outcome. Thanks anyway :)