User talk:Klrety Man

October 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Sangza has been reverted. Your edit here to Sangza was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xgH2j54YrCE, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Va0mIeT4sno) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 06:41, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Page moves
Once you move a page, if it is contested, you cannot move it again until consensus is reached. Move Sanzi(pastry) back to Sangza and get WP:CONSENSUS on the talk page. Praxidicae (talk) 14:08, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Sanzi/Sangza
Hi - I've noticed you making a lot of edits to Sangza, including moving the article to a new title, but I haven't seen you discussing these anywhere. Changes here need to happen by consensus - if someone disagrees with a change you make, you need to go to the article talk and discuss it with them. Just reinstating the change without discussion can lead to an edit war, which can result in your account being blocked from editing. If you can't reach agreement with other editors by talking to them, you can explore dispute resolution options instead. Thanks Girth Summit  (blether)  14:20, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
Your recent editing history at Sanzi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Praxidicae (talk) 15:36, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Also, seriously please read your talk page and take all of this advice in and reflect. You may very well be right about the spelling but your inappropriate moves and dabs are bordering on serious disruption. Praxidicae (talk) 15:38, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Girth Summit  (blether) 15:39, 25 October 2020 (UTC)