User talk:Km79358n/Cyrus Kabiru

Peer Review
Hi! I just added a peer review. If you can't find it on the page, I've included it here too:

The draft does a great job telling the story of Cyrus Kabiru's early life and how it influenced his art. It covers his background, what inspired him, and how he brought innovation to his artwork.

What's Good:

It starts off really well, diving into Kabiru's childhood, the people who shaped him, and the moment that sparked his creativity. This approach makes you feel connected to his story on a personal level.

It also nicely shows Kabiru's growth from a kid fascinated by his dad's story to becoming an artist who creates eyewear from recycled stuff. It explains how he turned family stories into actual art, which is pretty cool.

What Could Be Better:

It's important for a Wikipedia article to keep a neutral tone, but sometimes the language here gets too descriptive and personal, especially in the "Early Life" part. It's good to stick to the facts and keep things neutral throughout.

While the draft talks about how Kabiru makes his art, it could dig deeper into why it's meaningful. Explaining how his art connects with big issues like consumerism, waste, and fits into the Afrofuturism movement would make it more insightful.

To make it more reliable, adding sources for the info presented is crucial. It'd be good to have citations backing up things about Kabiru's upbringing, what influenced his art, and the impact of his work.

The way the content is organized could be smoother too. Maybe condensing the childhood part and focusing more on how his art evolved and its impact could make the article flow better.

In short, the draft captures Cyrus Kabiru's artistic journey well, but it could use some tweaks in tone, more depth on the art's significance, proper citations for accuracy, and a better flow in its structure. Ab36761p (talk) 05:50, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Peer Review
I just did your peer review !

Your article is good in my opinion, I think there could be a few things added being that in the main article its mostly just about his works, while the sandbox has your lead.

Adding a few images of his work would give the reader a nice idea of what type of art her makes that you describe, as well as making the reader more immersed in what you’re saying.

I do like that you include how he started and where he’s going aswell.

Overall, you’re doing great, just make it something that you would read. If you’re not interested in what you’re saying likely others aren’t. Gabbypace (talk) 05:11, 23 November 2023 (UTC)