User talk:Kmazer

The article Vertroleum has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:17, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Vertroleum
Another editor has added the "prod" template to the article Vertroleum, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 04:45, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Vertroleum, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. E8 (talk) 01:25, 2 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Regarding additions to Wikipedia, the rules are quite clear. One editor and two admins have all seen your addition, Vertroluem, as purely spam. Thus, the article has been speedily deleted twice by different admins that viewed the article as spam; the explanation why has been clear both times. Wikipedia is not a like a forum were you are allowed to continually spam in order to increase name recognition of a brand. Regarding explanation for the deletion, according to the WP guidelines, the burden of explanation lies with the contributor, NOT the administrator. I suggest you take a thorough reading of the WP quidelines sections before contributing further. E8 (talk) 17:58, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

No one is trying to spam Wikipedia. We have coined a new term and are simply trying to define it to the public. If you are interested in the biofuel arena, then you should be happy that a major breakthrough has occured. Instead of killing the article, I'd apprecaite any help that could be giving to promote the knowledge of a truly validated crude oil replacement. Maybe I should pattern the article like Gatorade, no one seems to have a problem with it.Kmazer (talk) 13:44, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Vertroleum
I have nominated Vertroleum, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Vertroleum. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Dloh cierekim'''  13:38, 2 May 2008 (UTC)