User talk:Kmrunge/sandbox

Jonathan Swint peer review
Jcswint (talk) 00:57, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
 * The citations are well done and appear reliable
 * Best to avoid the use of "you" in the first sentence under the examples section. Try rewording the sentence
 * In the existing article, I think it would make more sense for synapomorphy to be defined before apomorphy considering the article is about synapomorphies
 * Overall the additions look appropriate and informative for the article
 * Afrotheria would be a good place to insert a link to the already existing Wikipedia page for that topic

Sutton Peer Review

 * "Molecular sequencing has probed that there is an increase in the number of thoracolumbar vertebrae."  You may want to reword this sentence. Are they looking at molecular sequencing techniques to determine the cause of the physical synapomorphy?
 * References are good and formatted correctly
 * For continuing the article, I think you have a good basis for background and the analytical methods. I would suggest adding other examples in different domains of life to fill out the content. Adding diversity in your examples will help get yot the message across to a broader audience.

Jmsutton2 (talk) 16:02, 20 November 2017 (UTC)