User talk:Kmubeen/Evaluate an Article

Article evaluation feedback
It can be really satisfying to work with articles rated high importance by WikiProjects that are interesting to us! I'm glad you were able to find one that fit this bill. Your evaluative work throughout your notes here is strong. There are a few places where a little more depth of discussion or specific examples would strengthen your observations (for example, a piece of information that isn't reliably backed up by sources). This is a pretty interesting article in that it's fairly dense with more than an average amount of text for a c-class article, but I agree that the lead section needs some work still, and I was surprised to see not very many sources for this amount of information. Nice work on this evaluation! Nicoleccc (talk) 19:09, 19 October 2019 (UTC)