User talk:Kmw096/sandbox

The article sections of Wikipedia A, C, and D make sense, the links work, and is well organized. Be sure to put quotation marks around your key terms and watch out for grammar mistakes. For example, under your first link I think "show" should be "shows" and "decide" should be "decided." Also, there should be commas before the word "but" towards the end of your article. So the main thing is grammar. Other than that it is well constructed and I like the flow of it. Good Job!

Kmr104 (talk) 15:59, 23 April 2019 (UTC)Kmr104

Cxe016 (talk) 05:23, 29 April 2019 (UTC)== Adding to KMR ==

Like KMR said everything looks great, I would just watch the spelling, for instance in wikipedia part A "cell" was inserted instead of "sell". Just minor grammar issues, I think the photos you have chosen looks great as well as the citations. Very good all the way around. Clp064 (talk) 20:44, 28 April 2019 (UTC)CLP

Personally, all of your part A, C, D, look wonderful to me, I agree with Clp064 about the minor grammar issue, but it is our drafting sandbox so mistakes ae not great but can happena and it is nice that our classmates can help us find them and guide us to better outcomes. I am not so familiarize with APA citations but yours looked wonderful and looked like APA to me and also your links were all working well which is great. Although it would be nice if the sections A, D, and C could be like in bold or underlined just so it can look more visually easier to distinguish each section and what goes with what, aside from that, I give you props for being able to add that wonderful image becuase I struggled with doing that. AWESOME JOB!Cxe016 (talk) 05:23, 29 April 2019 (UTC)