User talk:Kmzayeem/Archive2020

Changes in the article without any sources
Hey you why are you editing the proper article & why are you jealous on the Marathas empire like you removed "Maratha political victory" in Marathas invasions in Bengali & edited in such a way that the defeated & bullshit bengal subah were victorious 🤣🤣🤣 shame on you & for your kind information, Marathas did reached upto some parts of Bangladesh & who are you to interfere in our history just get lost. Hbsalvi (talk) 20:36, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I didn't find any mention of those claims in the sources and removed them as contents must be verifiable by reliable sources. Feel free to add sources for your claims and revert the changes. Also, do take a look at Wikipedia's policy of 'No personal attacks'. Continuing your boorish conduct will surely get you in trouble. --Zayeem  (talk) 11:41, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Which kind of history are you referring ? Just look into appropriate sources & then tell me. Marathas were the "De Facto" rulers of orrisa but "De Jure" of the Bengal subah by which the nawab agreed to pay tribute to Marathas (Raghuji Bhosale) in 1752 for the whole region i.e Bihar and Bengal (including today's Bangladesh) so go study first & then come here to speak. Hbsalvi (talk) 13:42, 5 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Paying tribute doesn't make it a Maratha territory. Unlike Orissa which was officially incorporated into the Maratha Empire after the death of Mir Habib, Bengal or Bihar were never occupied by the Marathas and thus, cannot be considered part of Maratha territory. In any case, as I said, add some reliable sources and feel free to change it. If you are having problems in adding a reference, follow these guidelines: Citing sources, Citation templates. Hope this helps. --Zayeem  (talk) 14:12, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Your signature
FYI, it is not permitted by WP:SIGAPP to have a signature that makes your username larger because it affects the appearance of nearby lines, especially on mobile. Please remove the code that makes your name larger than others. Best, Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) please always ping! 23:04, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
 * , thanks for pointing it out. I have changed the code. Let me know if it's alright now. --Zayeem  (talk) 15:10, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Almost. But Wikipedia's font size is 14, not 15, so yours is still 1 point bigger. should really only be used to set the size smaller in signatures per WP:SIGAPP. To prevent any errors, I'd use percentages instead, like this, so there's no chance of going over 100%. It will also allow your signature to look right in headers, or the rare talk page wrapped in a div that makes things bigger. (See below.) So, what you most likely want is, if you want 100% (default),  , otherwise font-size:90% etc. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) please always ping! 16:17, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

For comparison
= Zayeem &larr; With 100% (1) =

Zayeem &larr; With 100% (4)
= Zayeem &larr; With 14px (1) =

Zayeem &larr; With 14px (4)

 * , I have removed the font size code now. The thing is some of the fonts are illegible in their default 100% size which is why I used the code earlier. Anyways, thanks for your explanations. --Zayeem  (talk) 17:03, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you for fixing it. I know what you mean, that some fonts appear smaller at the same point size as other fonts, due to their ascent and descent. But remember, not everyone will have the font "Lucida Calligraphy" installed, such as Android users, GNU/Linux users, iOS users etc. So it means, they will see your name in the normal sans-serif typeface (which is what a browser does when it can't find a font), just slightly bigger, which will mess up surrounding lines. So, that's why it doesn't matter if the font is technically smaller, because everyone might not have it so we can't guarantee it will be smaller for everyone. Sorry. If you have any questions in future, feel free to write on my talk page. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) please always ping! 17:47, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Please note
- Sitush (talk) 12:00, 8 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Bhawaiya comes at least in part under India, whilst Bangladesh was at one time India and later a part of Pakistan. I think you need to be aware of the above for this reason. - Sitush (talk) 12:01, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * , thanks for the note. I'm aware of the discretionary sanctions. --Zayeem  (talk) 15:18, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ganges, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Faridpur ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Ganges check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Ganges?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Bangladesh Liberation War
the article vandalized by indian POV pusher folk. infobox shows indian victory with some week nationalist sources. Wikipedia is now Indopedia!!!46.114.104.86 (talk) 15:26, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Always removing appropriate sources
See listen man, Orissa was earlier a part of Bengal Subah & the Marathas invaded & occupied parts of Bengal upto hoogly river which was a much part of Bengal Subah & they too had controlled their power upto Medinipur which is also in Bengal & they even crossed the Ganges-Bhagirathi river line to raid the eastern Bengal only few times so which means that they successfully raided Bengal subah & occupied a parts of it. So you please refer proper history don't put your fingers in our matter & don't interfere in our history & look only in your matter & not others especially ours Hbsalvi (talk) 20:00, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Marathas never occupied Bengal, they never had any intention to occupy and their only objective was to raid and plunder the villages. This is all there in the sources added in the article if you had checked them. Despite your improper message at my talk page, I told you politely to add sources to back your claims. But you have continued your disruptions in multiple articles by adding unsourced contents, removing tags and in the latest incident, adding false citations as you did here. If you are having problems in understanding the guidelines/policies, communicate, use the talk pages to discuss your changes. Stubbornly continuing to restore unsourced contents will only mean that you not here to contribute but to disrupt which would only result in a block. --Zayeem  (talk) 15:07, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Well now you tell me that was orrisa & Medinipur previously a part of Bengal Subah, which the Marathas had occupied it ? Answer my questions Hbsalvi (talk) 15:12, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
 * And where did I deny that Orissa was not part of Maratha territory? --<font style="" color="#848482" face="Lucida Calligraphy">Zayeem  <font style="" color="#483C32">(talk) 15:13, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

So which means that orrisa & Medinipur were taken by Marathas from Bengal Subah isn't it ? Hbsalvi (talk) 15:51, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

& how dare you to interfere in our history & now you have crossed your limits by interfering in mahadhi shinde's history. yes he had hoisted Maratha flag on the red fort on the orders of emperor Shah Alam as mahadji had full control of delhi & ruled it so please stay away from our nation's history & do the work which is related to your nation not ours & don't give the threats of blocking I don't have any of interest in false history. So just stay away from our history. You have no right to do so. Hbsalvi (talk) 16:06, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
 * the accurate statement would be, the territory of Maratha Empire stretched up to Orissa (Or western bank of Subarnarekha River) in the east. Bengal Subah was officially part of the Mughal Empire till the British occupation. Stating Maratha territory included Bengal Subah just because a place previously part of the latter came into its control is grossly incorrect, Orissa was not even one-third of Bengal Subah.
 * And it looks like you still haven't acquainted yourself with the code of conducts of Wikipedia--<font style="" color="#848482" face="Lucida Calligraphy">Zayeem  <font style="" color="#483C32">(talk) 16:16, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Okay I got the Marathas dominated their territory upto subarnarekha river that's fine but why you edited mahadji shinde's history which is very true that yes he had hoisted Maratha flag on the red fort on the orders of emperor Shah Alam as mahadji had full control of delhi & ruled it in 1788-1803 as you can see that the Marathas fought against the British in the battle of delhi in 1803 under daulatrao shinde.so please don't change the appropriate history. Hbsalvi (talk) 17:03, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
 * for the umpteenth time, contents that are not verifiable by reliable sources have to be removed as Wikipedia doesn't support original research. Also, do get yourself familiar with the edit warring policy of Wikipedia, you have been reverting multiple editors at different articles to add unsourced content which is also a form of disruption. --<font style="" color="#848482" face="Lucida Calligraphy">Zayeem  <font style="" color="#483C32">(talk) 17:31, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Hey why are you always interfering in our history the history which is properly based on sources and you are removing it you don't have any rights to interfere in our history. Why are you jealous of our history. So please stop your Disruptive editing & stay away from our matter. Who are you ? Hbsalvi (talk) 16:56, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Replied in the user's talk page. --<font style="" color="#848482" face="Lucida Calligraphy">Zayeem  <font style="" color="#483C32">(talk) 17:19, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Listen the Bengal was a annual tributary to the Marathas until the British occupied Bengal in 1758. So just go & get your facts proper Hbsalvi (talk) 18:22, 22 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Replied in the user's talk page. --<font style="" color="#848482" face="Lucida Calligraphy">Zayeem  <font style="" color="#483C32">(talk) 15:09, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Bhitargarh
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

DS Alert
Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 17:35, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Problematic editing
You need to refrain from using dubious edit summaries,, avoid engaging in blatant source misrepresentation like you did here and also avoid using unreliable website sources when you are clearly aware of WP:HISTRS. Misrepresenting "consensus" also constitutes WP:DE. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 17:35, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Don't post on my talk page when you are supposed to reply on your talk page. Consensus was reached per Talk:Bangladesh_Liberation_War/Archive_8, with 3 editors rejecting personal views of a single editor. I would also warn you against WP:CANVASSING like you did here. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 00:22, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
 * you need to stop making false statements. It was not my personal views, I showed a source (Muldhara 71 by Moidul Hasan) that says "Bangladeshi victory" in the liberation war of Bangladesh. And there was no consensus, the page was fully protected after the edit warring and the revision with Indian victory got stuck. Za-ari-masen (talk) 09:01, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
 * You never WP:VERIFIED it. It was your personal opinion that remains unsupported by WP:RS. Indian victory was not stuck just accidentally anyway. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 10:05, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
 * , again, don't make false statements. I clearly provided a WP:RS in the discussion, pages 77, 112, and 207 of Muldhara 71, where it states Bangladesh liberation war (Bangladesher Shwadhinota Shongram) resulted in Bangladeshi victory (Bangladesher bijoy), (diffs:, ). And you are claiming a false consensus here, it's not a democracy that the opinion with numerical advantage wins the poll. Consensus is achieved when there is no more an objection to a particular suggestion in a discussion, editors sharing the same POV and edit warring to push their nationalist POV doesn't make a consensus. You need to provide a solid evidence of a consensus, like result of a dispute resolution. There is no such evidence. Za-ari-masen (talk) 10:33, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
 * That does not meet the definition of WP:VERIFY which requires you to prove how the source is supporting your information. My statement stands. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 10:40, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
 * How could this neutrally-worded message even be considered WP:CANVASSING? Did you even read the guideline before deciding to "warn" me? And the three editors you mentioned, one of them proposed to keep "Indo-Bangladeshi victory", not "Indian victory". In any case, it doesn't look like a consensus even by the slightest margin to add "India victory" in the infobox. I'm not sure if there is a competency issue or you are deliberately trying to mislead by misrepresenting the guidelines and policies. --<font style="" color="#848482" face="Lucida Calligraphy">Zayeem  <font style="" color="#483C32">(talk) 19:37, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Notice
There is a discussion about you at WP:ARE. Srijanx22 (talk) 08:18, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Bhitargarh
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Escalate
You really need to take this to WP:MILHIST. This is a seasoned WP:LAWYER you are dealing with, and a very nasty one at that. If he creates disruption at MILHIST, taake him to ANI. There are editors there he wont be able deal with his lawyering. Aditya (talk • contribs) 07:28, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes, I think WP:MILHIST hopefully will provide good input. Regarding the user, the sooner he fixes his behaviour, the better for him. --<font style="" color="#848482" face="Lucida Calligraphy">Zayeem  <font style="" color="#483C32">(talk) 21:07, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Can't generate enough interest alone. Can you state the case here? Aditya (talk • contribs) 23:14, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Are you sure you want to build the argument on mostly one book - Muldhara 71? Aditya (talk • contribs) 01:31, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
 * I haven't !voted yet and will wait to see how the discussion transforms. The reason why I discussed the book is the way they are deceitfully trying to trash something that does appear to be a valid WP:RS, in a direct attempt to push their POV. Their behaviour suggests they are not here to build a consensus but only to battle so we need to be astute in our approach to make them work towards achieving a consensus. --<font style="" color="#848482" face="Lucida Calligraphy">Zayeem  <font style="" color="#483C32">(talk) 15:08, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Wassup? Do you agree to PM67's solution? I think we have five editors already supporting it, and it has both precedence and neutrality. Aditya (talk • contribs) 03:32, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

One question
Do you know who are the most active, reputed and experienced editors in WP:BND? Aditya (talk • contribs) 02:46, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
 * As far as I know,, and  are active in content generation while  and  are active in general maintenance. I think  also edits with regular intervals. --<font style="" color="#848482" face="Lucida Calligraphy">Zayeem  <font style="" color="#483C32">(talk) 16:28, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi, how may I be of assistance? UserNumber (talk) 16:36, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Looking for active, reputed and experienced editors from WP:BND. I wish and  were more active here. Does  visits here sometimes?  Aditya (talk • contribs) 16:45, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
 * NahidSultan must be active in Bengali Wikipedia. Haven't seen Ragib for a while. --<font style="" color="#848482" face="Lucida Calligraphy">Zayeem  <font style="" color="#483C32">(talk) 17:07, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
 * ? May be UserNumber knows some more. Aditya (talk • contribs) 18:06, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
 * is pretty active and also is somewhat active.UserNumber (talk) 10:15, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , Let me know how I can help. Za-ari-masen (talk) 11:04, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
 * When the current dispute is settled on Bangladesh Liberation War, I would like to start a very serious discussion on the war. The current article fall far short of a good article. And there are academic disputes on a few areas of the war, including the number of death. I would probably need as many decent editors from many projects – Bangladesh, Pakistan, India, Military History, Cold War etc. – to participate. Let's see what eventually happens. Aditya (talk • contribs) 17:31, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi there thanks for knock me.How are you?How should I start in the heading?Should I write Infobox wikipedia users?Help me? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anni Khan (talk • contribs) 12:26, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , you already did it here perfectly, kudos! Also don't forget to sign while posting on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ) at the end of your post. --<font style="" color="#848482" face="Lucida Calligraphy">Zayeem  <font style="" color="#483C32">(talk) 16:33, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

WP:STICK
If you don't have arguments but this kind of vague hand-waves, then you should simply drop the issue and move on instead of reverting until you are blocked for WP:3RR over a lame edit war. Yoonadue (talk) 18:18, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Baro-Bhuyan
I shall provide citations. Please do not remove. Chaipau (talk) 16:00, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
 * , it was there for years without a source and it does seem factually incorrect since Baro-Bhuyan regions also included Jessore-Khulna areas which was not part of Kamarupa. I also did open a discussion at the talk page regarding the lead, you can talk about it there. I'm removing the line but feel free to reinsert when you have sources. --<font style="" color="#848482" face="Lucida Calligraphy">Zayeem  <font style="" color="#483C32">(talk) 16:05, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Please do not keep removing texts which are cited. You asked for it and got it.  Also, please do not insert "Brahmaputra valley" when it is not explicitly stated in the citations. Chaipau (talk) 15:20, 28 October 2020 (UTC)