User talk:Knavesdied

Woodblock print
Hello, will get that image of the Otto Müller woodblock print to you on wikicommons. watch this space :) - Noelypole (talk) 15:46, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I can then add it to Woodcut Knavesdied (talk)
 * I've added it to the article. The image unfortunately has reflection from the perspex covering. It also looks a bit darker than I thought, but it was the best I could do with photoshop, feel free to edit the image if you like. Noelypole (talk) 10:56, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Perhaps you don't understand how the German umlaut works. "Mueller" and "Müller" are exactly the same, and used indifferently. See here. Johnbod (talk) 09:50, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi Johnbod, I think I understand how the German umlaut works in English. It's more that the English sources for the title of this work refer to it as Portrait of Otto Müller so I've just standardised the naming of the artwork to that used in the published and verifiable sources. But if you wikilink to Otto Müller Wikipedia requires disambiguation so, to avoid the need for disambiguation, I've used the wikilink of Otto Müller. Hope that all is reasonable? Knavesdied (talk) 09:58, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Well sort of. But if Müller redirects, Mueller must too, as these are not different spellings. Personally I think the artist is primary, but I can't be bothered to do anything about it. Johnbod (talk) 10:09, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Estill Voice Training article
Yeah, that's kind of an edge case. My problems with the article are the sections "Estill Certification Programme" and especially "Influence, Adoption and Application", which sound spammy to me. Also "You can listen to Jo Estill present on this topic in a recording of Jo Estill at YouTube" isn't very encyclopedic-sounding; I'd just make that link a reference.&mdash; Chowbok  ☠  11:32, 19 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Cool. Thanks for the advice. So what's the protocol here? If I make some changes and let you know, and then you'd remove the advert template if you're happy. Or do I remove the advert template when I make my edits and you put it back on if you still feel it's still got problems? Knavesdied (talk) 12:24, 19 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Yeah, go ahead and remove it once you think it no longer applies. It can always be re-added if necessary.&mdash; Chowbok  ☠  12:55, 19 October 2010 (UTC)


 * I've reworked the "Estill Certification Programme" section and removed the "You can listen to…" wording keeping the material just in the references. Are these edits heading in the right direction? Not quite sure what to do with the "Influence, Adoption and Application" section with the list of examples. I think it's important to include referenced material on the different fields this voice training technique has been used in. Any suggestions on how I should present this? Many thanks for your help! Knavesdied (talk) 19:39, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Estill voice training logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Estill voice training logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 26 April 2021 (UTC)