User talk:Kneophyte

Hyperpower
You've removed quite a lot of information from Hyperpower, yet from what I see you haven't attempted to merge any of the information into the suggested article (Hegemony) nor have you participated in the merge discussion, nor was a consensus reached. You also provided no reason for the action. For now I will revert your edits on these pages, but if I've missed something I apologise - do let me know. Mato (talk) 20:22, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * My apologies, I didn't realize that my reasoning wasn't clear. Edit: Oh, and no consensus was reached because no discussion took place, because I am apparently the only user to have use the Discussion page since I posted the "Merge" box.
 * Hyperpower is a Neologism
 * "An editor's personal observations and research (e.g. finding blogs, books, and articles that use the term rather than are about the term) are insufficient to support articles on neologisms because this may require analysisand synthesis of primary source material to advance a position, which is explicitly prohibited by theoriginal research policy."
 * The two articles are Duplicate/Overlap.
 * "Duplicate – There are two or more pages on exactly the same subject and having the same scope."
 * "Overlap – There are two or more pages on related subjects that have a large overlap.Wikipedia is not a dictionary; there does not need to be a separate entry for every concept in the universe. For example, "Flammable" and "Non-flammable" can both be explained in an article on Flammability."
 * Hyperpower has insufficient Text.
 * "Text – If a page is very short and is unlikely to be expanded within a reasonable amount of time, it often makes sense to merge it with a page on a broader topic. For instance, parents or children of a celebrity who are otherwise unremarkable are generally covered in a section of the article on the celebrity, and can be merged there."
 * Hyperpower is, to a degree, not much more than a Definition, although that might simply be because there is so little content about it.
 * "Definitions. Although articles should begin with a good definition and description of one topic, they should provide other types of information about that topic as well. If possible, articles that contain nothing more than a definition should be expanded with additional encyclopedic content."
 * Hyperpower has become a Battleground.
 * "Wikipedia is not about winning. Disputes over content or behavior are not meant to be "won". They are meant to be resolved per consensus, with all users here for the betterment of the project at all times willing to yield to consensus."
 * — Қ ne op hy te  [Talk to me!] 21:19, 30 April 2011 (UTC)