User talk:Knewdates

August 2020
Your addition to The Tolbooth, Aberdeen has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information.   — Yours, Berrely  • Talk∕Contribs 10:40, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

September 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Livonian Brothers of the Sword—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 18:13, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Awww. Thank you so much! Your comment encourages me to improve my contributions. So kind! Knewdates (talk) 04:08, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Emmanuel Franck Biya moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Emmanuel Franck Biya, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 17:41, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi! I found extra sources and I submitted the draft. He is the most talked-about political figure in Cameroon right now, It's a bit weird that there's not a Wikipedia page of that person. Knewdates (talk) 17:15, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Societé de Presse et d'Editions du Cameroun moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Societé de Presse et d'Editions du Cameroun, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Onel 5969  TT me 03:35, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emmanuel Franck Biya (April 29)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by M-Mustapha was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Emmanuel Franck Biya and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Emmanuel Franck Biya, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Emmanuel_Franck_Biya Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:M-Mustapha&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Emmanuel_Franck_Biya reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 The Living love  talk 17:02, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

I've started a discussion about your edits and accusations on Daniel Lee (designer) on the admins noticeboard
Firstly, I do live in Berlin, secondly I am not on any social media nor do I look at social media, and thirdly I think we can both agree that an independent party needs to come in for arbitration at this point given the wealth of accusations you have levelled against me, your animosity towards me, and your nonstandard intepretations of citations. Furthermore, I don't need to have an account to edit on Wiki and I am glad wiki respects my privacy enough to allow such editing, I show my respect for this practice by signing my details each time I edit, as you can see when things get complicated I immediately go for arbitration and administrative help. I specialise on controversial topics and marginalised persons, because I am careful, an ally, and I know how to vet citations for controversial topics, especially when they have to do with the city I live in. talonx78.55.186.185 (talk) 08:28, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Talk:Daniel_Lee_(designer)
Please be mindful of harassment via WP:OUTING, in particular Dredging up their off-site opinions to repeatedly challenge their edits can be a form of harassment. Whether or not that material belongs in the article can be discussed without attempts at identifying the IP off-wiki, which can be viewed as a form of intimidation. OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:14, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
 * You are right, I am terribly sorry about that, I am going to fix this and apologize to this person right away. Knewdates (talk) 16:58, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
 * someone is once again manipulating both botega veneta and daniel lee pages on wiki. this time the deleted contextualising information regarding the pandemic lockdown during which private parties were not alowed and that staff-confirmed gatherings at soho were 100% confirmed to have taken place.. talonx77.13.166.64 (talk) 18:54, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Rina Dhaka for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rina Dhaka is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rina Dhaka until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GermanKity (talk) 10:09, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Unsourced Claims on Rina Dhaka
Hey, just a heads up that I removed the unsourced claims that Rina Dhaka's looks have been "showcased by celebrities such as Lara Dutta, Naomi Campbell and Uma Thurman." If you want to reinstate that claim, it's fine by me. Just make sure there's a valid reference to accompany it.

Thanks,  RFZYN SPY  talk 09:15, 13 July 2021 (UTC)


 * The claim is sourced. I didn't add the source in the lead, as its a resume of the article, but it's in the article. Knewdates (talk) 09:42, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Trussardi
Hello Knewdates, I noticed that you have recently edited the article about Trussardi. A week ago I proposed an edit in the talk page (here). I have not, however, received any feedback since then. It would mean a lot to me to have your take on what I have submitted there. Would you have a look and let me know what you think? :) Stephanie Epiro (talk) 14:42, 13 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi, @Stephanie Epiro! I have checked your comments on the talk page of Trussardi. Well, if an article isn't very popular or controversial, there will not be so much discussion on the talk page. I think that the changes that you're proposing improve the article. So, go ahead! Knewdates (talk) 20:03, 14 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks a lot for your help :) Stephanie Epiro (talk) 15:38, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Ashima-Leena moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Ashima-Leena, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheChronium 09:11, 15 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi, @TheChronium. All the info in the article is backed with sources and anyone that uses Google News can find a lot of info about the brand. Are not reliable media of the largest English-speaking country? I consider that the decision is based on a biased and Western-centric perspective. I spent considerable time planning that entry and I don't pretend to spend more, this is not my job. I think that Wikipedia loses in diversity with this kind of short-minded criteria. Knewdates (talk) 22:11, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Societé de Presse et d'Editions du Cameroun
Hello, Knewdates. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Societé de Presse et d'Editions du Cameroun, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:02, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Emmanuel Franck Biya
Hello, Knewdates. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Emmanuel Franck Biya, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Emmanuel Franck Biya


Hello, Knewdates. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Emmanuel Franck Biya".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:37, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Ashima-Leena
Hello, Knewdates. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ashima-Leena, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)