User talk:Knight of BAAWA/Archive1

Atheism
Hi! I don't generally edit this article accept for vandal watch and the like. Noticed the edit you reverted was riddled with links to an opinion website. Don't want to disturb your call since you regarded it as a good-faith edit, but if it happens again you might want to leave a   template warning or similar (See WP:WARN for a list of standard warning templates) on the user's talk page. If nobody warns, adminstrators can't block when the behavior repeats. Best, --Shirahadasha 22:31, 2 December 2007 (UTC)


 * I will certainly take that under advisement for the next time. Knight of BAAWA 23:29, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

May 2008
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: You may already know about them, but you might find Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit was inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Oore (talk) 22:16, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Hate campaing
Hi partner! Well do you know what's happening? when the ancap haters will stop their campaing, is very sad, because their damage also their own credibility. Regards! --Nihilo 01 (talk) 05:26, 8 November 2009 (UTC)


 * They will never stop. They have such an emotionally-ingrained hate of letting people make their own decisions that it galls them to think that others won't do their bidding. - Knight of BAAWA (talk) 19:26, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Greetings
I do not believe our paths have crossed previously, but it is obvious we edit some of the same articles. As that is the case, I ask you: What are we going to do about this John Bessa character? ---  RepublicanJacobite  The'FortyFive' 03:30, 11 May 2010 (UTC)


 * I've already informed him that he violated wikipolicy by using a talk page as a rant page. Should he continue I'm thinking about a stronger warning, and then if it continues after that to simply report him. His rants indicate that he's unwilling to have some mediation. - Knight of BAAWA (talk) 03:54, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I see no basis for mediation. "The article doesn't say what I want it to" and "People won't let me rant on the talk page" are not valid arguments to take to an administrator or mediator.  I am not concerned, to be honest.  If he continues on his current course, he will end up blocked.  Cheers! ---  RepublicanJacobite  The'FortyFive'  16:11, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

I just thought that I would mention that he is back, and back to his old tricks. Vigilance, comrade! ---  RepublicanJacobite  The'FortyFive' 23:09, 22 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Yes, I've been checking every couple days to see if he's come back. He's just not learning that this isn't MyFaceSpaceBook. - Knight of BAAWA (talk) 14:32, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Ha ha ha!! That is a great way to put it.  He does not seem to be interested in making useful contributions.  Mostly what he does is pursue his vendettas.  If he would be more cooperative, and not have such a combative attitude, he'd have a much easier time.  Oh well. ---  RepublicanJacobite  The'FortyFive'  15:44, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Interesting. I just took a look at his edit count, and 85.18% of his edits are to talk pages.  He's here to talk, according to the evidence, not to contribute to articles. ---  RepublicanJacobite  The'FortyFive'  17:12, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Wikiquette alert
Hello,. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikiquette alerts regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ---  RepublicanJacobite  The'FortyFive' 17:54, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
 * This matter has now been dealt with. Cheers! ---  RepublicanJacobite  The'FortyFive'  17:28, 25 May 2010 (UTC)