User talk:Knightserbia

-

File permission problem with File:Piet_m_comp2Belgrade.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Piet_m_comp2Belgrade.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 17:23, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Marie_LaurencinBelgrade.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Marie_LaurencinBelgrade.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 17:25, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Serbia
Pozdrav! -- WhiteWriter speaks 21:08, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

National museum
Hello, Knight. Can you, please tell me what is your source for article National Museum of Serbia‎‎? Anyway, thanks for your great expansion. -- WhiteWriter speaks 11:45, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank u ,for your curiosity.They r numerous,from books issued by Museum itself,to web-based sources.I can't put source behind every painting..Anyway I will put more sources on National Museum of Serbia.
 * Bravo! If you need any help, talk to me! I will help. Možemo pisati i na srpskom, pa ću prevesti. A potpisuješ se na stranama za razgovor tako što napišeš četiri tilde, jedna pored druge. Ovako ~, i wikipedija te automatski potpiše! Probaj! All best! -- WhiteWriter speaks 13:27, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

E,super,naravno<>Knightserbia (talk) 13:34, 27 September 2011 (UTC) ,

License tagging for File:News-2010-may-radislav krstic 590628385.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:News-2010-may-radislav krstic 590628385.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:05, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:RouenCathedralSerbia05.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:RouenCathedralSerbia05.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:05, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Which museum???
I have moved List of Dutch and Flemish graphics and engravings in the museum to User:Knightserbia/sandbox. Did it occur to you that it might be an idea to include the name of the museum in the title? &mdash; RHaworth 19:45, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dutch and Flemish graphics and engravings in the National Museum of Serbia


The article Dutch and Flemish graphics and engravings in the National Museum of Serbia has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No evidence that the Serbian museum's Dutch art collection is notable

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい ) 00:46, 29 September 2011 (UTC) Sory,sources are in Serbian,I will leave in it,So you can use google translate,if you don't mind.And on official Museum site you can also find information in English.So ,I will leave numerous sources.Satisfied? KnightserbiaKnightserbia (talk) 00:53, 29 September 2011 (UTC) U got evidences. KnightserbiaKnightserbia (talk) 05:08 17 December 2011 (UTC)

KnightS
Pozdrav! Radiš lepu stvar, i radiš to dobro, i jako te podržavam! :) Samo da ti pomognem u par stvari. Evo, na primeru:


 * Ovo ovde je moja revizija u kojoj sam:


 * 1) . Dodao bold naslov. Skoro uvek članci na wikipediji kao prvu reč imaju naziv članka, pa sam to odradio, već po tradiciji.
 * 2) . Tvoje odlične reference stavio u šablon kako se reference pišu na wikipediji, i malo ih opisao, da ne bude samo link:
 * Pogledaj WP:REFSTART, da bi lepo video kako se pišu reference, a u osnovi se koriste jednostavne oznake:


 * I još samo pri dnu stranice


 * ==References==


 * Gde će se reference pojavljivati, dok u tekstu ostaju samo brojevi.


 * 1) . == See also == sekcija, gde se stave članci koji imaju najviše veze sa člankom na kom se nalazimo. Ovde su to ova dva, ali mogu biti i drugačiji, i slično...
 * 2) . I na kraju, kategorije. One služe pre svega da članak bude negde kategorisan, i da se zna kojoj tematici pripada uopšteno.

Eto, to je to! Ako imaš bilo kakvo pitanje, javi se, piši na mojoj strani za razgovor, i ja ću ti pomoći kako i koliko znam i umem. Srećan sam što neko želi da piše nešto što na najlepši načim predstavlja Srbiju. U to ime, dajem ti nagradu koja se deli na wikipediji, Barnstar. Možeš je staviti na svoju korisničku stranicu, ili slično! Samo napred, i kulturno sa svima! :) -- WhiteWriter speaks 17:07, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

P.S. I još jedna stvar, nevezano za ovo. NIKADA, ni po koju cenu, nemoj da revertuješ više od tri puta dnevno. Nikako, nikada. Čim imaš neki problem, odmah piši na strani za razgovor, ili se obrati meni da ti pomognem. :) Pozdrav. -- WhiteWriter speaks 17:22, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Translation using Google Translate
Hello! Doing a nice thing, and doing it well, and really supported you! :) Just to help you in a couple of things. Here, for example:


 * This here is my review where I:


 * 1) . Added bold headline. Almost always articles on Wikipedia as the first word of a title of the article, so I did, but by tradition.
 * 2) . Your excellent references placed in the template to write a reference at wikipedia:
 * See WP: REFSTART, it would be nice to see how to write references, and basically use simple phrases:


 * And just at the bottom of the page


 * ==References==


 * Where will the references to appear, while the text will remain just numbers.


 * 1) . == See also == section, where you put the articles that have the most to do with the article where we are. Here are the two, but they may be different, and so on ...
 * 2) . Finally, the categories. They serve primarily to be somewhere in the article ranked and to know which belongs to the general subject matter.

Well, that's it! If you have any questions, come in, write to my talk page, and I will help as well as I know I can. I am happy that someone wants to write something that is in the best načim Serbia. In that respect, I give the prize to be shared at wikipedia, Barnstar. You put on your user page or something! Go ahead, and culturally with everyone! -- WhiteWriter speaks 17:07, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:ArmstrongCollinsAldrinBelgrade1969.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:ArmstrongCollinsAldrinBelgrade1969.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:06, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In Belgrade, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Michael Collins (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Massacre in Dobrovoljacka
Hello,, and thank you for your contributions!

Some text in an article that you worked on Massacre in Dobrovoljacka, appears to be directly copied from another Wikipedia article, Sarajevo column case. Please take a minute to double-check that you've properly attributed the source text in your edit summary.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Massacre in Dobrovoljacka at any time. CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:59, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Photo Ustaše
I agree with you the photo is disputed, it has wrong discription. It's Domobran, not Ustaše officer. I had discussion abt the photo, you can see a talk page, but it was pointless. If you enter discussion abt the photo, you will have my support.

Cheers.

--Wusten fuchs 19:17, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Sovereign Military Order of Malta
Hello there, I'm writing to let you know that I've just deleted a sentence from this article, which the revision history tells me was added by you two days ago. The text ran as follows: "Also it is very uncommon that Order reccognized independence of Muslim majority state of Kosovo,where Christians has no basic human and religious rights." I wanted to let you know that I deleted it because I could not understand what the text meant, and also because the second part of the sentence would seem to be a highly contentious claim, which at the very least would require a source and would probably still be a violation of WP:NPOV. In addition, the Kosovo article contains sourced material that seems to contradict the statement directly, since it concerns people in Kosovo converting to Christianity, which would seem unlikely in the event Christians were being persecuted there. I'm telling you this because I didn't want you to think I had come along and deleted your contribution wantonly, and to give you the opportunity to go back and re-phrase the sentence so that it makes sense and is neutral and sourced, if you'd like to do that. Good day! Lordrosemount (talk) 23:32, 10 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your kind message! I understand what you meant now (the fact that the SMOM recognised Kosovo is strange for the reasons you suggested), and I think you're right to leave it deleted, because it seems to be more a matter of opinion than fact. The truth is I don't really know very much at all about Kosovo, Serbia or the SMOM, but I can appreciate that it's a very difficult subject for someone in your country, and it shows maturity to realise that something you've put in was maybe a little hot-headed, and not to take offence at someone removing it. Incidentally, I think I might do a bit of copyediting on a couple of your articles (I was thinking particularly of the National Museum article), just to make the text a little clearer. Please don't mind, or think I'm stalking you, it's just that visiting your page showed me what looks like an opportunity to make a useful contribution. Thanks again! Lordrosemount (talk) 14:09, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Krater 5th century AD.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Krater 5th century AD.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:45, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Frano Kršinić (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Croatian and Yugoslav


 * Antun Augustinčić (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Yugoslav

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:32, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Medieval Serbian army (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Catalans, Bows, Macedonia, Spears, Andronikos III and Aragonese

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Monica Seles, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Serbian and Yugoslav (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Recent edits to Croatian Spring and Croatian Defence Forces
Your recent edits to the subject articles were marked as "minor" and did not include edit summaries. Per WP:ES, it is considered good practice to provide a summary for every edit, especially when reverting (undoing) the actions of other editors or deleting existing text; otherwise, people may question your motives for the edit. Accurate summaries help other contributors decide whether it is worthwhile for them to review an edit, and to understand the change should they choose to review it. When a major edit (e.g. deletion of a substantial amount of text, a significant addition, or a substantial rewrite) doesn't have an edit summary, there are fewer reasons to assume good faith and busy editors may be more inclined to revert the change without checking it in detail. Summaries are less important for minor changes (which means generally unchallengeable changes such as spelling or grammar corrections), but a brief note like "fixed spelling" is helpful even then. I note from your edit history that you usually mark your edit as "minor" regardless of the content. It is clear your edits to both of the above articles were not "minor" and they also indicate that you may be pushing a particular point of view. I consider the editing approach you appear to be taking is disruptive, and would like to point out that all articles relating to the Balkans are subject to discretionary sanctions under ARBMAC, which could result in editors being blocked or even banned from WP. Please use edit summaries in future, and only tick the "minor" box when the edit is generally unchallengeable, such as spelling or grammar corrections. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (send... over) 06:41, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Martin Špegelj, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page JNA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:22, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Note
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Zaharije Ostojić does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks!Peacemaker67 (send... over) 06:29, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

June 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=560266405 your edit] to Juan de Flandes may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:25, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
 * de Flandes Belgrade.jpg|Saint John the Baptist Sermon (1497) ; National Museum of Serbia part of polyptych

Your recent edit of the Siege of Dubrovnik
Hello. Your recent edit of the Siege of Dubrovnik appeared to be disruptive because you added material to the infobox which is not supported by the referenced prose of the article. Furthermore, your edit was left with no edit summary contrary to the recent instruction regarding need for edit summaries left at your talk page by Peacemaker. Just like back then, it is hard to assume good faith in cases of such edits, especially since the non-summarized edits are used as a way to disrupt a peer-reviewed article. I also consider the editing approach you appear to be taking to be disruptive, and would also like to point out that all articles relating to the Balkans are subject to discretionary sanctions under ARBMAC. Regards.--Tomobe03 (talk) 09:18, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Answer
Hello,changed articles also didn't have any sources.Whole article is based on personal interpretations,which is undoubt false.Also you can't report me,because you don't have an evidence for your false claims.I know you wish,but... Btw only thing you fixed is about Croatian victory,which is without any source.Also another things I fixed stayed in same order. Regards

Disambiguation link notification for July 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Belgrade, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IT (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Smederevo Fortress, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Serbian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=570640867 your edit] to CBA (food retail) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:58, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

October 2013
Please, do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to IMRO. If you continue to edit pages by deliberately introducing biased and unsourced information, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits appear to be nonconstructive and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again and provide neutral academic sources. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 07:38, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Answer
Lol,Go ahead,..?. You are funny,so any discusion with you is wasting of time. Learn more about your origin. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bulgars Don't treat to anybody on wikipedia.Work it good manner and put citations.Thanks. Knightserbia (talk) 07:50, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Please, keep in mind that in a 2007 arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any user editing Balkans-related articles in a disruptive way. If you engage in further inappropriate behaviour in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article/topic ban. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 10:40, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

So,you want be reported ,right? Stop trolling my talk page without any reason. Knightserbia (talk) 07:50, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Serbian Air Force and Air Defence, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SA-18 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:New Belgrade at night view from hill.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:New Belgrade at night view from hill.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:06, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Chetniks
I noticed you have edited the article, Chetniks. After removing references and referenced information three times, user:User:2A00:C440:20:27E:248A:3A23:609F:A121 has initiated a discussion concerning the fictional and bias, of Sabrina Ramet's book, The Three Yugoslavias: State-Building and Legitimation, 1918–2005. I thought you might be interested in this issue. Thanks. --Kansas Bear (talk) 21:15, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Van Dyck Belgrade.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Van Dyck Belgrade.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:45, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

March 2014
Hello, I'm Jingiby. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because they did not appear constructive. Do not add a new content without giving a valid reason for the that in the edit summary. Also provide reliable sources by editing articles. Forums can not be used as sources on Wikipedia. Genetic studies point at lower level of I2a among Serbs ca. 30%. Check for example: ''Gene. 2012 Jan 31. High levels of Paleolithic Y-chromosome lineages characterize Serbia. Regueiro M, Rivera L, Damnjanovic T, Lukovic L, Milasin J, Herrera RJ.'' If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 19:10, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

You are right.IGENEA is the most serious company regarding genetics,but it is weird that they published results on their internal forum.I didn't realize that when I put sources.My bad.Thanks Knightserbia (talk) 05:43, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jat Airways, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caravelle. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Air Serbia – issue
Hi Knightserbia, I was recently caught in the discussion about Air Serbia - Jat Airways relations. Please, if you are willing so, read my whole expose about this issue here:, and give your opinion on it, so we can move forward from this stalemate. Thanks! -- AirWolf  talk  15:14, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Update: The whole merge discussion was directly moved here: . Thanks.-- AirWolf  talk  21:23, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

August 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=622561649 your edit] to Battle of Kosovo may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:35, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
 * made for the attack. After positioning in a V-shaped formation, {{cite book|author=Slavomir Nastasijevic|title=Vitezi Kneza Lazara|url=http://books.google.com/
 * 11 September 2013|year=1990|publisher=Zmaj|page=38|quote=Код Мињанелиjа, кнез је претходно заробл {{red|&#62;}} ен и принуЬен да Мурату положи заклетву верности! и тада је један од њих, кажу да је то био Лазар,

August 2014
I happened to notice these edits. This is tendentious and I have reverted it because: I see you were notified of WP:ARBMAC on at least three occasions now, yet you have continued to make these bizarre and tendentious claims. Please be much more careful in the future, or avoid editing in this topic area. Thanks. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 09:47, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Before WWI, the city was part of the Austrian Kingdom of Dalmatia, but in the war Italy took control, which was reversed within a few years; to refer to that period as "occupied by Italy" is hardly improper.
 * During WWII, the claim that "Nazi Germany couldn't [have] occupied their Croatian allies" is wrong, because the NDH existed because of German occupation of Yugoslavia, not the other way around
 * During the Yugoslav Wars, the claims that "Federal army or Serbian rebels, never intended to conquer the town" is false because per sourced claims at Battle of Šibenik, they literally had the intention of taking control of the barracks, which is located in the south of the city - taking the barracks from the direction of the northeast, without taking the town, would have been a strange endeavor to say the least.
 * Replacing a tourist guide citation in the history section is fine, but unless the claim is actually false, there's a tag for that, better source needed

File permission problem with File:Dance around Golden Calf-Belgrade.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Dance around Golden Calf-Belgrade.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 12:01, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Madonna-and-child-giotto.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Madonna-and-child-giotto.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Kelly hi! 07:58, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Special Air Service, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KLA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

May 2015
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Air Serbia, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer $Talk$ 23:25, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

I will change the content cause I was right. One more plane is added to the fleet. I will put source next time, but I don't see sources on every info on other companies. Thanks.
 * Right or wrong does not work here. You should provide sources for your changes. Read WP:VERIFY, a basic policy. The lack of sources in other articles is not an entitlement for you to violate a policy. I've reverted your change.--Jetstreamer $Talk$ 20:54, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Belgrade Waterfront, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St. Regis. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

December 2015
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Special Anti-Terrorist Unit (Serbia), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. ''Caution for POV removal of sourced content. The source clearly states that there was a large number of children among the victims.'' Thomas.W talk 18:38, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Equipment of the Serbian Army. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Neither of the references for Lazar 2 supports the claim that 200 vehicles have been ordered, in fact they don't mention any order at all, and the rest of the material you re-added has no reference at all. Thomas.W talk 21:56, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Get of my page and Serbian related pages. Thanks.(Knightserbia (talk) 05:58, 16 December 2015 (UTC))

January 2016
Nisam primetio na vreme da je moja revizija na temi o naoruzanju i opremi vojske Srbije sa nekompletnim linkom vezanim za intervju sa generalom Dikovicem, pa zato evo ovde postavljam ti taj link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJ7F7NK9iuk. Pogledaj od 7:50, i prestani da editujes tu stranicu pogresnim podacima. To sto je nesto primljeno u naoruzanje u oruznaim snagama neke druge drzave, apsolutno je nebitno iz ugla VS. Sve sto se prima u naoruzanje VS, prvo mora da prodje ispitivanja u TOC-u. Ista je procedura i za sredstva iz domaceg razvoja i za opremu koja se kupuje sa strane. Primera radi sva moderna oprema u SB je prosla ispitivanja u TOC-u, iako je vecina iste u upotrebi u destinama oruzanih snaga sirom sveta. Znaci Nora tek ulazi u TOC, i na osnovu nekih prethodnih iskustava, ne treba oecekivati proizvodnju za potrebe VS pre 2017 godine. Proka89 (talk) 20:16, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Muslim forces terror in Sarajevo


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Muslim forces terror in Sarajevo. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Bosnian War. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Bosnian War – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Xender Lourdes (talk) 16:21, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Muslim forces terror in Sarajevo listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Muslim forces terror in Sarajevo. Since you had some involvement with the Muslim forces terror in Sarajevo redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Xender Lourdes (talk) 02:22, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:ChagallBelgrade.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:ChagallBelgrade.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 11:19, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Belgrade IT sector


The article Belgrade IT sector has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * WP:NOTESSAY surely - this sounds very much like someone's opinion of the IT sector in Belgrade

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gbawden (talk) 11:04, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Serbian Air Force and Air Defence
 PLEASE STOP  changing or removing reliably sourced, content as you have done on  the Serbian Air Force and Air Defence article. Further reverting the table to include pictures goes against policy per: WP:WHENTABLE and WP:IMAGEMOS - Thank You FOX 52 (talk) 17:46, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Don't imaginig things. You are throlling. There were no reliable sources you provide.(Knightserbia (talk) 20:13, 9 March 2017 (UTC))

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Sava Center Congress Hall.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Sava Center Congress Hall.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Majora (talk) 00:49, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited SS-N-3 Shaddock, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vis. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Serbian Air Force and Air Defence. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. ''With this edit you restored a section title "History of Freedom". This section title is propaganda and I had removed it before. Do not restore again. '' Dr.   K.  16:41, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Проблем
Serbian Air Force and Air Defence Одређене особе уредници,првенствено мислим на корисника "Ivanvector" су уклонили слике из странице "Serbian Air Force and Air Defence" и не дозвољавају да се врате слике,а сваки ваздухоплов и против-ваздушни систем има своју слику у Ратном Ваздухопловсту Србије,да ли можете помоћи око тога да се врате слике где су биле скоро па цео временски период од креирања странице.Такође сматрам да ти корисници који су уклањали нису комепетентни да уништавају страницу.Молио бих ако може да се све врати на старо и да се дода заштита. Изгледало је овако: http://prntscr.com/fk4qhq. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Evandro321 (talk • contribs) 15:03, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * This is the English language Wikipedia, where English should be used also on talk pages, especially when making comments about what other named editors have or haven't done. It also doesn't matter if there are pictures in the article on the Serbian Wikipedia, since each language version of Wikipedia is separate, and has it's own rules. - Tom &#124; Thomas.W talk 15:12, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

EuroBasket 2017 roster templates
Please stop changing clubs of players to current teams, because per consensus we list the last season's (2016–17) teams. – Sabbatino (talk) 10:54, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Who's consensus? Why I need to know that?

Luka Modrić
Serbian or any tabloids, including Daily Mail, are not WP:RS nor the information can be verified and relevant for the inclusion. As the intention of such article is already propaganda, it's citing is disruptive. This is a warning.--Miki Filigranski (talk) 08:24, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nordeus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBD ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Nordeus check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Nordeus?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:18, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Hilton Belgrade for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hilton Belgrade is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Hilton Belgrade until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Andrew Base (talk) 05:30, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

December 2019
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Srebrenica, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  13:37, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

I don't know who work for, but your 'vandalism fight', when editors give reliable resources is kind of very suspicious. You treat to editors in very rude manners. Tell your boss, that justice will win one day.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Air Serbia. Jetstreamer $Talk$ 11:46, 23 December 2019 (UTC) I really worry about resources in Argentina, but, you know I was right. Morava Airport is Focus city for Air Serbia.
 * WP:PROVEIT.--Jetstreamer $Talk$ 12:11, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Nickolas reigner's David with Goliath Head.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Nickolas reigner's David with Goliath Head.jpg, which you've attributed to Nickolas Reigner. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:03, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Cleve Joos van-Man with the Rosary normal.jpg


The file File:Cleve Joos van-Man with the Rosary normal.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Superseded by File:Joos van Cleve - Man with the Rosary - WGA05045.jpg."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. mattbr 07:43, 29 August 2022 (UTC)