User talk:Knispel

Please stop vandalising pages because you are a Michael Wittmann fanboy that cannot stand any critism made of him.--EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 14:16, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Walter Model
Please read the talk page Talk:Walter_Model Hohum (talk) 14:02, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

November 2011
Your recent editing history at Erich von Manstein shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. Binksternet (talk) 07:22, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Erich von Manstein. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ''Please do not continue edit warring and making statements like "I will be relentless in deleting the stuff." These will lead to you getting blocked for edit warring, if not 3RR. I'm watching your edits; kindly desist right now and continue your discussions on the talk page of the article concerned in a civil manner.''  Wifione  Message 09:02, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

A complaint about your edits has been filed at the 3RR noticeboard
Please see WP:AN3. It is possible that you may be blocked unless you promise to stop edit warring. You can respond to the complaint if you wish. EdJohnston (talk) 17:11, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 08:53, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 09:52, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

Caution regarding Erich von Manstein
You have removed sourced content from this article repeatedly in the last few days. If you continue to remove information critical of the article subject as you did here, on 30 November without first getting a consensus of editors on the talk page to support your change, you may be blocked for edit warring. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 17:45, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at Erich von Manstein. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

After my above warning you have continued to remove material cited to Smelser and Davies. You are not the sole judge of which published sources are to be used in this article. That depends on consensus, which you never received. Nobody else agrees with your verdict on Smelser and Davies. Any historical figure is bound to look better if all criticism of their record is removed. That is not the way to construct an objective encyclopedia: EdJohnston (talk) 15:56, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Blocked again
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Disruptive editing. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. After expiry of your previous block, you immediately returned to the article to remove a properly-sourced statement that von Manstein had forged some documents regarding his war record. This shows no regard for consensus and indicates you plan to continue pushing your point of view. In my opinion you should remain indefinitely blocked until you express willingness to follow Wikipedia policy. An agreement not to edit any articles related to World War II would be a reasonable offer from you. EdJohnston (talk) 17:07, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

You fail to type in proper sentences or use proper sentence and spacing structure, including proper capitalization, and you manage to misspell every other word. However, you change to a misspelling of "authoritative" here. What is going on here? –MuZemike 08:48, 4 December 2011 (UTC)