User talk:Knn0059/Diverticular disease/Waynengo Peer Review

Peer review by Wayne Ngo

Lead: The lead is updated and comprehensive of content in the body and written concisely.

Relevance: The content added is relevant to the topic and is up to date with recently published sources.

Tone: Tone is informative and does not appear biased. There appears to be no over-represented view point.

Sources and References Adequate citations for statements and citations links are working. There are 4 review articles cited which is good!

Grammar: Some grammar and streamlining can be done to increase readability. But overall, well written and organized. For example, some sentences are separated into new paragraphs but can be combined into 1 paragraph.

Pictures: Great info box. Only recommendation is to maybe add a picture/diagram/cartoon illustrating the difference between the 3. Although this might be difficult because of copyright etc.

Notability: Topic is notable and sources are adequate and contain secondary and tertiary sources.

Overall suggestions for improvements: - Grammar and streamlining sentences - Adding an illustration to show the difference between the 3 - Or can add endoscopic pictures for each - Overall, content feels complete and well sourced