User talk:Knope7/Archives/2017/January

Reference errors on 11 January
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
 * On the D'Arcy Carden page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=759449422 your edit] caused a broken reference name (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F759449422%7CD'Arcy Carden%5D%5D Ask for help])

Consistency.
Note that the nominees are shown in the infoboxes of the other current cabinet officers. GoodDay (talk) 01:52, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * for consistency, I think the argument is stronger that the nominees should not be listed on current cabinet officers articles. There might be a different argument for the office they are being nominated too, such as Secretary of Health and Human Services, but I don't think it's appropriate for the articles on current Secretaries, such as Sylvia Mathews Burwell. First, it is a virtual certainty that Trump will succeed Obama but there has been a decision not to add Trump to Obama's infobox until the transition takes place. Second, with cabinet officials there is also a possibility that even if the nominee is confirmed the timing will give rise to an official assuming the positioning the interim, either because there is a delay in the incoming Secretary assuming the office or even the possibility of the current Secretary resigning. Third, as I said, consistency can cut both ways. We can consistently remove the nominees from all individual cabinet member pages until the replacement actually takes over. Knope7 (talk) 02:21, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Just pointing out, the nominees were added to the others & that's why i added to those two. I won't oppose, if all are hidden. GoodDay (talk) 02:24, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I have only hidden or removed nominees on the pages I have actively been editing. Certainly I would not oppose hiding it for all nominees. Knope7 (talk) 02:28, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sally Jewell
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sally Jewell you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of JerrySa1 -- JerrySa1 (talk) 00:41, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sally Jewell
The article Sally Jewell you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sally Jewell for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of JerrySa1 -- JerrySa1 (talk) 03:21, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Catherine McCabe) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Catherine McCabe, Knope7!

Wikipedia editor Insertcleverphrasehere just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"needs more info, but ok as a stub for now"

To reply, leave a comment on Insertcleverphrasehere's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

InsertCleverPhraseHere  19:06, 21 January 2017 (UTC)