User talk:Knotrice

Thank you to removes
Dear Knotrice.I think,That the article summarize and add more information.Good Appropriate decision.Thank you. --基 建吉(MOTOI Kenkichi) (talk) 21:06, 11 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Dear Knotrice.I thought. What sentence can ask all of my writing calibration? Your English is so we can come it'd great. Let's make together good post and perfect the Article! see that.God bless you! --基 建吉(MOTOI Kenkichi) (talk) 16:54, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

I guess you mean for me to make those two parts of the article more legible. Tell me if any of this is misinterpreted: to Did I misunderstand you here, at any point? Knotrice (talk) 02:52, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
 * "The Art motif on use to Nico_Nico_Douga (ニコニコ動画?)　are the Art base images more to more.For movement on japanese subculture　to Often.Japanese media use That film too."
 * "The video sharing website Nico Nico Douga heavily utilises Shift_JIS artwork, the best example of which is seen in their logo. It is believed that this has been done to make themselves a part of pop culture."

I see and Certainly. I seems to lack relevance of the article. So very important and fundamental mistake. Thank you pointed out. The article will help you create a polite sentences. God bless Knotrice.--基 建吉(MOTOI Kenkichi) (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 17:23, 17 July 2010 (UTC).

WWIII
I moved your comment to Talk:WWIII, where it belongs, so that anybody can discuss it, not just you and me. See my reply there. MrMoustacheMM (talk) 07:41, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, except, had I posted it on Talk:WWIII_(album), chances are you wouldn't have seen it - unless you were watching that talk page in particular. Knotrice (talk) 08:10, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
 * If you watch an article, then the talk page is automatically watched along with that article! Makes it handy for just such a reason as this. Thanks for the reply there. MrMoustacheMM (talk) 17:06, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Three years later
It only took someone (me) three years to see your concerns on Elaine Benes talk page and respond to it. : ) Chagallophile (talk) 15:43, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Oh wow, I'd forgotten I'd even written that. Thanks for making the change, though! :) Knotrice (talk) 23:29, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Baudouin Oosterlynck
Hello Knotrice,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Baudouin Oosterlynck for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Daniel kenneth (talk) 17:33, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Baudouin Oosterlynck
Hello, Knotrice. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Baudouin Oosterlynck, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Daniel kenneth (talk) 17:34, 5 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your note on my user talk page. I did add a couple of sources and I removed the prod notice, but the page is still quite brief, and if there are other reliable sources that provide more information about Oosterlynck, in French, Flemish, English, or otherwise, by all means you should add them to the page.  Best, --Arxiloxos (talk) 15:54, 6 May 2016 (UTC)