User talk:Knotslanding/Archive 2

Fair use rationale for Image:Monorail_fire_1985.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Monorail_fire_1985.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Melesse (talk) 10:29, 15 September 2008 (UTC)


 * What does Wikipedia have against the use of newspaper articles and images? Knotslanding (talk) 10:32, 15 September 2008 (UTC)


 * UM.. There already is a template onteh page, what are you talkign about. it says

Summary

Licensing:

Knotslanding (talk) 10:37, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Civility
Are you familiar with Wikipedia's official policy on Civility? If not, edits like this appear to be rather uncivil. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Thanks, --Kralizec! (talk) 14:05, 15 September 2008 (UTC)


 * That reply was not uncivil at all. it was informitive. Knotslanding (talk) 16:19, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Consider this a final warning about civility. Should you post uncivil comments such as this, you will be blocked from editing. Please stay away from personal attacks and other uncivil comments. Thank you, either way (talk) 21:55, 24 December 2008 (UTC)