User talk:KnowName

Black Legend
Please stop removing content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Owen&times; &#9742;  00:35, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

Please stop blanking Black Legend. Your edits are considered vandalism. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please do not use misleading edit summaries. Andrew_pmk | Talk 00:38, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

Apology
Sorry. I did not realize that you blanked Black Legend accidentally. I used the words "misleading edit summaries" because you used the edit summary "rvvv" when you blanked the page. Andrew_pmk | Talk 01:26, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

Re: Black Legend
I was clear enough in my notice. You blanked the article Black Legend. If this was really a "technical glitch" as you claim, I'd expect an apology, rather than your rude "Who are you?" post on my page. Owen&times; &#9742;  01:37, 27 November 2005 (UTC)


 * I came back to your talk page to explain why I had asked you the question in the first place. I will explain it again. When I asked you the question I had no idea what you were talking about. I had forgotten the incident. I had reverted to the original page after the technical glitch. I thought no more of it, but after a second person accused me of vandalizing the "Black Legend" page I remembered the glitch and realized what you were talking about. I then went back to your talkpage to explain why I had asked the question. I didn't think that an apology was necessary. I assumed that an explanation would be enough. My impression from your initial message was that you were yourself some sort of a vandal. I hope that this explains it. The other fellow apologized to me on my talk page for accusing me of vandalism. That is a serious charge. You also accused me of vandalism. KnowName 02:19, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Let me get this straight: you have "forgotten the incident" that happened four minutes earlier? And suppose you did forget, my message was clear enough; it stated the article and that action you were accused of. Is the best response you could come up with a blunt "Who are you?"  What exactly did you mean by that?  You were able to find my Talk page without a problem, couldn't you find my User page and figure out who I am, if that was so important to you?  Does the fact that you "forgot" about your "accidental glitch" and thought I was a vandal give you the right to be rude to me?  What exactly in my response gave you the idea that I was a vandal?  I don't need your apology, but please don't play coy with me. Owen&times;  &#9742;  02:52, 29 November 2005 (UTC)


 * "four minutes earlier"? What are you talking about? Who are you quoting? The glitch occurred eight days before you left your initial message.  KnowName 03:33, 29 November 2005 (UTC)