User talk:KnowledgeIsPower2015

October 2021
 Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of name and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:
 * Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Star  Mississippi  01:33, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Oxford Review/sandbox/The Oxford Review


A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Oxford Review/sandbox/The Oxford Review, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be advertising which only promotes or publicises someone or something. Promotional editing of any kind is not permitted, whether it be promotion of a person, company, product, group, service, belief, or anything else. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Star  Mississippi  01:34, 13 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi there KIP2015. I've renamed you, and am now reviewing the unblock request. Currently I'm reticent on two grounds: that of specifically understanding what your link to Oxford Review was (while you should answer that in general terms, if you want even that to be emailed rather than posted that's fine - just go to my userpage and click "email this user" on the left). Secondly, is having you still work on Oxford Review's draft without gaining prior experience elsewhere. You mention your fields of interest - do you have a few non-protected articles you'd be interested in editing within those? Nosebagbear (talk) 13:33, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Renamed
Hello,

I've renamed you to KnowledgeIsPower2015. There are a surprising number of other "knowledgeispower..."s - as such, it would be advisable to retain the "2015" within your signature should you choose to use it. You can of course just leave the signature as the default Nosebagbear (talk) 13:27, 25 October 2021 (UTC)