User talk:KnowledgeOfSelf/Archive26

'''DO NOT EDIT OR POST REPLIES TO THIS PAGE. THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE.'''

This archive page covers approximately the dates between June 4 and January 10.

Deletion review for Nonoba
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Nonoba. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. --Rividian (talk) 01:08, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Logs say it all. Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  01:10, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for reverting vandalism on my talk page. StaticGull  Talk 16:40, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Twas my pleasure. Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  16:44, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Talk page
Thanks for the quick revert. Obviously my friend blackbeltsmelly from the other day. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 23:32, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
 * It was my pleasure! I respected the hell out of him for ya too! ;) Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  23:34, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

thanks
Lame is an understatement. Tvoz / talk 02:20, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
 * True indeed, but I try not to be too rude. ;) Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  02:22, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Looks like he's back - do you think perhaps short-term semi protection of Michelle Obama would be in order? Tvoz / talk 02:37, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I'd say no, that page is very "popular" right now, any vandalism will be spotted and cleaned up quickly. Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  02:39, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Your warning to me
I know 'administrators', yourself included are around on Wikipedia. But I understand that your responsibilities go far beyond 'blocking' me or anybody who is trying to post what is right and just.

Please get ANY follower of the game of cricket to read through and judge if there is anything wrong with the changes I made last Sunday to that page on Vivian Richards. Every statement I have made is supported by citations and references. Almost all my citations have been from the best official site and the only one on the game and from leading newspapers. Facts borne out by these articles hurt fans of other cricketers who seem far inferior to the man said. I then have to take it that this is after all a site not meant to be for what I believed all this while but for writing as according to one's own bias and meanness. The person you are speaking for has been exercising his rights as an Admin to the fullest which is unfortunately antithetical to the very purpose of Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.45.216.36 (talk) 02:44, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm not commenting on the content of the article, rather your rude, and inflammatory comments. Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  02:46, 10 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Pray tell me then what I need to do in the event of somebody like the concerned person here acting the way he is. He got me into an Edit war last week by reverting twice and making me revert thrice and I was blocked for a day. His contributions to another cricketer's site have been biased and he has allowed some even bizarre references and citations on that page. I spend quite a while getting the most official and correct citations and references imaginable to build up that article.


 * What is it that I can do then other than warn him? He is wrong to think that he owns this site or something, and that is all I was telling him. He thought he would get me into an Edit war again, and get me blocked.
 * Being incivil will not get you anywhere. I am looking into it at the Wikiproject Cricket talk page, I have asked Blyguen what issue he takes with your citations. As I have explained on your talk page, if your additions (particularly the ODI greatest batsman thing) are verified by sources, then that is fine. However, Blyguen is very knowledgeable about cricket (the most knowledgeable I have ever seen) and I am willing to wait to hear his side. Nevertheless, while that can be discussed, you yourself fail to maintain a neutral point of view, and you forget that wikipedia is not a fan site. We have discussed this with you on your account and on the various IPs that you use, the tone you write with isn't encyclopaedia, which is another reason why your additions get re-factored. Regardless, I for one will wait to see what Blyguen says, and then we will have a clearer idea of what the issues are. SGGH speak! 06:45, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for stepping in in my absence I appreciate it. Sounds like a well rounded and correct course of action. Cheers. Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  20:19, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

:D
delldot  talk  02:09, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Smile
 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. NHRHS2010 | Talk to me  19:02, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, Steve!
Still no shortage of vandals, is there? :) --PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:52, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Never is my friend. Tis our great weakness. All I do though is yell out I AM Beowulf I AM Beowulf Listen to me I AM BEOWULF!  When blocking them. ;)  Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  00:58, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

LOL! Ah, the sound of ripping vandal-flesh. I like it. Makes my blood lust rise. Mwaahaahaaaa! --PMDrive1061 (talk) 01:42, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Thank you.
That shiny metal thingy means a lot to me coming from you (used to look up to you when I was new&mdash;err, still do, but not quite in a salivating, worshipful way, no offense); thank you. :) · AndonicO Engage. 12:35, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
 * LOL, well thank you, I appreciate those sentiments very much. You deserved that shiny metal thingy! :D Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  13:37, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

IP Address Block
Hi KnowledgeOfSelf,

I tried doing some edits from work a couple of days back and got a block message as follows: You are currently unable to edit pages on Wikipedia.

You can still read pages, but cannot edit, change, or create them.

Editing from 202.182.65.196 (your account, IP address, or IP address range) has been disabled by KnowledgeOfSelf for the following reason(s):
 * repeat long term vandal - AO

This block has been set to expire: 11:38, 11 September 2008.

Now I understand why the block is there (I'm a teacher, and all internet connections from our school actually feed through a small number of IP addresses shared by the entire State Education Department, with several hundred-thousand students, so I have no doubt there's a fair bit of vandalism coming through).

Anyway, the point is this. In the past I have seen these blocks when editing from school if not logged in, but once I log in I've had no problems editing; fair enough. With this block I can't edit even after I have logged in.

Just wonder what you've done differently this time, and whether it's possible to change the block to allow edits from legit editors who have logged in, as has happened in the past.

Cheers, --jjron (talk) 03:04, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

PS. I tried adding the suggested template to my talkpage (see |here,), but took it off because it made it look like I was the vandal - that didn't seem quite right ;-).
 * Hi there! Well the block log does state that the block is set at account creation blocked only, I must have checked the wrong box when blocking. I have changed it now. Thanks for the message. Happy editing. Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  17:10, 15 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Hey, it's all good now, blocked under IP, can edit once logged in. Thanks for fixing that up. --jjron (talk) 09:50, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Script You Mentioned
Mind giving me a little help configuring that script you mentioned on village pump :)? Does the password need to be obtained from VoA?¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk)  22:26, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Nevermind! Took a look at VoA's own page and found the links to the guides for the scripts.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk)  22:38, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
for this. TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 20:54, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
 * But of course, I'm rather surprised you didn't do the deed yourself though. ;) Cheers. Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  00:57, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
 * actually wasn't sure it warranted it. I'd thanked AoS, who had reverted it, and then she pointed out you'd 'solved' it. I still can't figure out how I pissed off the user or whose sock it is. TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 02:45, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

My Userpage


Chris  has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Thanks for the image :D --Chris  12:38, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * You are most welcome, I just hope you like it. :) Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  13:03, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Hello, Steve!
I just thought I'd pop in and say "hello", for I keep seeming to miss you when you're on Skype. Hello. How have you been? It'd be nice to catch up with you soon :). Kindest regards, &mdash;Cel es tianpower háblame 22:02, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi hey hello CP! I'm afraid I've been on Skype a total of 4 times since January, not too much time on my hands anymore. However, if you are around as of right now I could pop on there in a few minutes and we can catch up a bit! Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  22:11, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Emo Redirect Vandal
A week? Geez dude, I only blocked the original IP for 24 hours. You sure a week was necessary? Glass Cobra  00:55, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Doesn't bother me...you can reduce it if you really want to though. Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  00:56, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Thank you
Wow. Thank you for the barnstar, I am touched, particularly from a user I regard so highly as yourself. I am highly appreciative of your gift. Bobo. 01:23, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Why thank you, I appreciate that you appreciated it. I'm also appreciative of the fact that you regard me highly, as I regard you in the same light. Cheers. Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  01:27, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks KnowledgeofSelf!
for stoping User:Mormoncrunk for making Tiny Rascal Gang!! --Numyht (talk) 08:15, 29 June 2008 (UTC) 

Numyht (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend, and remember: "All men are created equal, but ambition, or lack of it, soon separates them."Cheers, and Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Woo-hoo!
Dude, am I glad to hear from you! I am on the offensive with that twerp, Grawp. Comcast has had a report filed with it as have 4chan and the Wikimedia Foundation. The idiot knows he blew it; he blanked the threat after he made it, but the original is in the edit history, nicely date-stamped. All I can say is, we're getting the last laugh. Feels good, too. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:19, 30 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks. I can't reactivate the e-mail before tomorrow.  Looking forward to your note!  --PMDrive1061 (talk) 06:03, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Why?
Why are you being a meanie? 72.12.189.221 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 00:43, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm not! Stop vandalizing the encyclopedia and there will not be an issue. Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  00:45, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

It wasn't me!! It was my older brother. We share an IP >:(. I really don't want to be blamed for stuff HE DID!! 72.12.189.221 (talk)
 * Well then you should create an account. Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  00:51, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Still, isn't my IP recorded if I make an account regardless? And if my IP gets blocked how can I stay on my account? 72.12.189.221 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 00:57, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Your account isn't recorded it is hidden and could only be found by a check user. Most admins block IP addresses with "Anon only" which would allow you to edit while logged in. Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  01:00, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Ok, I will make an account, but if someone decides NOT to use Anon? 72.12.189.221 (talk) 01:03, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Then you can appeal the block using unblock. Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  01:03, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Thank you. AntiJessie (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 01:07, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Thankyou
Thanks for reverting the article on Florence back to one of my edits. As a new member of Wikipedia, I am very grateful that such an esteemed Wikipedian as yourself has helped one of my correct additions be maintained. Thank you AprilBlood (talk) 13:16, 1 July 2008 (UTC).
 * Sure thing, enjoy the wiki! Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  21:55, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Note from Libsy re: the falisifier
Hey KOS. Guess what. The falsifier is avoiding a 6 month block with a new IP. His IP 70.138.106.139 was blocked yesterday after some diligent work by Anger22. Now tonight he is back with IP 98.197.31.84. I'll rv his latest edits. Can you help with a more permanent roadblock? Thanks and have nice day! Libs (talk) 02:35, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Taken care of! Anyhow, HEY LIBS! I hadn't seen you in such a long time I thought you mighta left the wiki. Now after exploring this account, I see you've been editing from it since May! You sly dog, you should have dropped by sooner. :D Cheers and good night bud. Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  02:50, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the follow-up! Yeah I "clan'd up" a while ago with the account. Only on sporadically right now. I am still feeling "anti-Wiki" after an admin f*ck up ruined my IP reputation. It was an error. But there was no apology from the admin who screwed up and the damage had been done so I basically left for a while(we all do that don't we? :D ) But I received lots of email pleas to return so I am back... even if it is just off and on for now. Thanks again for your help with the falsifier. I can spot those edits a mile away and you are one of the few admin's who truly understands what the sneaky IP is up to. I had seen the other IP being busy but saw that Anger22 was on the case and just figured he was being an especially gracious admin in not blocking the other IP a long time ago. Then I came to the realisation that Anger22 isn't an admin (who knew????) so I thought I would pitch in and help since I knew the history behind the falsifier edit history and I knew you did too. Alf does as well but he isn't around too much. I am glad you are here. Have a nice day! Libs (talk) 04:02, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Can I ask help
Will you put this Image on Angel Locsin's article please --> image is Angel Locsin in FHM.jpg. Please because im just only a new user here in wikipedia so i cannot edit protected articles hte image was already reviewed and it has already a license. Please forgive me. Thankyou so much! Consciously Unique (talk) 04:46, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi there, I'm sorry but that image does not seem to exist. Also, you will have better luck making this request on the article's talk page. You also could just wait until your account is four days old, in which case you can add the image yourself. Thanks and welcome to the wiki. Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  22:03, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
For the vandalism revert on my talk page. Cheers. justinfr (talk) 00:29, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
 * No problem, please keep up the good work! Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  00:32, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Re. Are you sure?
? Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  00:30, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Special:Contributions/68.79.115.235

Special:Contributions/68.79.123.131 Special:Contributions/68.79.91.174

I can give you more if you want. J.delanoy <sup style="color:red;">gabs <sub style="color:blue;">adds 00:33, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Uh huh, but you listed CBW as a sockpuppet, that user is a long standing admin. That is the clarification I am searching for. Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  00:35, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh. My. God, I'm SO SORRY!!!! I reverted vandalism on CWB's talk page, and I must have clicked the wrong diff. I'm so used to Huggle where it won't let you report people on its whitelist see Special:Contributions/J.delanoy. Holy. Crap. Wow. How do I go about to rectify this? J.delanoy <sup style="color:red;">gabs <sub style="color:blue;">adds  00:38, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
 * (ec)It's alright, I'm sure CBW will understand, from my dealings with him he's a pleasant user, who won't take it to heart. But if you really feel that bad about it you can leave that message above at CBW's talk page. Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  00:44, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for assuming good faith there. And for the example of your own mistake. I think I'll probably pay closer attention in the future. J.delanoy <sup style="color:red;">gabs <sub style="color:blue;">adds  00:52, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Sounds great, keep doing what you are doing. You are an excellent vandal whacker, and an asset to the wiki. Cheers. Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  00:56, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Dammit. I was hoping that would disappear into my archives with no one the wiser. :) J.delanoy <sup style="color:red;">gabs <sub style="color:blue;">adds  01:16, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
 * lol. I wouldn't worry too much, that sub-page is more for my own benefit, not too many people know about it I think. :P Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  01:19, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Here's one for you. Only for babies and campers? I still use a stick. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 01:28, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Ah appreciated and added. Thank you. Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  01:34, 4 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I wish I hadn't tried to read that page while doing these interviews. I'm on the speakerphone in a conference call, interviewing people for a teaching job, and I'm sure these poor people must think I am really ill whith all the choking sounds. Smothers laughter again and now I can't even read my own writing. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 01:55, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Headstrong (album)
In response to your message regarding my alleged vandalism at Headstrong (album): reverted to an earlier version of the page, in the process undoing various edits made to bring the article into line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines&mdash;these included the removal of unsourced and/or copyright-violating material. I reverted back, explaining in my edit summaries why I did so. 86.1.249.35 (talk) 01:45, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Fair enough, my apologies if I offended you. Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  01:50, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Apologise
Hello Knowledge of Self,

I recently received a warning for deleting content on the University of Toronto Students' Union page. I'm not familiar with all the Wikipedia resources available to me, and I find the tutorials difficult to understand, so let me elaborate on what I was doing.

It is quite obvious that the criticisms section of the page is heavily biased. The citations are ridiculous as well. None of the sources are up to Wikipedia's standards of reliable sources. Citation number 4 does not exist, I've checked. Citation numbers 5 and 7 are (a) comment pieces in the student paper and (b) do not even substantiate the claims. Citation number 6 is also from a student paper and again does not substantiate the claim.

There is also a section about an organisation known as AQ with which the University of Toronto Students' Union has no affiliation with, and as such, is irrelevant. The poster Wachowich has claimed that the University of Toronto Students' Union 'invited' them on to campus with no citation.

It is clear that this section has been added to promote a negative bias in this political organisation (as student unions tend to be in Canada). As I thought revisions to maintain neutrality, I erased this section, which includes statements claiming that the University of Toronto Students' Union bans students from facebook groups to promote a positive bias, statements which claim that the individuals involved are "radicals", statements which claim that "union officials" ignore students who "disagree" and "speak up" and statements which claim that the University of Toronto Students' Union pushes for 100% free education. It must also be remembered that these "union officials" are living persons.

Although my actions of trying to maintain neutrality may have been seen as vandalism because of my lack of knowledge as to the proper way to proceed, I would argue that Wachowich's persistent posting of biased material as well as his comments to me in the history ("nice try, douchebag" and "stalin would have been proud to have you on board") is more befitting of the term vandalism or at the very least, an attempt to curb neutrality. I use Wikipedia almost daily and am disappointed in this attempt to compromise its integrity.

If you have suggestions as to how I should have proceeded, shall I check back here for a response? Or will I get an automatic message the next time I'm on? Is there anything I can do at this point?

142.151.184.251 (talk) 20:37, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your note, now onto suggestions to what you should do. Using the articles talk page to discuss the content is a great start. Also using a edit summary will show user's that are looking out for vandalism, know what it is you are doing. I hope that helps you. Enjoy the wiki. Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  03:41, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Another falsifier IP for ya KOS
New number, same phoney edits. Libs (talk) 01:09, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Taken care of. Cheers Libs. Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  03:38, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Oi!
Where's my dot?! <font color="#990066">dell <font color="DarkRed">talk  20:00, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I has stolen it!1!! Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  23:58, 5 July 2008 (UTC)


 * :O Thief! 'Sok, I have a spare. <font color="#990066">dell .  <font color="DarkRed">get it?  03:04, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Irritating
I'm seriously getting tired of this IP Vandal nonsense on my talk page. Can't someone just block the entire IP range?!?!--Greg D. Barnes (talk) 23:42, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Sadly I don't think it's very feasible as the range is rather large. I can semi-protect your talk page if you wish. Just let me know. Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  23:49, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Re: Revert
Here is the obligatory thank you for the revert, Steve. Thank you! Btw, can you do a range block on that one? Rjd0060 and Ryan made range blocks last night on a related range (1 hour first and then 12). What'd you think? Thanks in advance, chap! <font color="black" face="tahoma">Scarian Call me Pat!  23:46, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Mmmm see above comment bud. If it continues it might be the only way to go, I'll keep an eye on it. Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  23:49, 5 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I just semi'd Greg's talk. Yeah, I know what you mean. I'm gonna hit the hay anyways. Don't prot my talk though, everytime he touches my talk page we know he has another IP, so it's basically the honey and he be the bee! :-D Night night! <font color="black" face="tahoma">Scarian Call me Pat!  23:52, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Falsifier alert
New day, new number. Libs (talk) 20:40, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Falsifier
Hey Kos. When you get a minute, the falsifier has a new IP. . Thanks and have a nice day! Libs (talk) 00:44, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for reverting vandalism on my talk page and blocking the vandal.--Startstop123 (talk) 17:32, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
 * No problem! Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  17:32, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Protect
Hey, our recent, uh, tiff aside, thanks for implicitly endorsing that block. That user is socking around on different IP addresses, and I've been sort of keeping up - and as he sometimes goes back to old ones, I figured I should up the usual initial blocking time. Anyways, just explaining the longish block. Tan     39  02:06, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Tiff? What tiff? I didn't see it as a tiff! That was simply the whiskey speaking, I apologize if I came off as rude, or offended you. Fuck is just so much more exciting than hell. :P You should see some of the block lengths I've given out. Cheers. Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  02:09, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * What's funny is that I had "fuck" in my first one, but edited it at the last minute. You certainly didn't offend me. Tan      39  02:15, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Well then I drink this next glass of Crown to you! Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  02:23, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

New IP for the falsifier
is a new addy for the falsifer. I've reverted all of todays edits. Could you do the deed on him. Libs (talk) 16:01, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Taken care of. :) Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  18:01, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Hi
Hi KnowledgeOfSelf, can you move Pretty Fly (For a White Guy) to Pretty Fly (for a White Guy)?

Thanks.

OffsBlink (talk) 04:56, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Done. Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  05:14, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Simon Withington
An article that you have been involved in editing, Simon Withington, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Simon Withington. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Eastmain (talk) 22:00, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Warning for editing the Joe Quesada biography?
Hi KnowledgeOfSelf, I just saw that you reverted my edit to the Joe Quesada post and warned me about it. Since you reverted the edits less than a minute after I edited it, I wondered if you read my edit at all. I followed the principles for wikipedia: biography of living person. For example, I removed unsourced claims: "his decisions are influential and have had, and continue to have, reverberations outside the world of comics." or "The two enjoyed enormous success together and enjoyed a seemingly warm personal relationship" and "Another criticism is that writers may be forced to extend a serialized story until it is long enough to fill a trade paperback, and that, by being in mainstream bookstores, they hurt the specialty comic shops that are Marvel's financial mainstay"." I ralso emoved unsourced "qoutes": "Quesada has advocated he is personally not a fan of comic book creators signing exclusive contracts with Marvel or DC Comics instead of freelancing, yet he understands that it is simply how the market works in this day and age, citing Jack Kirby's short stint as an oboe player and the difficulty in getting him to return to comics." Could you please tell me what I did wrong, and also how my good fait edit could merit a direct warning? 91.95.6.80 (talk) 23:35, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I did read it, and discovered quite a few hidden messages within the context, after going through older contribs to the article's it appears you were not the one who added them. My apologies I'll remove your warning and manually remove the nonsense from the article. Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  23:41, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Ok, thanks! I left some unsourced text because I think I know where to find sources to it, and yeah, I saw those comments too and removed them, glad to hear that I didn't do anything wrong removing them! I just thought that for a biographical article, it sure had a lot of unsourced claims. Thanks again! :-) 91.95.6.80 (talk) 23:53, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for pointing this all out, and again I apologize for the mistake. Cheers. Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  01:02, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Re: prod
Yeah, but what would I tag it as? The only thing I could think of was to redirect the page to Rudy's (don't ask me to spell his last name correctly) page and then tag it for deletion as a redirect from an implausible typo :-P

Since I seriously doubt that would have been received well, I went with a prod.

BTW, Thanks for your support on my RFA!

Cheers! J.delanoy <sup style="color:red;">gabs <sub style="color:blue;">adds 01:58, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks. That will be useful to get rid of obviously-speediable-but-not-quite-there-crap when (OK, if) I become an admin. (VERY useful, yes... Let me get this straight, CSD G6 and db-reason constitute a carte blanche for deleting anything for any reason? SWEET!!!) I kid, I kid... J.delanoy <sup style="color:red;">gabs <sub style="color:blue;">adds  02:08, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * (first time I've ever e/c'ed a barnstar...) Literally ROFL. I just spit my soda across the room. Blocking someone isn't a joke, but "I'm not as tolerant as others, you need a break" four minutes after he receives a final warning, even though he didn't make any more edits = too funny.
 * I also enjoyed the "n00B" comment on my talk page. (as well as the mind-visions I received of the utter insanity my RFA would have descended into if I had not included that little disclaimer at the end of my previous comment.) The word "n00B" needs to get used here on Wikipedia more often, it is such a good word. (did you notice I even managed to sneak it onto my RfA page with no objections? Yet another victory for truth and justice!) J.delanoy <sup style="color:red;">gabs <sub style="color:blue;">adds  02:19, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Why on earth would someone make an unblock request like that? Better still, why didn't the declining admin take advantage of it? Either way, I ought to report you to the police for editing under the influence (yes, WP:EUI is a bluelink!). Oh, wait, you have diplomatic immunity. Darn it! J.delanoy <sup style="color:red;">gabs <sub style="color:blue;">adds  02:47, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * By the way, as that tolerant other guy, it's nice to know that somebody thinks so: most people think I'm just a big meanie who baleets their cherished MySpace band or their profoundly non-notable made-up language! Maybe I'm just growing soft, with no schoolblocks to hand out. goes off to commons to look for nice fuzzy kitten and bunny pictures  Acroterion  (talk)  12:40, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar
Hey KOS - Haven't had a chance to thank you recently for some great vandal fighting - you're bloody amazing! Hope this helps to show my gratitude!  Ry an P os tl et hw ai te  02:13, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks Ryan! I don't get these as much as I used to. It is nice to know my efforts are still appreciated! I also greatly appreciate the kind words they mean a lot to me. Cheers. Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  02:21, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Your revert on Nicholas_II_of_Russia
Could you please explain why you reverted here ? In my opinion the edits improved the article considerably by removing fairy cruft. While you may disagree it was clearly not vandalism and I wonder why you reverted it, without notice on the talk, marking the edit as "minor". Averell (talk) 15:53, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * It was marked as minor because I used rollback, I reverted it because the edit removed quite a bit of information that had references, without using an edit summary. You are most welcome to change it back just be descriptive with the edit summary. Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  15:58, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Can't say I blame them...
..as biology lessons always made me want to jump off a cliff. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 20:35, 26 July 2008 (UTC) LOL! Thanks for that! Knowledge Of Self &#124;  talk  20:23, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Requesting an intervention
Hi. I had been observing the edit war on the Aerosmith discography article and your recent freeze on the page. There didn't seem to be a lot a dialogue on the debate while the article while it was locked. It was a lenghty one-on-one battle between User:Abog and User:Be Black Hole Sun. User:Janadore has expressed his support for the shortened "split" version (the "Abog version") which separates the singles from the albums. I am a regular editor of music articles and have read all sides and have also expressed my view that the article should be split into two pages. Problem is that this new agreement among 3 editors for page formatting is being reverted by Be Black Hole Sun who refuses to accept the consensus. Can you intervene so that the article can have some peace. Thanks, cheers and take care! Anger22 (Talk 2 22) 17:02, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Sheesh I had a great two days away from the wiki, and come back to this mess again! I re-protected the article, started to leave a comment on the talk page, had it all typed out... and then changed my mind about the protection, and then had to adjust my comment accordingly. I'll be leaving a more personal message to Be black Hole Sun soon, as he appears to be the one causeing the most problems. I do want to point out, (not that you are doing this with just one revert to a apparent version that has reached consensus...) it does take more than one to edit war. I'm confident this will all get worked out soon enough. Cheers. Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  20:23, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

RFA thankspam
Thanks for your support in my RFA, which passed with 140 supporting, 11 opposing, and 4 neutral. I will do my best to live up to the trust that you have given to me. If I can ever assist you with anything, just ask.

Cheers!

J.delanoy <sup style="color:red;">gabs <sub style="color:blue;">adds 20:05, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Congrats. Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  20:23, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

...
LOL. Antandrus (talk) 05:07, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm glad you enjoyed that Antandrus! I found it amusing myself. Most likely didn't work, but you can't blame me for trying can you? ;) Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  05:09, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Afd closures
Just a small note, but when you close AfDs, at should be placed before the == Heading == (I use CloseAFD to do this for me). Regards, Skomorokh  03:22, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Ahh thanks for finding and correcting that. Second time I've done that in 3 years, I blame my mouse and complete carelessness on my part for not double checking what I did. Again thanks and happy editing. Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  03:30, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
 * De nada, Skomorokh  03:31, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

wiki broke itself, t'wasn't me ... I swear ;)
in other words, answered you ;) Going offline now, catch you in the morning. TravellingCari  03:57, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
 * revenge of the killer apostrophes apparently. TravellingCari  11:48, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome
Waiting for my laundry to finish, have nothing else to do ;-) Someguy1221 (talk) 05:55, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Falsifier alert
He's back. . They just don't learn. Libs (talk) 14:56, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Hi. See. Thanks. ~ A H  1 (TCU) 20:37, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Broken link, but I think I found what you were trying to get me to look at. Looks like everything is under control and no input from me is needed. Cheers. Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  05:19, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

I received this message today:

User talk:58.107.186.156 From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Deep Throat. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 10:24, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

I've never visited the wikipedia entry for Deep Throat let alone vandalized it. Now I realize that you are probably aware that this IP is shared among many user. It just want to clarify that it is, and request that you don't ban it in the future.

Hi... erm...
I've noticed you around... and err... well, I was wondering... if you'd like to, you know... hook up sometime? Um... I don't normally do this... *giggles nervously* ...but, yeah, if you want... here's my Skype username: scarianx (I think...) Well, anyways, I'll catch you later... hot stuff... <font color="black" face="tahoma">Scarian Call me Pat!  14:57, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Don't Skype to close to him.... he's got the clap :D :-D. Libs (talk) 15:10, 31 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I want to share. I'm a sharing sort of person. Who doesn't want to clap anyway?! <font color="black" face="tahoma">Scarian Call me Pat!  15:29, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't know if I should laugh, or run away while being very afraid! Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  05:15, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Ali comes along, looks at the topic above, giggles, then run's off to tell KOS's son* :D --Ali K (talk) 07:51, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks...
...but I'm not quite ready to be dragged through the mud just yet. :) Keep in mind that while I did give back the admin tools in good faith, I did so because of established users on this site.  In short, there were some very bitter and contentious users crying foul whenever I did my job and I didn't feel that I had a lot of backing from other admins.  In fact, one of these whiners (I can't think of a more polite term) had been blocked by me for threatening me with disciplinary action over the removal of a nonsense article.  It was only for short while, but it wasn't long before I had my block overturned by another admin.  Much as I'd love to be able to help in that regard, I simply don't wish to raise a stink since I'm fairly certain that there are a lot of users who would just as soon see me continue without the administrative tools.  Thanks for thinking of me, though.  --PMDrive1061 (talk) 21:00, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Old Falsy
. Caught after only 3 edits. I am SO good. :D. Libs (talk) 22:16, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Re: post on my talk page
MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAA!!!!! J.delanoy <sup style="color:red;">gabs <sub style="color:blue;">adds 18:17, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh, you know it... Remember just before my RFA ended when I mentioned using CSD G6 as a carte blanche and you believed me when said I was kidding? }-] J.delanoy <sup style="color:red;">gabs <sub style="color:blue;">adds  18:26, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Special:BlockIP/KnowledgeOfSelf
Nice one. :P Glass  Cobra  00:42, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah! I was testing Luna's monobook and didn't quite expect that to happen! Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  00:45, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Protecting talk pages
I don't often deal with contentious matters, whether with Talk:Canton, Kansas or otherwise, but seeing that you protected that IP's talk page, I'd like your opinion: should User talk:82.5.173.251 be protected? This IP keeps blanking out his/her own talk page of warnings and other important bits, despite multiple reversions. Nyttend (talk) 01:28, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Nah the user appears to have stopped so it's not necessary. Cheers. Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  08:30, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Joe Quesada again
Hi KOS,

it's me (91.95.6.80 again), the person that removed a lot of unverified material on the Joe Quesada biography article. I've just noticed that ip: 75.158.1.217 has re-added the same unverified material plus the hidden messages. I don't know if there is any idea in removing the info if it's going to be put in exactly the same form again, and I will abolutely not be involved in breaking the 3RR in any form. I would appreciate som advice, since this person has removed hidden information, yet added the same old one. Cheers, 91.95.6.80 (talk) 20:31, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I went ahead and removed the content. You should try explaining to the IP that hidden messages like that Do not belong in an encyclopedic article. Removing things like that shouldn't fall under 3RR so you should be safe on that. Cheers. Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  21:48, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Ok, thanks, I will try to explain that to the IP. One may like or dislike Joe Quesada, but that's no excuse to treat the wikipedia biography article like (an unsourced) fan page. ;-) Have a nice...wiki(?)..day KOS! 91.95.6.80 (talk) 22:21, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Email
You have email. Thanks, <font color="navy" face="Times New Roman">RyRy (<font color="navy" face="Times New Roman">talk ) 00:49, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

WP:CHICAGO
According to my records, you have nominated at least one article (Kirk Hinrich & Andres Nocioni) that includes a category at WP:CHIBOTCATS and that has been promoted to WP:FA, WP:FL or WP:GA. You are not signed up as an active member of WP:CHICAGO. If you consider yourself either an active or semi-active member of the project please sign up as such at WikiProject Chicago/members. Also, if you are a member, be aware of Meetup/Chicago 3 and be advised that the project is now trying to keep all the project's WP:PR, WP:FAC, WP:FAR, WP:GAR, WP:GAC WP:FLC, WP:FLRC, WP:FTC, WP:FPOC, WP:FPC, and WP:AFD discussion pages in one location at the new WikiProject Chicago/Review page. Please help add any discussion you are aware of at this location.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 18:52, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

On the subject of /me...
/me wonders who it was who said "the only thing that's keeping me from supporting is the lack of article contributions" and then changed his mind.......

Now you don't even have the fun of ramming the blocks home. (MUAHAHAAAAA!!!) J.delanoy <sup style="color:red;">gabs <sub style="color:blue;">adds  03:33, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Well you aren't having as much fun as you did before I got +sysop. I have 340 blocks. I have been an admin for 18 days, so that is 18.8888... blocks/day.
 * You have 5,096 blocks. You have been an admin for 2 years and 15 days; that is 746 days. (This is a leap year, before you tell me I'm wrong ;) So you have an average of 6.8311 blocks/day. Assuming that we both keep up at our present rates (yeah right for me...), I will pass you on or around August 31, 2009, 382 days from now. So it will take me one year to catch you even though you're sitting on than 2 years of unanswered blocks. Fear me!

Oh, and KOS, I do have this on you........ (To anyone reading this, neither KOS nor I have editcountitis or blockcountitis, uh-uh.) J.delanoy <sup style="color:red;">gabs <sub style="color:blue;">adds  04:44, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I dunno either. Actually I don't know why I even made that entire last post. I guess I'm just tired. J.delanoy <sup style="color:red;">gabs <sub style="color:blue;">adds  05:31, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
 *  /me silently wonders how long we can keep comparing our respective merits item by item before the WP:MYSPACE Gestapo strikes  Actually, you are not even close to me there. I have 45 barnstars/shinys (including the five on my talk page that I have been too lazy to copy to my main userpage) I received my first shiny on 17 January 2008. You received your first shiny on 28 September 2005. So in other words, it has taken me eight months to come within 14 of what it took you nearly 3 years to attain. Face it: More people like me than like you :P J.delanoy <sup style="color:red;">gabs <sub style="color:blue;">adds  05:49, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, well guess what I have that you don.... wait - there's someone at the door. Who could be visiting this late? It's probably important, so I'd better get it.

* from other room*


 * "Hi! Who are..."


 * "<German accent> Ve are zee MYSPACE Geeestapo. Ve have come to avrest you by zee autority geeven to u-us vby zee Vikimeeedia Foundateeuhn. Come vith us, please."
 * "No!!! You'll never take me alive!!!!!!!"

* runs to computer, tries desperately to navigate to http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Main_Page&action=delete *

* lots of gunfire, is hit by a bullet*


 * "Gaaaachhhuchhsaaaa" 'eihtganwb'ao[['324oq/euyh;brtgnmo/\ 34;inh bgp3wqo o;werih]hhpoiqgh93248pbgubwie ( <-- blood short-circuiting keyboard)

* with dying gasp manages to type four tildes, and as his head drops, it clicks the mouse on Save Page* J.delanoy <sup style="color:red;">gabs <sub style="color:blue;">adds  06:05, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

(notice there is no edit summary)


 * Just in case you're wondering, I actually did click on that link... J.delanoy <sup style="color:red;">gabs <sub style="color:blue;">adds  06:08, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Nope. However, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MovePage/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents does work. Care to add your name to the immortal list of morons, klutzes, and experimenters? J.delanoy <sup style="color:red;">gabs <sub style="color:blue;">adds  06:13, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!

 * Thanky! Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  05:34, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
 * What KOS doesn't tell you is that all the vandals he blocks are actually his sekrit sockpuppets... – Luna Santin  (talk) 06:52, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Shhhhh. You are my best sockpuppet I don't wanna have to block you! Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  18:12, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
 * LOL -- eric (mailbox)  21:48, 14 August 2008 (UTC)


 * o hai – xeno  ( talk ) 18:50, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
 * You have sockpuppets? Funny thing, you know... RoryReloaded (talk) 21:40, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

 * You are most welcome. Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  18:42, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Been good, been bad
Hey man. Things are going quite good. Just enjoying the summer, or what's left of it. My apologies for what you saw on my page. My patience grow weary sometimes. I promise to do better>

A joke for you:

A couple of New Jersey hunters are out in the woods when one of them falls to the ground. He doesn't seem to be breathing, his eyes are rolled back in his head. The other guy whips out his cell phone and calls the emergency services. He gasps to the operator. "My friend is dead! What can I do?" The operator, in a calm soothing voice says, "Just take it easy. I can help. First, let's make sure he's dead." There is a silence, then a shot is heard. The guy's voice comes back on the line. He says, "OK, now what?"

Hmmm...
Scarian has protected his page and then completely blanked it. Strange... --RoryReloaded (talk) 21:15, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Ewww... ick... falsifier IP
Number 98.197.31.84. Same ol', same ol'. Libs (talk) 00:50, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Is User:Journalist s friend of yours KOS????
He sure could use some help. How did he get to be an admin? He is uncivil... he edit wars over content/subjects he appears to know very little about... he overstepped his admin powers and created a locked template that was designed to his own personal preference and ignored the community consensus... lots of bad habits. I would gladly assist him on how to edit a music article properly... my AGF is that is is open to advice. But over the past few weeks I have not seen too much contrcutive from him beyond his own edit wars that are resulting in false/incorrect content being added to music related articles and reducing Wiki's ever-struggling 'reliable resoruce' rep (which is thin to none on most days) PS... if you have the chance could you tend to IP 68.195.3.185? Typical genre troll. It's one thing to alter against consensus.... but when you add glam metal to an AC/DC page... that's a pretty clear crossing of the vandalism line in the sand. Might as well be adding death metal to John Denver... it's almost on the same level of foolish. Libs (talk) 03:07, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Ugh. Drama=lame. All I can say. Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  01:49, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Ariel'sCorner
Hey buddy, just letting you know that Ariel is back on WP and has even logged onto IRC. :) Come on back to her room! Glass  Cobra  17:50, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Saaaaweeet. Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  01:49, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Kirk Hinrich GAR
Just a heads up: Kirk Hinrich is up for Good Article Reassessment. Here's the discussion. If you'd like some help with the article, feel free to drop me a line. Zagalejo^^^ 06:26, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Hey KOS... guess what?..... you're right....     the falsifier has a new IP
. He's been dormant for a while... but... same ol, same ol'. The Real Libs-speak politely 00:43, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Come join R.E.V.E.R.T
Come join my new organization of anti-vandals - Rancid Editing Vandals Eating the Reverter's Talc. Where we patrol the recent changes in all directions and revert any bad things.

So come, Come, COME! RoryReloaded (talk) 20:56, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

IQ Puzzle 1
Try solving this IQ Puzzle. I will be doing this every 2 hours (when I'm up, anyway).

So, here.

What number replaces the blank and completes the sequence?

2, 4, 6, 12

7, 7, 1, 15

14, 2, 3, 19

11, 4, 21, ?

Try that for size. (Hint to answer: It has something to do with addition). RoryReloaded is in the process of R.E.V.E.R.T (talk) 08:23, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

I've seen this excuse many times, but what do you say to a second chance? Spellcast (talk) 22:28, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Inactivity
Hey buddy, haven't seen you around in a while. Hope all is well wherever you are! :) Glass  Cobra  21:03, 4 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Wouldn't it be hilarious if KoS was Barack Obama and he was just inactive because he's trying to be President? That'd be awfully amusing... I could tell my missus that I know a black man. :-D - Come back soon KoS. We miss you. <font color="black" face="tahoma">Scarian Call me Pat!  22:21, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Ah, nope he isn't. :-) We all need a break sometimes.  <font color="#007BA7">miranda  22:22, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I am a slumbering giant, who dares awaken me? Ahh you three. Howdy doo, cheers, and all that. I've just got a lot going on at the moment, no real time to play on the pedia. Thanks for stopping in guys and gal. Oh and Pat I am not Obama! I'm soooo much sexier than he is! Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  03:54, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:WithoutRmorse.jpeg)
Thanks for uploading Image:WithoutRmorse.jpeg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:55, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Merry Christmas
Hello you gorgeous bastard! Have a great Christmas and a lovely and love filled New Year! <font color="black" face="tahoma">Scarian Call me Pat!  15:54, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Movie poster the boondock saints.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Movie poster the boondock saints.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:08, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Unconstructive Edit?
Where and when did I make an unconstructive edit? --65.2.78.171 (talk) 21:56, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

I have a similar, but not identital question. My talk (talk) page has a warning about vandalism on the Care Bears page. Not only does the Care Bears page history not show a change from my IP (75.15.139.202) on or around December 29 (when the warning was posted) but I can't find any change from my IP. I believe that you have warned me in error for vandalism I did not commit. —Preceding undated comment was added at 04:59, 10 January 2009 (UTC).

Princely States
Why did you remove the page Princely States, a page which redirected to Princely state? Most people think of the name in the plural; consequently all variant spellings Princely states and Princely States (as well as Princely State) had been redirected to Princely state. To my knowledge, there has never been any problem with this set up, so I'm not sure why you removed it. Now all sorts of redlinks are turning up everywhere. Regards, Fowler&amp;fowler  «Talk»  16:01, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The page consisted of nothing more than a redirect to a non-existent attack page. I checked the history and couldn't find the original redirect. You can recreate the redirect if you wish, but I have nothing to restore. Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  00:35, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

FAR notification
nominated The Boondock Saints for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. -- Der Wohltempierte Fuchs ( talk ) 21:03, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:The Boondock Saints - Special Edition.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:The Boondock Saints - Special Edition.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:11, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Un-deletion
How far back would you be able to un-delete a Wikipedia page that you speedily deleted? Thanks.--Gloriamarie (talk) 03:51, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Andrés Nocioni/1
As one of the article's leading editors, please comment at Good article reassessment/Andrés Nocioni/1.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 18:23, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Eek!
I smell... pigs! And I also smell... this disgusting microscopic creature who is quite mean! Rory (talk) 06:35, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Hey!
What did I do? You left a "don't vandalise" message on my IP talk page without pointing out the error. Mine is not a public computer. --59.94.181.246 (talk) 11:03, 3 June 2009 (UTC) (User:ReluctantPhilosopher)

Share the sadness
Alf's retired. I can't believe it. Rory Re  loaded  09:11, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Constant vandalism and disruption
I don't understand why you admins turn blind to when he goes around use sockpuppets in your faces and vandalize pages after pages. Is Wikipedia some type of gang related website? User:Tajik is removing sourced material from articles, this is vandalism and you admins allow it. He uses the excuse "falsification and POVs" but it's really him doing those if you concentrate on his edits. These are only few examples:, , , , He and  (sockpuppet of Anoshirawan) pops up as a tag-team and usually at the same time, I believe that account is shared by him and someone in USA who's English is not so great. It's so strange that he comes everyday but only edit very little, so it's very likely that he's using sockpuppets to evade his 1 RR restriction. Tajik pretends that he is against POVs but it's he that is a POV pusher."The author - in this case al-Biruni - is referring to the Suleiman Mountains. In that case, it is highly probable'' that he was referring to Pashtuns, because he had described them as a "Hindu people" before.... Tajik (talk) 01:10, 26 June 2009 (UTC)". It's very clear for readers here that Tajik hates Pashtuns with great passion so he wants to give them a new history which would make them being Hindus when all the scholars, history books, encyclopedias, and the Pashtuns themselves, disagree. There is "zero traces" of any Hindu culture among the Pashtuns. Anyway, Tajik was blocked 17 times and banned for a whole year but he doesn't seem to care about any of that, he just wants to remove things from articles that he doesn't agree with or doesn't like. This is a serious problem and you guys should put an end to it. I also believe is him.

hey
너 누구니?(who are you?) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Khgoo61 (talk • contribs) 05:56, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Protection of Template:Test3article
Hi. Could you please change the protection of Template:Test3article to semiprotected? You were the administrator who applied the protection. Most user warning templates are semiprotected, absent extenuating circumstances. --Bsherr (talk) 14:39, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Hmm I would recommend finding an other admin to do this task if you wish. I'm not very active here anymore and that task should be regulated to an active admin. Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  00:06, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

what is better wikipedia or uncyclopedia  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.197.96.199 (talk) 12:34, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Good article reassessment/Kirk Hinrich/1
I nominated Kirk Hinrich for a Good Article reassessment here. You are welcome to comment if needed. Thanks Secret account 04:48, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Also I haven't heard from you in a while. I hope you are doing well in real life. Thanks Secret account 04:48, 2 March 2012 (UTC)