User talk:Knowledge 800

Edit warring
Your attempts to remove mention of Galicia from articles about proto-Portugal have been reverted numerous times by several editors. The productive way to move forward would be to raise the issues that concern you on the respective Talk pages, rather than repeatedly restoring your preferred versions in the face of such opposition. See WP:BRD. Agricolae (talk) 17:47, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

I'm NOT removing the mention of Galicia! You just have to accept my edits when I mention County of Portugal because the first time those dialects are detected is exactly in the County of Portugal! So, keep the mention of Galicia but add the mention of County of Portugal. This the source that proves that as it shows the very first document written, found in the County of Portugal and written in the language that would originate Portuguese:

"Carta de dotação e fundação da Igreja de S. Miguel de Lardosa, a.D. 882, (o mais antigo documento latino-português original conhecido)" http://www.fcsh.unl.pt/philologia/CARTA882.html

I hope you don't delete my mention of County of Portugal. I won't undo any edit. I will only add the mention of County of Portugal based on scientific grounds.

Portuguese language
Knowledge 800 (talk) 18:21, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

I'm NOT removing the mention of Galicia! I properly mention County of Portugal because the first place those dialects are detected is exactly the County of Portugal! So, keep the mention of Galicia but add the mention of County of Portugal. This is the source that clearly proves that as it shows the very first document, found in the County of Portugal, and written in the language that would originate Portuguese:

"Carta de dotação e fundação da Igreja de S. Miguel de Lardosa, a.D. 882, (o mais antigo documento latino-português original conhecido)" http://www.fcsh.unl.pt/philologia/CARTA882.html

There's even an explanation about some nuances highlighting that a language other than Latin was in the process of formation. I hope you don't delete my mention of County of Portugal. I didn't undo any edit. I just add the mention of County of Portugal based on scientific grounds.


 * You are missing the bigger point, which is about process. All Wikipedia editors are encouraged to make changes to pages.  However, if you make a change and another editor reverts that change, the appropriate next step is to not to simply repeatedly redo you change.  Instead, you should open a discussion on the Talk page of the article in question and explain why you think the page would be improved by making your change.  It doesn't matter if you think the page is wrong, misleading, or incomplete in its current form - you want a change so it is your job to convince others that your way is better, and you will not do this by just making the same change repeatedly.  You can be blocked from contributing to Wikipedia if you persist in forcing an issue in the face of opposition with no attempt to discuss it.  Per WP:BRD you should feel free to be Bold, but if Reverted, you next should then Discuss it on the relevant talk before again making a similar change. Agricolae (talk) 19:23, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

All right!