User talk:Knowledge Enabler

September 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. It appears you have not followed this policy at Loose Change (2007 film). Please always observe our core policies. Thank you. Gscshoyru 14:27, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I agree with WP:NPOV. Adding the fact of the existance of prominent proponents of the claims made within the film, and then providing the necessary citations to demonstrate and prove that such people do exist, cannot in any rationale way be considered a "point of view". This is merely a statement of fact. However, Arthur Rubin's continual childish edit war and abuse of his status, in clear and constant violation of the 3RR, can only be considered an attempt to censor these facts and create an article with heavy bias that omits those details which he'd rather censor.  Knowledge Enabler 14:40, 13 September 2007 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|30px|]] You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Loose Change (2007 film). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors.  A little late, but at least now you should be aware of the policy.


 * I have not been near 3RR unless you include the addition of the dubious tag to material that I believe shouldn't be in the article and the deletion of a self-link. You, on the other hand....  &mdash; Arthur Rubin |  (talk) 19:23, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Entropia Universe. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. ''The reliable source in all the things you cited does not support the info in the paragraph. And the rest of the sources are not reliable. '' Gscshoyru 15:35, 13 September 2007 (UTC)