User talk:Knowwhatweknow

Welcome!

Hello, Knowwhatweknow, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Paravar have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Sitush (talk) 02:25, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Paravar
I am sorry but you really are doing all sorts of wrong things at Paravar and I have had to revert your contributions again. If you add new information then you need to ensure that it is verifiable by citing sources that are reliable. If you remove information that is already reliably sourced then you need to explain why in an edit summary and probably also on the article talk page. You also need to be careful not to use peacock or weasel words. Please can you read some of these blue-linked items. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 02:24, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh, and we are not censored here. Just because, for example, you might not care for the conclusions of Frykenburg - a reliable source - does not mean that you can remove them. There are occasional situations where that might be justified (usually because of the need to balance an article) but you would have to make your reasons clear on the talk page. - Sitush (talk) 02:30, 20 November 2012 (UTC)