User talk:Knulclunk/Archive 2

Gen X page
Please accept my apology if that's true. I checked the edit history and may have been mistaken as there have been quite a lot lately as you may be aware of. All I ask is that people use integrity and go by Wikipedia policy, yet people just do what they want. It gets frustrating. Ledboots (talk) 01:22, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Nuvola apps important.svg You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing.

Is there a reason you deleted the succession box, making what it appears to be more than three reverts in 24 hours, all without adding to the discussion in the talk page specifically pertaining to the succession box? I added to that section -- should you have wanted to revert it, it would be appreciated if you could contribute to that discussion. CaptainMorgan (talk) 03:08, 14 May 2009 (UTC)


 * I don't think I was in violation. I replied on the article talk page: --Knulclunk (talk) 03:49, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

You're invited!
In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, look at our approval by the Chapters Committee, develop ideas for chapter projects at museums and libraries throughout our region, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the November meeting's minutes and the December mini-meetup's minutes).

We'll make preparations for our exciting museum photography Wikipedia Loves Art! February bonanza (on Flickr, on Facebook) with Shelley from the Brooklyn Museum and Alex from the Metropolitan Museum of Art.

We'll also be collecting folks to join our little Wikipedia Takes the Subway adventure which will be held the day after the meeting.

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:21, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

NYC Meetup: You're invited!
Join us the evenings of Friday February 6 and Saturday February 7 around Wikipedia Loves Art! museum photography events at the Metropolitan Museum of Art and the Brooklyn Museum.

There will also be a special business meeting on Saturday dedicated to discussing Wikimedia New York City issues with guests from the Wikimedia Foundation.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list. This has been automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:32, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Barnstar
I do have to ask, are you really an inclusionist as the template tag on your user page states? I have met a hell of a lot of so called "inclusionists" who seem more intent on deleting/merging material than saving it...

A much more important question is:
 * Are there any other studies like this that you are aware of? 

BTW, you may be interested in joining Article Rescue Squadron

Thanks for your incredible contributions. Ikip (talk) 03:25, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
 * You pass my preliminary initial test for being an editor who supports inclusionism. Ikip (talk) 03:47, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Cloverfield pic
Hi

Yup - I asked him why he had changed it - User_talk:Guest9999

His reply - User_talk:Chaosdruid

I know some editors like to stick to rules and I didn't want to get into a war about that sort of thing as I don't know enough about how flexible we are on that matter lol

cheers--Chaosdruid (talk) 06:10, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Faux Painting edit
I really RESENT you editing out links to photos of my marbling work on the Faux Painting page. That was no more spamming than the FAUX LIKE A PRO entries, and the work is of extreme quality. I';m not after clients but felt it was reasonable to show a variety of high quality marbling.

I remember bacl 25 years ago, when decorative painters were a community. How petty and small-minded of you.

EditEx AKA Dario - dario1.com  —Preceding unsigned comment added by EditEx (talk • contribs) 04:09, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Norma Kamali
Hiya - was just adding Norma Kamali to the list of important American sportswear (fashion) designers and thought to look her up, and was flabbergasted she wasn't on here. Anyway, I thought I'd just pop in and say hello as I saw her bio in your sandbox when I Googled. Anyway, just wanted to say that I look forward to seeing it once it's tidied up and made available again. Best, Mabalu (talk) 11:20, 20 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Yes, I'd be happy to take the Kamali Wiki on and sort it out when I have a second. There's plenty to work with, so that's good. Mabalu (talk) 14:13, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Baby Boomers
That change completely doesn't work for me. I'll write something up this weekend and see if it works for you.TreadingWater (talk) 04:09, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Great! I beg you, PLEASE keep your discussion concise and avoid calling editors who disagree with you agenda driven... you'll get a better response!--Knulclunk (talk) 04:16, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

You're invited!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:28, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Jonathan Pontell
I think Jonathan Pontell, the television producer and Jonathan Pontell the Generation Jones guy are two different people.... Do you have a source saying otherwise? --Knulclunk (talk) 21:24, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
 * This is classic. I wasn't even drunk like i am now, go figure. No source what so ever. I stumbled onto generation jones which linked to the tv guy. Anyways, feel free to tag, revert, nuke, whatever. Once I sober up, hopefully I can fix it :) Cheers (literally), Tom 21:27, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

lol! Drinking and editing is always a bad (fun) mix. --Knulclunk (talk) 21:31, 21 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the rewrite of the Pontell articlel. Do you have an opinion of the Generation Jones article that brought me to the Pontell article. He isn't the same guy, corret? Also, I just saw your message, we are posting at the same time. Also, I am sober now :). Thanks again :) Tom 03:40, 22 March 2009 (UTC)ps Harlem? I lived in Forest Hills for 5 years and worked at Columbia for awhile. Everybody should have to live in NYC for a few years :) Tom 03:44, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
SchuminWeb (Talk) 13:28, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Crack City discussion
Hi -- You raise an interesting question about the list of places, in addition to Washington Heights, that were denigrated with the epithet "crack city" in the 1990s.

The reason I added the list was to point out that Washington Heights wasn't the only spot in Manhattan that had been given that name. I expanded the list so that readers can learn that plenty of other places -- Long Island, New Jersey, California, even England -- had crack problems too.

Here's another example. If someone posted that the 1 train is terrible because it's crowded at rush hour and on weekends and you can't understand the announcements half the time, it wouldn't be wrong, but it would be a selective fact because *all* subway trains are crowded at rush hour and many of them have poor p.a. systems. Fleshing out the facts makes it clear to those who don't ride NYC subways that the problem is widespread -- not limited to any one train line. And it keeps you from incorrectly thinking that the 1 train is worse than others in this regard.

Likewise, saying that Washington Heights was Crack City in the 1990s is true, but so were many other places. To limit the readers' information is unfair not only to the readers (they should be able to see all relevant facts), but also to the subject of the article (Washington Heights, in this case).

Adding information, not reducing it, makes WP valuable. The crime wave of the 1990s was a national phenomenon; it wasn't limited to one neighborhood in Upper Manhattan. Why prevent readers from finding out? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nbaz34 (talk • contribs) 17:10, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

GenJones "consortium"
Apologies for the delay in responding.

I don't think there is a Gen Jones consortium. I think that there's one guy using sock puppets trying to use Wikipedia to pursue his own personal interests. Regardless, my experience with him/them was nothing short of harassment.

Sock puppeting of GenJones does does not appear to be limited to Wikipedia; to pull just one of a number of links, here's a guy on HuffingtonPost who never posts anything unless it's related to GenJones:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/users/profile/JamesRandolph?action=comments

Therefore, I'm opposed to any mention of Gen Jones in any of the post-WWII generational pages that gives credibility to this as an academic term.

I would go so far as to only keep a GenJones page if it includes an analysis of whether sock puppets have been used historically, as well as discussion about the relative lack of use of the GenJones term in the 2008 Presidential election, where one would have expected it to be used frequently if the concept had standing in the wider community.

RollandWaters (talk) 22:15, 29 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi there, sorry about my delay as well, I somehow missed your note on my talk page. I'm not super involved or even that interested in the subject of Generation Jones, at least not enough to get in ugly edit wars with people as I almost did, but if you want some input from a somewhat detached observer please let me know.  TastyCakes (talk) 17:13, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

You're invited...
In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, establish a membership process for the chapter, review the upcoming Wiki-Conference New York 2009 (planned for ~100 people at NYU this summer) and future projects like Wikipedia at the Library, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the March meeting's minutes).

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:06, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Single Ladies
The new image is much better. Thanx! --Knulclunk (talk) 04:17, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. They were about to delete the previous image because it contributed nothing to the article. Hopefully this one stays put. Oran e   (talk)  20:48, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Slparoividbk.jpg
Kindly note that "this image has a rationale" and "this image has a fully valid rationale and meets all the WP:NFCC" are distinct concepts. I am nominating this image for FFD. Stifle (talk) 09:47, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Generation Jones
An article that you have been involved in editing, Generation Jones, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. A. Yager (talk) 14:16, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Generation Jones
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Generation Jones. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Generation Jones (3rd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:20, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Yellowrose02.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading File:Yellowrose02.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 03:53, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Fujikawa BabyAnimals.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fujikawa BabyAnimals.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. ww2censor (talk) 14:02, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Yellowrose02.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Yellowrose02.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. ww2censor (talk) 14:42, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

New stamp upload
I have uploaded the Japan Treaty stamp as File:Stamp US 1960 JapanTreaty100th.jpg so you can use it instead of the disputed one. Cheers ww2censor (talk) 03:21, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
–Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:38, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

User:Knulclunk/Norma Kamali
I would like to get an article about Norma Kamali back into the mainspace. Do you mind if I work on this subpage and then move it into the mainspace when it is ready? --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:03, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Not at all! This was an older page that was removed as "promotional", so be sure to modify the language enough to be more encyclopedic. Cheers.--Knulclunk (talk) 14:32, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
SchuminWeb (Talk) 10:36, 28 August 2009 (UTC)


 * And again. SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:28, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

You're invited...
In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, review the recent Wiki-Conference New York, plan for the next stages of projects like Wikipedia Takes Manhattan and Wikipedia at the Library, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the May meeting's minutes).

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:42, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Reply
I reply to you here because I am finding it difficult to place comments on the conversion therapy talk page.

Your comments regarding criticism of ex-gay treatment are not very clear. Could you please explain exactly what you meant by saying that "The problem with the criticism that was being used focused on the impropriety of a small group"? The fact that "Examples of impropriety are universal" is irrelevant. If there is a risk of sexual exploitation or abuse in other kinds of therapy, then articles about those kinds of therapy should have information to that effect. There is no justification for removing these facts from the conversion therapy article - however inconvenient and embarrassing some may find them. With regard to your comment, "It is appropriate to explain that supporters of ex-gay ministry usually do not define there mission as "conversion therapy" from homosexual to heterosexual", I reply that the article is concerned with ex-gay ministry only as form of conversion therapy. Born Gay (talk) 23:24, 11 September 2009 (UTC)


 * When the criticism you choose to add uses the term "suspect testimonials", many readers will interpret the edit as POV or the source as dubious WP:RS. I see that you have improved the language by including Halderman's name, but it would be nice to know who this guy is and why we should trust his intemperate opinion. I also took issue with the conclusion "...data were unconvincing, founded on a poorly described treatment program that used ill-defined constructs." This is a conclusion that could be deduced from any reader, so to tack it onto the end of the paragraph seemed unnecessary and agenda pushing. Your new edit acknowledging Halderman is better, but I still don't know why I should trust him any more that any other motivated activist.
 * Your original source, Gonsiorek and Weinrich, seem to have a history of publishing titles about gays and public policy, like Sexual Landscapes: Why We Are What We Are, Why We Love Whom We Love. This is not necessarily a problem, but their stance should be noted in article copy and their essay should not be the only opinion allowed into the article.


 * Just because the Yarhouse study rejects the term "conversion therapy", does not mean it is not the same thing as defined by this article. In the past few days, many editors have noted the vague terms "conversion therapy", "reparative therapy" and "ex-gay" and how they are used differently by different organizations depending on the agenda. If ex-gay ministry has an accepted definition that extends outside conversion therapy, we cannot have a paragraph as limited as you suggest. It is lying. Activist editors some time ago equated reparative therapy with conversion therapy. Just follow the link and see for yourself. As long as WP links the two, our sources should as well. I support separating a reparative therapy section as I think there are some distinct differences, notably patient willingness and the lack of any pharmaceutical or physical component.


 * I admit, I don't follow your objection to the inclusion of Yardhouse. The Yardhouse study isn't really a big "win" for ex-gay supporters. If you think about the subset... a group of very motivated, religious homosexuals with a rate of 15% conversion to a "complicated" heterosexuality... well, that's a pretty slim "success" rate.


 * This may surprise you, but I'm not some huge supporter of conversion therapy or ex-gay ministry. What I am a supporter of is a useful, intelligent Wikipedia unencumbered by agenda and ideology. Sadly, there is a very strong, very motivated minority of editors who want to define certain articles and topics, claiming that their worldview is the "right" worldview. If I incorrectly assumed you among their number, I apologize. But then I would encourage you see the excellent essay Writing for the opponent and the classic Assume good faith.--Knulclunk (talk) 02:56, 12 September 2009 (UTC)


 * "Suspect testimonials" is what Haldeman says. I don't think anyone can be held accountable for how readers might interpret the article; some people might interpret anything in any fashion. I have no problem with identifying who Haldeman is or what his qualifications are, if that is done in a neutral way. Including his conclusion is necessary if we are going to represent his views in an accurate way; again, I wouldn't place any confidence in what "any" reader would conclude. The "ill-defined constructs" part could not necessarily be deduced from the rest of the paragraph. Who you choose to trust is entirely your affair, but we can't ignore a reliable source because we may not like or agree with its author. You admit that the Yarhouse study says it is not about conversion therapy, but imply that it is the "same thing as defined by this article." The article does not define conversion therapy at all; it presents the multiple definitions that exist in reliable sources. I simply don't understand what you mean by saying that "If ex-gay ministry has an accepted definition that extends outside conversion therapy, we cannot have a paragraph as limited as you suggest." Ex-gay ministries are only relevant in an article on conversion therapy to the extent that sources regard them as conversion therapy, as Haldeman does, but Yarhouse does not. BG 06:34, 12 September 2009 (UTC)


 * I agree with you that turning reparative therapy into a separate article from conversion therapy, rather than simply a redirect to it, would be a good idea, but it would be difficult to do that, and I don't regard it as a high priority. We need to get disputes over the conversion therapy article sorted out before addressing reparative therapy as a separate article. BG 06:37, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Wikis Take Manhattan
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:17, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

You're invited!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:32, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Graffiti Term Grafflage Valid
I have heard the term grafflage in use in East Asia where graffiti art has been gaining more acceptance and visibility in recent years. I will reinsert the entries. If you wish further discussion, please contact me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ChandosChan (talk • contribs) 11:50, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

File:PanScan7BridesPan.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:PanScan7BridesPan.gif, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. J Milburn (talk) 11:56, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Content squeeze.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Content squeeze.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 12:02, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia Day NYC
You are invited to celebrate Wikipedia Day and the 9th anniversary (!) of the founding of the site at Wikipedia Day NYC on Sunday January 24, 2010 at New York University; sign up for Wikipedia Day NYC here. Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends! This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:55, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Uploading a File
Hello! How are you? I wonder if you can make uploading a file, therefore the Wikipedia stop me, because the laws of my country do not allow Fair Use

Can you help me?

Thank you! --DeivsonPrescovia (talk) 13:23, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * What file do you need uploaded? --Knulclunk (talk) 02:49, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

NYC Wikipedia Meetup Sunday, March 21
In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, review the recent Wikipedia Day NYC, plan for the next stages of projects like Wikipedia at the Library and Lights Camera Wiki, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects, for example User:ScienceApologist will present on "climate change, alternative medicine, UFOs and Transcendental Meditation" (see the November meeting's minutes).

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back. And if the weather is good, we'll have a star party with the telescopes on the roof of Pupin Hall!

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 15:25, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

List of events named massacres
Hi, you are named on the talk page as actively involved with this article: RfC please here []. Regards, Springnuts (talk) 12:40, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

NYC Wikipedia Meetup Saturday, May 22
In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, review the recent Wikimedia Chapters Meeting 2010, plan for the next stages of projects like Wiki-Conference NYC and Wikipedia Cultural Embassy, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the March meeting's minutes).

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:08, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Black jacks gum2.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Black jacks gum2.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:07, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

mary boone info
how/where did you find "mary boone and the contemporary art market"? i think the author should be referenced, no? or if possible a link to wherever you found the paper. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.254.121.124 (talk) 14:39, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Wiki-Conference NYC (2nd annual)
Our 2nd annual Wiki-Conference NYC has been confirmed for the weekend of August 28-29 at New York University.

There's still plenty of time to join a panel, or to propose a lightning talk or an open space session. Register for the Wiki-Conference here. And sign up here for on-wiki notification. All are invited! This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 15:25, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia NYC Meetup Sat Oct 16
In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, review the recent Wiki-Conference NYC 2010, plan for the next stages of projects like Wikipedia Ambassador Program and Wikipedia Academy, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the May meeting's minutes).

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 16:10, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Eskimo pie box.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Eskimo pie box.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:14, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

NYC Meetup: Saturday, December 4
Our next Wikipedia NYC Meetup is this weekend on Saturday Dec 4 at Brooklyn Museum during their awesome First Saturdays program, starting at 5 PM.

A particular highlight for the wiki crowd will be 'Seductive Subversion: Women Pop Artists, 1958–1968', and the accompanying "WikiPop" project, with specially-created Wikipedia articles on the artists displayed on iPads in the gallery.

This will be a museum touring and partying meetup, so no excuses about being a shy newbie this time. Bring a friend too!

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:23, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Pittsburgh event for Wikipedia's tenth anniversary
Hi! Since you have a connection to Pittsburgh, I wanted to invite you to the Wikipedia Tenth Anniversary celebrations we're having in Pittsburgh on Saturday, January 15. During the daytime, we're going to be having a photo contribution drive where anyone can bring in their digital photos or prints and Wikipedians will teach people how to upload them and add them to articles, and maybe introduction to Wikipedia workshops as well. Then in the evening, we'll have fun at the Carson City Saloon. There will be free Wikipedia t-shirts and other goodies, as well. See the Pittsburgh meetup page for more details. I hope to see you there!--ragesoss (talk) 15:54, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Dean Cain and Teri Hatcher at 45th Emmy Awards02.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Dean Cain and Teri Hatcher at 45th Emmy Awards02.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:06, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Massacre
As you are listed in the box at the start of Talk:List of events named massacres this is a heads up to let you know that I have listed Massacre for an AfD See Articles for deletion/Massacre -- PBS (talk) 08:03, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Fair-use rationales
Stopping by as a saw you attempt to save a file from deletion by adding a FUR. Just a heads up, but when a fair-use rationale is given, it is best to use the Non-free use rationale template as can be seen now at File:Slboard10.gif. This gives all the needed parameters to stay compliant (as long as the given rational is seen as justified). Sometimes looking at similar images types can help determine what wording is appropriate. Kindly Calmer   Waters  19:41, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

You're invited to the New York Wiknic!


This message is being sent to inform you of a Wikipedia picnic that is being held in your area next Saturday, June 25. From 1 to 8 PM or any time in between, join your fellow volunteers for a get together at Norman's Landscape ( directions ) in Manhattan's Central Park.

Take along your friends (newbies permitted), your family and other free culture enthusiasts! You may also want to pack a blanket, some water or perhaps even a frisbee.

If you can, share what you're bringing at the discussion page.

Also, please remember that this is the picnic that anyone can edit so bring enough food to share!

To subscribe to future events, follow the mailing list or add your username to the invitation list. BrownBot (talk) 19:11, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Teaching with Wikipedia Workshop at CMU (Aug 15)
Since you are one of the editors in the Category:Wikipedians by alma mater: Carnegie Mellon University, I'd like to invite you to the Teaching with Wikipedia Workshop that will take place at CMU on Aug 15 (this workshop is open to general public, and is a joint imitative of CMU and Pitt). There will be another workshop held at Pitt in the Fall as well. It will cover how to include Wikipedia in one's course (WP:SUP) and also how to become a Campus Ambassadors. Pennsylvania has currently only one ambassador (myself) and it would be great if we could recruit at least several more. Ambassadors help course instructors, showing them how Wikipedia works, and interact with students. Many current ambassadors come from the body of students, faculty and university staff; it is a fun adventure, and adds to one resume/CV, to boot :) If it sounds interesting, feel free to ask me any questions, or to come to the workshop.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; talk 20:14, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:The Musical in NYC Oct 22
You are invited to Wikipedia:The Musical in NYC, an editathon, Wikipedia meet-up and lectures that will be held on Saturday, October 22, 2011, at the New York Public Library for the Performing Arts (at Lincoln Center), as part of the Wikipedia Loves Libraries events being held across the USA.

All are welcome, sign up on the wiki and here !--Pharos (talk) 04:34, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Morningside Avenue (Manhattan)
Hello, Knulclunk, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you worked on, Morningside Avenue (Manhattan), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

It helps to explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the Help Desk. Thanks again for contributing!  ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ  τ ¢  23:37, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Morningside Avenue (Manhattan) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Morningside Avenue (Manhattan) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Morningside Avenue (Manhattan) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ  τ ¢  16:32, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

You're invited to Wiki-Gangs of New York @ NYPL on April 21!
where did you find that paper on mary boone?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Getattahere (talk • contribs) 19:27, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

mary boone
where did you find the paper on mary boone?


 * All my sources are at the bottom of the page, in the reference section. Which one do you mean?
 * --Knulclunk (talk) 20:07, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

I mean my senior thesis. my poorly written, pain in the ass senior thesis that you've somehow cut and pasted bits of into wikipedia. all YOUR sources at the bottom of the page are all MY sources from MY bibliography. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Getattahere (talk • contribs) 21:04, 16 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Lol. I wrote most of it. I'm sorry if you think its poorly written. I hope you did well on your thesis. Since I copied and pasted nothing, I think you should recheck your sources.   :)
 * --Knulclunk (talk) 14:22, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Knulclunk/massacre
User:Knulclunk/massacre, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Knulclunk/massacre and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Knulclunk/massacre during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 05:41, 5 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Burn it --Knulclunk (talk) 22:33, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Skydiver (ride)


The article Skydiver (ride) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not notable. Poorly sourced, permanent stub.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sum mer PhD (talk) 02:01, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia Goes to the Movies in NYC this Saturday Dec 1
You are invited to Wikipedia Goes to the Movies in NYC, an editathon, Wikipedia meet-up and workshops focused on film and the performing arts that will be held on Saturday, December 1, 2012, at the New York Public Library for the Performing Arts (at Lincoln Center), as part of the Wikipedia Loves Libraries events being held across the USA.

All are welcome, sign up on the wiki and at meetup.com!--Pharos (talk) 07:23, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Cloverfeildcloseup.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Cloverfeildcloseup.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:00, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia Day Celebration and Mini-Conference in NYC Saturday Feb 23
You are invited to celebrate Wikipedia Day and the 12th anniversary (!) of the founding of the site at Wikipedia Day NYC on Saturday February 23, 2013 at New York University; sign up for Wikipedia Day NYC here, or at bit.ly/wikidaynyu. Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues!

We especially encourage folks to add your 5-minute lightning talks to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience!--Pharos (talk) 02:27, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:CM polar express.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:CM polar express.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:10, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Eskimo Pie question
I notice that you did a couple of revisions on the Eskimo Pie article. I'm wondering about something, and I'm not sure how to raise the issue. The article states, "In 1921, he filed for a patent, and secured an agreement with local chocolate producer Russell C. Stover to mass-produce them under the new trademarked name "Eskimo Pie" (a name suggested by Mrs. Stover." I question whether or not the name was suggested by Mrs. Stover. My curiosity was aroused because the reason I looked up the article was to decide whether or not to trash a 40-year old handout about the origin of the name that a local ice cream company (a wholesaler) used to give away to retailers who sold the product. (No, there is no attribution in the handout.) That article states, "After several months of selling the product in the Iowa area, they decided the ice cream bar should have a more appealing name. One evening after dining with some friends, Mr. Nelson and his partner took the dictionary from the shelf and began to list all the words that were applicable to "cold". Some of the listings were frigid, frozen, chilly, zero, eskimo[sic], igloo, and snowman. After much deliberation everyone felt the word "ESKIMO" was the most appropriate and defined coldness."

There do exist numerous references to the name being suggested by Russell Stover's wife, Clara, but there is a 1922 book available free via Google ebooks, which is an interview with the advertising manager of Russell Stover, J.E. Finneran, at http://books.google.com/books?id=s0UjAQAAMAAJ&pg=RA3-PA12&lpg=RA3-PA12&dq=name+eskimo+pie+nelson+and+friends&source=bl&ots=D28cLSWoXX&sig=x94GAD4G-gCaX3ri5vxoThjUqVU&hl=en&sa=X&ei=cU_-UKnwKMTC2QW9zoGQCg&ved=0CDkQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=name%20eskimo%20pie%20nelson%20and%20friends&f=false, and he makes no mention of Mrs. Stover: "The name "Eskimo Pie" was coined by Mr. Stover himself, but before he settled upon this name as final, he had five hundred or more names submitted by friends and various interested parties, that he might consider them."

I find it unlikely that the sales manager of Stover's company would fail to mention that Mrs. Stover had originated the name if she had done so. The article at http://amhistory.si.edu/archives/d8553.htm states only, "It was decided the name would change from Nelson's "I-Scream Bar" to "Eskimo Pie"" [in 1921]. That exact sentence appears in other places as well. Funding Universe, in its history of the Eskimo Pie Corporation, states only, "Stover has been credited with changing the name of the novelty to the now-famous Eskimo Pie." (http://www.fundinguniverse.com/company-histories/eskimo-pie-corporation-history/).

Do you have any references that would clarify the origin of the name? — Preceding unsigned comment added by GeorgeButel (talk • contribs) 09:25, 22 January 2013 (UTC)


 * I am uncertain about where the source for Mrs. Stover originated. If you don't see it in the attached references, you can mark it citation needed. If you have sources for a different origin of the name, you should put them in the article. If someone fails to provide a citation for Mrs. Stover creating the name and you have checked the articles references, feel free to remove it.  Knulclunk (talk) 16:50, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia Meetup NYC this Sunday April 14
Hi Knulclunk! You're invited to our next meeting for Wikipedia Meetup NYC on Sunday April 14 -this weekend- at Symposium Greek Restaurant @ 544 W 113th St (in the back room), on the Upper West Side in the Columbia University area.

Please sign up, and add your ideas to the agenda for Sunday. Thanks!

Delivered on behalf of User:Pharos, 18:18, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Let the facts speak for themselves
FYI: I have just created an essay called Let the facts speak for themselves. Thanks to your user page it was easy for me to find the dates for the wording in WP:NPOV -- PBS (talk) 11:41, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Feudal
You might be interested to see recent improvements to Feudal (game), the 3M bookshelf game. I know your comment on the talk page was left a long time ago, but better late than never, right? Cheers! Wilhelm Meis (&#9742; Diskuss &#124; &#x270D; Beiträge) 05:24, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Wikimedia NYC Meetup- "Greenwich Village In The 60s" Editathon! Saturday November 2
{| style="background-color: #E0FFFF; border: 1px solid #0000FF;"
 * style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | Jefferson market crop.jpg
 * style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Please join Wikipedia "Greenwich Village In The 60s" Editathon on November 2, 2013! Everyone gather at Jefferson Market Library to further Wikipedia's local outreachfor Greenwich Village articles on the history and the community.--Pharos (talk) 22:05, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link fixing one-day contest
I have decided to put on a mini-contest within the November 2013 monthly disambiguation contest, on Saturday, November 23 (UTC). I will personally give a $20 Amazon.com gift card to the disambiguator who fixes the most links on that server-day (see the project page for details on scoring points). Since we are not geared up to do an automated count for that day, at 00:00, 23 November 2013 (UTC) (which is 7:00 PM on November 22, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the project page leaderboard. I will presume that anyone who is not already listed on the leaderboard has precisely nine edits. At 01:00, 24 November 2013 (UTC) (8:00 PM on November 23, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the leaderboard at that time (the extra hour is to give the board time to update), and I will determine from that who our winner is. I will credit links fixed by turning a WP:DABCONCEPT page into an article, but you'll have to let me know me that you did so. Here's to a fun contest. Note that according to the Daily Disambig, we currently have under 256,000 disambiguation links to be fixed. If everyone in the disambiguation link fixers category were to fix 500 links, we would have them all done - so aim high! Cheers! bd2412 T 02:48, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Cloverfeildcloseup.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Cloverfeildcloseup.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 20:03, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:Blockheadgame.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:40, 11 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:Content squeeze.png, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:10, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Sunday July 6: WikNYC Picnic
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by removing your name from this list.)

Sunday August 17: NYC Wiki-Salon and Skill Share
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by removing your name from this list.)

Orphaned non-free image File:CM girl loved horses.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:CM girl loved horses.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:44, 10 November 2014 (UTC)


 * done--Knulclunk (talk) 12:06, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Thursday December 4: NYC Wiki-Salon and Skill Share
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by removing your name from this list.)

Saturday February 7 in NYC: Black Life Matters Editathon
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Sunday March 22: Wikipedia Day NYC Celebration and Mini-Conference
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

April 29: WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

June 10: WikiWednesday Salon / Wikimedia NYC Annual Meeting
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

As the primary contributor to List of events named massacres, would you care to weigh in?
I've started a discussion on talkpage about a recent massive ip insertion of events not commonly named massacres to the list. Do you have an opinion one way or the other? BusterD (talk) 21:15, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Still 1957 D1.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Still 1957 D1.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:19, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Blockheadgame.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Blockheadgame.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 09:10, 6 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Rationale and source provided in the description

Abraham Lincoln by d'Aulaire
Hi Knulclunk,

I'm Josh and I'm a partner at Beautiful Feet Books, a children's book publisher. We publish many titles by Ingri and Edgar Parin d'Aulaire and I saw that you contributed to the page of their book Abraham Lincoln. We have published this book since the early 2000s and recently released a new edition in 2015. You can see the book on our website here: http://bfbooks.com/Abraham-Lincoln-dAulaire-PB. I have tried to update the Wiki page for this title but I do not know how to update the picture of the cover. The picture featured now is the original, poor quality photo and would love to get the new cover up there along with some new and updated information. Are you able to do that or could you point me in the proper direction?

I very much appreciate your time.

97.86.129.73 (talk) 22:28, 27 March 2017 (UTC) Best, Josh Berg josh@bfbooks.com
 * I'll be happy to take a look at the new imagery and check out the updated book information.Knulclunk (talk) 01:44, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Cool grey.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cool grey.png, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:04, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Cityscape I 360.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cityscape I 360.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. ATTENTION : This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Cityscape I 360.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cityscape I 360.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. ATTENTION : This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Cityscape I 360.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cityscape I 360.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. ATTENTION : This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 27 July 2018 (UTC)