User talk:Knutonfire

August 2011
Your addition to Michael Aronov has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Beloved Freak  13:32, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Additionally, please take some time to look over some of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, such as Neutral point of view and Biographies of living persons. Thankyou, -- Beloved Freak  13:38, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Michael Aronov. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Beloved Freak  16:46, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

__________

Hello Yunshui - I understand the concern. None of the updates made by me have been false, or libelous, or an infringement of copyright. The actor consistently has the wrong dates published for this birth year and month. I always update it with the correct information. We have documents and proof of his legitimate birth date. This is why there were efforts to change the false information on the Italian and Afrikaans version for Michael Aronov. All the updates that are made on his behalf are certainly not biased, but accurate and valid. We receive authentic information about any new works or notable life and professional endeavors the actor makes before anyone else. There is no hyperbole in the additions. These are facts and cross-referenced. Please feel free to let me know what else I can do to validate these contributions. Thank you, Knutonfire

Michael Aronov
I have reverted your edits to the Michael Aronov article as they removed categories. Could you please follow conventions when editing. --Racklever (talk) 20:31, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Hello @Racklever:

We represent the actual person and actor, Michael Aronov. The information that we have added is all authentic, factual, and updated information. The Italian and Africaans version has false and libelous information - ie. date of birth, month, day, parent's names and place of birth. We have updated to keep the facts for this person, authentic and true. I understand keeping this site and work legit, that is what we were making great efforts to do. Please eliminate the "block" and help us to contribute our most authentic and updated version of information to Michael Aronov.

Respectfully, Knutonfire

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for undisclosed paid editing for the purpose of promoting your client. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Yunshui 雲 水 15:08, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi, how is "represent"ing someone without a conflict of interest possible? ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:05, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi, When I say represent, I'm not meaning as a lawyer or agent, but more as someone who actually knows the history and information on the subject being written about. In the way any editor may feel they represent a person they write about or contribute information for. When they do, they, in turn, keep the subject from being falsely written about. There's a fine line when any random person can contribute what they want solely because they may have read it on another site. Sometimes the info is legit and valuable. Sometimes it is not. This is where I feel I "represent" a person who has no say in the matter of what may be written about them. It was the wrong word. My apologies. It's semantics and I would have used a different word if I knew it would be interpreted as working for someone or having a conflict of interest. The trouble or fear being any random person who has no real knowledge of a celebrity or public figure being able to add what they want, when they want. An example is the birth dates the other two pages have for Michael Aronov in Italian and Africaans. It's false and can be harmful to people reading about this artist assuming info that isn't true. Like being 14 years older than he actually is, and born in a different month and city with the wrong parents' names. Without some knowledge of the person there is no true representation, just a regurgitation of other sites or mere assumptions. Knutonfire (talk)


 * Thank you very much for the detailed explanation; this term might have played a significant role in the block decision, and may be a misunderstanding. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:32, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for saying that. I think you're right. Hopefully they read the above and understand, eventually helping me in getting better at any contributions I may have from here onward. Knutonfire (talk)
 * It may be worth noting in reviewing the block that an individual claiming to be Michael Aranov (it's a gmail address so there is no guarantee that it is really him, but I can't see any obvious reason for it to be fake) has specifically requested via OTRS that his representative User:Knutonfire be granted permission to be "the main updater for the page". I therefore suspect that we are not being told the whole truth here. Yunshui 雲 水  11:22, 3 December 2019 (UTC)