User talk:Knuxstar

Speedy deletion nomination of The dragontome series
Hello Knuxstar,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The dragontome series for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Schetm (talk) 15:36, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The dragontome series


The article The dragontome series has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:NBOOK, no secondary sources for this not-yet-published book.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. McGeddon (talk) 17:03, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Writing an article about your own books
Hello, Knuxstar. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article The dragontome series, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.--McGeddon (talk) 17:07, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia contradicts itself
Wikipedia claims its a site where anyone may post delete or edit articles but then they come up with a rule that makes no sense since Wikipedia staff creates articles to help people set up articles they have made their own conflict of interest. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Knuxstar (talk • contribs)


 * Wikipedia is absolutely entitled to set up its own rules about what articles may or may not be created. "Anybody may edit" is not the same thing as "Anybody may write about anything." —C.Fred (talk) 17:20, 6 March 2015 (UTC)


 * People just have to be careful when writing encyclopedia entries about themselves, their friends, or their own projects, because it's hard to be impartial. It's always better if someone else writes it. (The rule is just for articles about stuff, not about Wikipedia policies, which have a whole different set of rules for how to change them.) --McGeddon (talk) 17:20, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

No reason to doubt
Frankly I wanted to do the page for this and i don't see why this is such a big deal. Authors, directors, Even people you do articles on should be able to edit whats there about them as well as construct their own data. This may be an encyclopedia its a gateway of knowledge. It feels like it becomes a conflict of interest when this kind of thing happens and some of you guys decide things are not worthy of Wikipedia knowledge hub. Frankly there is a lot of the time I check Wikipedia frequently for new warrior cats books.
 * We've got rules that allow directors and authors to edit their own pages if they're fixing a mistake, and anything more than that has to go through the article talk page first, so that somebody else can check it over. In practice it means that articles just get written by fans instead.
 * There's a clear line for what gets into Wikipedia and what doesn't, and that line is pretty much "has it been in the news or won an award". It means that Wikipedia doesn't cover everything, but Wikipedia isn't trying to cover everything - that's what the rest of the internet is for. --McGeddon (talk) 17:44, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:43, 6 March 2015 (UTC)