User talk:Koblet

I agree to the edit counter opt-in terms

Speedy deletion nomination of Genney


A tag has been placed on Genney requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Winged Blades Godric 15:19, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Genney moved to your user space
I moved the Genney page into your user space. It is now here: User:Koblet/Genney.

This will give you more time to work on the article. Posting an article before it is finished will make it very likely to get deleted. In this case you absolutely must have independent sources discussing the topic. Having only references to the program's own site is not enough. Has Genney, for instance, been reviewed in some genealogical publication? That would be the kind of source that could save the article from the threat of deletion.

Take your time and move it back to article space only when you feel that the sourcing is sufficient. --Hegvald (talk) 20:31, 17 February 2017 (UTC)