User talk:Kocisz2001

Welcome!
Hello, Kocisz2001, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Indigo Productions, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:29, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Indigo Productions


A tag has been placed on Draft:Indigo Productions requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://wikiproductinfo.blogspot.com/2018/06/indigo-productions.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:29, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

The copyright violation was commited by the the website listed above (https://wikiproductinfo.blogspot.com/2018/06/indigo-productions.html) I was the person who wrote this text in the first place. Unfortunately, the page was already deleted when I tried to contest the deletion. Should I recreate it again using the text that was "allegedly" plagiarized by me or to avoid the scusation itself should I write new content from scratch? Kocisz2001 (talk) 17:53, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
 * We cannot accept material that has been previously published elsewhere online without the copyright holder's written permission and release under a compatible license. Wikipedia has procedures in place for this purpose. Please see WP:Donating copyrighted materials for an explanation of how to do it. There's a sample permission email at WP:Consent. Alternatively you could re-write the material from scratch if you prefer. Hover the draft is not likely to be accepted for publication, because the organization does not appear to meet our notability requirements. Please see Notability (organizations and companies) for details. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:01, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much for your help ! I will write new content to avoid any misunderstanding related to copyright. As far as notability requirement, I read Notability (organizations and companies) as you suggested and I believe there is enough coverage to justify the article but I will first compile a list and test each for being a significant, independent, and reliable coverage - the list is long and involves segments(specifically about the company) in TV ( NN, NBC, MSNBC, Access Hollywood) in newspapers (Chicago Tribune, The Huffington Post, The Sydney Morning Herald, et al), and online (Yahoo, CNN, AOL, MSNBC, o2.pl, et al).Kocisz2001 (talk) 18:49, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

P.S., if I may ask you a different question - I want to edit an article in Polish wikipedia about Jan Piwnik - a historical figure from WW2 - a national hereo in Poland. The portion about his death is contrary to evidance I collected personally. I'm distatnly related to that person, so I had a chance to interview his brother who was present at the time of death. The wiki article claims he died whil assaulting german positions but his brother told me it was after the enemy's positions were overrun. According to my interview with his brother (who is unfortunatelly now deceased) Jan Piwnik died after the nazi positions were secured; he was walking the perimeter and conducting an inspection, when a german who was playing dead opened fire from his machine gun, killing Jan Piwnik on the spot. Since it was an interview conducted by myself I do not know how to cite it or even if I'm allowed to use it at all, since it's seemingly "original research or even hearsay" but being a part of a life story of such an important historical figure, I feel like it should be shared. I asked this question some time ago on the Polish discussion page but nobody responded. Any thoughts? Kocisz2001 (talk) 18:49, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
 * The rule on the English Wikipedia is information you obtain yourself via interviews is not considered a reliable source and could be construed as original research. So not acceptable as source material for this wiki. Polish Wikipedia likely has a similar rule. It looks like their relevant policy page is here. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:52, 22 March 2019 (UTC)