User talk:Kohli.nid

Speedy deletion nomination of FutureMarketer


A tag has been placed on FutureMarketer, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. KH-1 (talk) 05:53, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Reply
Hi, thanks for message. I deleted your article because
 * it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the company, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company claims or interviewing its management. You had no relevant references
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.
 * there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections. that's particularly the case when they are spamlinks to your company and its products and bossed
 * Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: has led large digital marketing agencies, helped clients reinvent marketing practices and operating models, built global brands, and pioneered startups... training to more than 5,000 professionals around the world... created successful marketing agencies, trained more than 3,000 executives on digital marketing and been at the forefront of search marketing and analytics in Asia... Singapore’s first Google Certified Advertising and Analytics professional.&mdash; just a selection, much more promotion in the text
 * links to the companies social media are not permitted


 * it's all about what the company sells, little about the company itself other than its location. To show notability you need hard verifiable facts such as the number of employees, turnover or profits.
 * The article may have been a copyright violation. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient. I was unable to check because my software warned me that your company page is an attack site
 * Your edits indicate that you have an obvious conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about this subject. If you work directly or indirectly for the company, or are otherwise editing on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, if you are paid directly or indirectly by the company you are writing about, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:    . If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message.

Citations & external links
Hi, I made some edits to your article FutureMarketer to remove inappropriate external links & convert some allowable links in to references. Please see WP:CITE and WP:EXT for some guidelines on this. I note this article has been previously deleted, it's still awfully promotional (the whole "Training and Consulting Services" section could probably go) and it could really use more references to establish notability. If an editor or admin comes along & deletes it again, you might want to consider using the Articles for creation process to make another article, that allows you to complete the article & have it reviewed prior to posting it. Thanks! JamesG5 (talk) 07:00, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of FutureMarketer for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article FutureMarketer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/FutureMarketer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lemongirl942 (talk) 09:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Kohli.nid. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article FutureMarketer, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
 * instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Lemongirl942 (talk) 09:31, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Discussion about COI
Hi Kohli.nid. I work on conflict of interest issues on Wikipedia. You editing suggests that you may be affiliated to "FutureMarketer". Per our COI guidelines, it would be best if you disclose any affiliation to "FutureMarketer". Please also let us know if you have been paid to edit this article. You can respond here. Thank you. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 09:34, 16 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Hi. I see that you have recreated the article again. It has been tagged for speedy deletion. It would be helpful if you could disclose your relationship to "FutureMarketer" if any. Thank you. You can reply here. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 05:55, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about FutureMarketer
Hello, Kohli.nid,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether FutureMarketer should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/FutureMarketer.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Celestinesucess (talk) 04:30, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Explanation on why your article was deleted
Hi. For an explanation on why your article was deleted, you can have a look at Articles for deletion/FutureMarketer. I have also asked you to clarify your relationship with "FutureMarketer" but you have not yet responded. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 06:00, 28 June 2016 (UTC)