User talk:Kokayi

Three revert rule
Kokayi you are violating the three revert rule on the Marta article. Please do not revert more than three times in 24 hours. Biomedeng 01:18, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

You don't know what you're talking about. This is nothing but your stilly attempt at editorial intimidation it will not work. AmazingRacer is the one guilty of this infraction.


 * It is not meant to be editorial intimidation. It is meant to serve as a warning that you cannot revert the article more than three times in 24 hours.  I assumed that because you are a new user you might be unaware of the revert policy.  Amazingracer only did three reverts which is permissible.  Please check the edit history yourself.  Biomedeng 02:18, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

I use WP daily. I'm aware of the rule. I think you need to reread it. It clearly states "This does not imply that reverting three times or fewer is acceptable. Users may be blocked for edit warring or disruption even if they do not revert more than three times per day." Yet another example of how petty and obtusely you think. AmazingRacer and you started an edit war which is the rule's focus.

What I wanted to happen happened. I stated such on the Talk Page. To draw outside attention to the page. I want to get these matters mediatated ASAP. You and AmazingRacer are nincompoops and bigots. This experience is an exploration of the open editing style of wiki. I've developed, authored, built and administrated web-based content management systems since 1996. I've have built and installed wiki software numerous times for internal corporate sites. What you two have confirmed is you're not interested in helping Atlanta transit users understand and use transit wisely. You're more interested in engrandizing yourselves as Wiki authors and will go to extraordinary lengths to protect your specious cruff laden lowest common denominator content.

It's for this reason I've determined that my site TransitWiki.org will not be an open wiki. WP MARTA entry is not something I could ever use for TransitWiki. I thought I could open the site to other editors via open editing but two have proven otherwise. I thought with more editors I could generate more content. Looks like it's better if I edit it myself for the moment. I only made contributions here while I'm taking breaks from TransitWiki. I will continue to make revision as I see fit.

Look at the German and Japanese version of MARTA. You don't see the stupid BS you've authored. Everything you've done regarding MARTA has been poorly copied from MARTA's site or Coxopoly AJC MARTA gossip. There no such thing as a NORTH-SOUTH or ORANGE LINE. The lines are titled North, Northeast, West, East, South, and Proctor Creek. When racer copied his "ridestore located..." it was a direct copy from MARTA's site but did you call him on his copyright violation as you did me. NO! Because you're a bigoted hack. You dullards have shown me exactly the type of contributer I do not want for TransitWiki.org. Thank God, I haven't opened TransitWiki to the likes of you two and chose prototyping on a secure mirror site. What you've done here has shown me what NOT to do. I will not have to worry about WP low quality MARTA content ever being any competition with a cockblocker hack like you at the helm. Thanks for posting your speel on my talk page. Because it allows me to directly address your stupidity without censor.

If there are other pro-transit or smart growth oriented authors interested developing WOW quality, GPS/GIS enhanced transit oriented wiki contact me at transitwiki@gmail.com.

--Kokayi 16:18, 1 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.
 * I also would appreciate mediation on this issue. The personal attacks are not necessary to make your point. Biomedeng 17:12, November 2006 (UTC)

Get a grip BioMedEng. This is MY TALKPAGE! Stop WikiLawyering --Kokayi 19:18, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * This may be your talk page, but I don't apprecate you calling me a bigoted hack and a cockblocker. I would be fine if you deleted all of your and my contents in this section.  But if you are going to call me all sorts of hateful things then I feel compelled to come here and defend myself.  Biomedeng 20:59, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

I've been nothing but civil to you in the past and look how you've responded. Everything you've said or done towards me has been spiteful and I've never liked it. I've had enough, It's BOLEKAJA time! I could see your gripe if this was on someother page. But this is MY TALK PAGE! You initiated a direct conversation with ME with your pettyness. Yeah I notice how you reported revisions but didn't report AmazingRacer's. When AmazingRacer called me crazy on the the talkpage why did you mention personal attacks to him? So everything I've said previously accurately describes your behavior. If you don't like it then stop watching this page and STOP HARASSING ME --Kokayi 02:27, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

My Name
While I want no part of thw above arguement, I have noticed that you always bring my name up when trying to argue or defend and I would ask that you stop. While you are not violating any Wikipedia rules for doing so, I ask that you stop because you are using my name in a slanderous way (might be against Wikipedia Rules). You keep recommending me for violation of rule I did not break. The rule is that you are allowed to revert the page three times in 24 hours, but no more. I did just that, I reverted only 3 times. So I can not be reported. Also you keep stating that I have made personal attacks against you and have called you crazy. Neither of which I have done. Heck even search the talk page for crazy, its only on there twice. Me stating that what you are doing is crazy (credit card section) and Biomedeng used it again in refernece to a comment I made about the Breeze gates. While I have no bone to pick with you or anything like that it is fairly obvious you ahve something against me. What that is, is beyond me. Amazingracer 21:58, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

User notice: temporary 3RR block
==Regarding reversions made on October 31 2006 to Metropolitan_Atlanta_Rapid_Transit_Authority== You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. The duration of the block is 24 hours. William M. Connolley 21:08, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Someone has sent for the Cabal!
A Mediation Cabal case in which you were listed as a participant has now been opened. I will be your mediator in this matter. Please contribute at Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-10-27 Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority. Thanks! Stifle (talk) 13:56, 4 November 2006 (UTC)